StaffsRam Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 13 minutes ago, Rab a dab doo said: Going to arbitration they must believe they have more than a fair chance of winning their argument. It also gets us out of this potential stalemate situation where nothing is being resolved. If it’s courts route then the MFC/WW claims get laughed out of the building in 5 minutes. If it’s arbitration then we raise a similar complaint against QPR in case we lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Just now, StaffsRam said: If it’s courts route then the MFC/WW claims get laughed out of the building in 5 minutes. If it’s arbitration then we raise a similar complaint against QPR in case we lose. Except our projected loss would be for the full amount of promotion income presumably (based on Boro’s logic) seeing as we missed out on promotion but they just missed out on playoffs. StaffsRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 4 minutes ago, StaffsRam said: My understanding is that the EFL can withdraw our golden share for taking the matter outside the EFL procedures if we do that. Could be wrong though. Hope I’m wrong…. ? Staffs, I'm 65 and life gets confusing at times, Lets not make me any more confusing as I am ? StaffsRam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Just now, Indy said: Except our projected loss would be for the full amount of promotion income presumably (based on Boro’s logic) seeing as we missed out on promotion but they just missed out on playoffs. It sounds as if the Gibbon has reduced his pluck any figure out of the air fictitious claim ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram a lamb a ding dong Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Am I missing something here? Now we have a bid made and if Admin accept then we can crack on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Just now, Ram a lamb a ding dong said: Am I missing something here? Now we have a bid made and if Admin accept then we can crack on. Yes, but we might get a better bid… Indy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 NEWSFLASH Wycombe increase claim on Derby County from 7m to 14m. Blaming today's defeat taking them from 1st to 4th on having to watch the Notts Forest v Derby game right to the end thus making them ill prepared for their own match. A visibly shaking Rob Couhig said after the game..'its always Derby..they will cost us the 7m quid we would get for winning the league, today was all down to them..we were ill prepared..if they hadn't played early we would have won this game 5-0 and every other game we have left - Derby have ruined another Wycombe season we demand compensation.' Ram-Alf, Ramarena, Ram@Lincoln and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rab a dab doo Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 'Might' here's hoping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 If the Binnie family are willing to take on the claims, you’d say they have very good lawyers who they’ve turned to and said hahahahaha, they’ve got no chance, I’ll beat them easy. Rammy03 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 1 minute ago, Bald Eagle's Barmy Army said: If the Binnie family are willing to take on the claims, you’d say they have very good lawyers who they’ve turned to and said hahahahaha, they’ve got no chance, I’ll beat them easy. They are Yanks..they may have seen Couhig in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 56 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: I'm not sure, so could you define pedantry for me? Not really pedantry. If we've not named a preferred bidder its because the administrators have yet to find anyone to take on the club in its current state. Its disingenuous to say they have got a preferred bidder but cant name them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 44 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: But but but, Weren't we about to announce a PB, Only for the EFL to say the PB must accept that M/WW are creditors, With that they get a payout, So how can Q announce a PB, If the PB is not willing to support the EFLs credit status of the Parrasites then what is the point of announcing a PB? Announce the pb as a way of proving funding until the end of the season and then tell the EFL we will defend ourselves against Boro and Wycombe but if they are successful we will be liquidated. It will then put the ball firmly in the EFLs court as they will be forced to say they dont think we can make it to the end of the season based on the fictitious claims. Rev and Ram-Alf 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IslandExile Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 8 minutes ago, Ram a lamb a ding dong said: Am I missing something here? Now we have a bid made and if Admin accept then we can crack on. You're missing that it's a big IF and that the Administrators/creditors and the EFL have to accept it. So....a very big IF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Just now, G STAR RAM said: Announce the pb as a way of proving funding until the end of the season and then tell the EFL we will defend ourselves against Boro and Wycombe but if they are successful we will be liquidated. It will then put the ball firmly in the EFLs court as they will be forced to say they dont think we can make it to the end of the season based on the fictitious claims. Brinkmanship is a dangerous game but I think this might be the best way. Or the only way. Ram-Alf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 11 minutes ago, Ram a lamb a ding dong said: Am I missing something here? Now we have a bid made and if Admin accept then we can crack on. Agree, ? Rammy03 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 14 minutes ago, G STAR RAM said: Not really pedantry. If we've not named a preferred bidder its because the administrators have yet to find anyone to take on the club in its current state. Its disingenuous to say they have got a preferred bidder but cant name them. That does not necessarily follow. They could have a PB and have not yet named them. Indeed that is what happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 6 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: That does not necessarily follow. They could have a PB and have not yet named them. Indeed that is what happened. So have they named the PB ? Missed that. Great news Macca #COYR ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 9 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: That does not necessarily follow. They could have a PB and have not yet named them. Indeed that is what happened. Hence why I said the EFL are not stopping them from naming a preferred bidder? RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaRam Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 I thought they haven’t been able to name a PB because the bidders weren’t happy with taking on the claims from Boro and WW. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We'll be back in 81 Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 The way I see it is a preferred bidder who is willing to take on the claim would mean we can come out of administration and be able to bring players in. Then after the administration is lifted the new owners go to arbitration and if they lost the claim we could claim against QPR for a bigger amount. That would open up the floodgates for many claims from many clubs going back many years. If we win the claim those two clubs can go back down their holes where they came from. Is this correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now