Jump to content

The Administration Thread


Boycie

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said:

I don't want to open a closed wound if it's closed...is it over and if it is...where has this been reported or is it that as we're now under new ownership WW can not pursue a case in court ?‍♀️ 

When we were administration they were not allowed to lodge a claim. Now we're out, their chancer of a chairman will probably try. But, it is such a weak claim nothing will come of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheresOnlyWanChope said:

Agreed, doubt Wycombe can launch a successful claim. Derby have ownership now and any decent lawyer will bat it off. They are dreaming of extorting money- times gone now. 

Now we are out of administration Wycombe win’t be able to use the EFL kangaroo court against us, so will have to take it to a real court. And all that will do us give the judiciary their biggest laugh in ages.  Bring it on, Wycombe man. 

Edited by DavesaRam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DavesaRam said:

Now we are out of administration Wycombe win’t be able to use the EFL kangaroo court against us, so will have to take it to a real court. And all that will do us give the judiciary their biggest laugh in ages.  Ring it on, Wycombe man. 

I thought the rule was "No taking fellow members to courts of law.  Call the EFL, and we'll set aside a private and neutral room in Preston to sort it out between ourselves"!  ?‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Unlucky Alf said:

I don't want to open a closed wound if it's closed...is it over and if it is...where has this been reported or is it that as we're now under new ownership WW can not pursue a case in court ?‍♀️ 

Yeah that seems likely. The ambulance chaser’s ‘claim’ was against old DCFC and quite possible that liability was NoT transferred to DC’s company under the asset transfer agreement.  Q suggested months ago the whole thing was manageable so maybe they agreed with Couhpig months ago to pay WW’s legal fees on the club leaving administration - in which case Couhpig’s  law firm will doubtless have been billing WW weekly at top whack rates 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Yeah that seems likely. The ambulance chaser’s ‘claim’ was against old DCFC and quite possible that liability was NoT transferred to DC’s company under the asset transfer agreement.  Q suggested months ago the whole thing was manageable so maybe they agreed with Couhpig months ago to pay WW’s legal fees on the club leaving administration - in which case Couhpig’s  law firm will doubtless have been billing WW weekly at top whack rates 

I bloody hope not ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Elwood P Dowd said:

It is my understanding that with a take over all the debts and liabilities, whether they are known at the time of the sale or not, are assumed by the new owner. 
 

Sorry Alf

Well except that the unsecured creditor claims will presumably be paid by q/old DCFC, as will MsD and hmrc. So in this case you’d think the liabilities transferred will exclude various things. I doubt DC has assumed any liability to WW 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

Well except that the unsecured creditor claims will presumably be paid by q/old DCFC, as will MsD and hmrc. So in this case you’d think the liabilities transferred will exclude various things. I doubt DC has assumed any liability to WW 

The purchaser assumes all liabilities known or unknown, the only way to avoid any issues to settle any known litigation before the takeover.

The other method is reduce the purchase price to reflect risk of any, unsettled, outstanding litigation which should take place after the takeover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Elwood P Dowd said:

The purchaser assumes all liabilities known or unknown, the only way to avoid any issues to settle any known litigation before the takeover.

The other method is reduce the purchase price to reflect risk of any, unsettled, outstanding litigation which should take place after the takeover.

I think it depends whether you acquire shares, or assets and liabilities 

Buy shares and you get the business warts and all 

Buy the business and you assume whatever liabilities you agree to assume under the business transfer agreement 

DC bought the business apparently and if q did their own deal with Couhpig (they indicated they did) then the Couhpig liabilities would have been excluded in the BTA  Id think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kevinhectoring said:

I think it depends whether you acquire shares, or assets and liabilities 

Buy shares and you get the business warts and all 

Buy the business and you assume whatever liabilities you agree to assume under the business transfer agreement 

DC bought the business apparently and if q did their own deal with Couhpig (they indicated they did) then the Couhpig liabilities would have been excluded in the BTA  Id think 

Unfortunately not, a takeover of a company is of all its Assets and its liabilities known or unknown. Remember the purchaser is taking over an existing legal entity.

I don’t consider WW claim to have any legal merit  at all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Elwood P Dowd said:

It is my understanding that with a take over all the debts and liabilities, whether they are known at the time of the sale or not, are assumed by the new owner. 
 

Sorry Alf

However, this isn’t a “takeover” the club is being taken out of administration from administrators , with an agreed and approved plan with the current creditors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, WystonRam said:

However, this isn’t a “takeover” the club is being taken out of administration from administrators , with an agreed and approved plan with the current creditors.

It is a takeover, by the purchaser, however it achieved, straight purchase or via administration, of the legal entity that is Derby County.
 

There is no other way for a new buyer to obtain ownership of the club but to Takeover, assume responsibility for, its assets and liabilities.

The Administrators simply administrate the company until a new buyer is found and takes over the legal responsibility for the entity of the company. If the club had gone into liquidation then things would have been very different.

 

Edited by Elwood P Dowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DavesaRam said:

Now we are out of administration Wycombe win’t be able to use the EFL kangaroo court against us, so will have to take it to a real court. And all that will do us give the judiciary their biggest laugh in ages.  Bring it on, Wycombe man. 

Looking at the BBC sports website Wycombe are currently bottom of league 1 (on alphabetical order ?). Let's hope, just for their owner (nothing against the club or it's fans) they still are at the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tamworthram said:

Looking at the BBC sports website Wycombe are currently bottom of league 1 (on alphabetical order ?). Let's hope, just for their owner (nothing against the club or it's fans) they still are at the end of the season.

Yes but conversely Derby are ninth, would you be happy with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...