OoooMarkWright Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 Can someone explain to me the rationale behind the split midfielder tactic? I’ve never seen anything so ridiculous. We push both full backs high, and replace the full backs with our central midfielders Meaning our attackers drop deep into midfield to receive the ball, leaving the centre of the pitch exposed. Very bizarre. Early days, but so far I see very little benefit. The midfielders are 60 yards apart. We can’t build up play, can’t create angles and everyone, bar the full backs, drops deeper. I’m guessing the idea is to create overloads on either side, but we barely get the ball higher up the pitch to make this effective. Weird tactic. Fla Ram, Rammy03, Deej and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 Phew. What a relief! Read the title, and thought "Bloody hell. That's all we need!" ? Jram, OoooMarkWright, LeedsCityRam and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cool As Custard Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 Because our esteemed glorious leader El Wazzo thinks he is the next Pep Guardiola Because he has seen Man City employ it tactically at times last season he thinks it will make him look like a genius if he is doing it The problem is he doesn't have a team capable of playing with the sophistication required to make the tactic work or experienced assistants to tell him what a fool he is being. No experienced manager would dream of doing what he is doing right now. Just shows how clueless he really is - the sooner he decides he's had enough using our club as his own personal plaything & disappears back home to Coleen the better Deej, GenBr, Jimbo Ram and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 (edited) 21 minutes ago, enachops said: Can someone explain to me the rationale behind the split midfielder tactic? I’ve never seen anything so ridiculous. We push both full backs high, and replace the full backs with our central midfielders Meaning our attackers drop deep into midfield to receive the ball, leaving the centre of the pitch exposed. Very bizarre. Early days, but so far I see very little benefit. The midfielders are 60 yards apart. We can’t build up play, can’t create angles and everyone, bar the full backs, drops deeper. I’m guessing the idea is to create overloads on either side, but we barely get the ball higher up the pitch to make this effective. Weird tactic. Rooney and the split midfielders tactic in real time Edited August 14, 2021 by Ramarena Premier ram, Fla Ram, Jimbo Ram and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 The idea is for players to move into positions making it harder for the opposition to mark them and dragging them out of position to open up space for us to exploit. CM to FB, FB to W, W to AM, AM to CM I think I remember one of the players describing Clement trying to use the same tactics. I think the main problem is we need CBs capable of being playmaker, and Forsyth hasn't got it in him to play the LB role - it needs to be Buchanan or Williams who have the energy to bomb up and down the wing all day. Having Bielik/Knightb in at CM instead of Shinnie would make a big difference. Carnero, 48 hours, RoyMac5 and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OoooMarkWright Posted August 14, 2021 Author Share Posted August 14, 2021 4 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: The idea is for players to move into positions making it harder for the opposition to mark them and dragging them out of position to open up space for us to exploit. CM to FB, FB to W, W to AM, AM to CM I think I remember one of the players describing Clement trying to use the same tactics. I think the main problem is we need CBs capable of being playmaker, and Forsyth hasn't got it in him to play the LB role - it needs to be Buchanan or Williams who have the energy to bomb up and down the wing all day. Having Bielik/Knightb in at CM instead of Shinnie would make a big difference. It’s not going to drag anyone out of position when it’s played at snails pace. Mind you, given the age of our back line walking football won’t be far off! GenBr, Rammy03 and jimtastic56 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravabeerbelly Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 I posted on this in an earlier thread. I agree with GoC above and it also relies on the wide att midfielders being able to come inside to play in what they call the half spaces and to know when to run off and beyond the striker. Sibley can do it and to a degree Joz can do it. It was perfectly highlighted in our first goal v Salford where I read a super tweet on it :- It’s why I was never sold on Festy playing that role today who likes to hug the line while both Lawrence and Morrison like to come towards the ball and receive it to their feet. It offered no threat beyond the forward and it’s why we looked instantly more threatening when Sibley came on. LeedsCityRam, angieram, 48 hours and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OoooMarkWright Posted August 14, 2021 Author Share Posted August 14, 2021 36 minutes ago, Ravabeerbelly said: I posted on this in an earlier thread. I agree with GoC above and it also relies on the wide att midfielders being able to come inside to play in what they call the half spaces and to know when to run off and beyond the striker. Sibley can do it and to a degree Joz can do it. It was perfectly highlighted in our first goal v Salford where I read a super tweet on it :- It’s why I was never sold on Festy playing that role today who likes to hug the line while both Lawrence and Morrison like to come towards the ball and receive it to their feet. It offered no threat beyond the forward and it’s why we looked instantly more threatening when Sibley came on. I agree. We looked a lot better when Sibley came on, he occupied that space further inside. First half, Ebosele and Byrne were standing on each other’s toes. Never going to work. LeedsCityRam and kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 I'm sure my old nan used to say that there was no point in crying over split mids..... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney1991 Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 Pep said he got tactics from a pack of flying geese from a drone as it looks like Rooney got his when the drone flew over 2 otters on the opposite side of each other drowning while building a damn and the others otters standing around watching jimtastic56, GenBr, Deej and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney1991 Posted August 15, 2021 Share Posted August 15, 2021 11 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: The idea is for players to move into positions making it harder for the opposition to mark them and dragging them out of position to open up space for us to exploit. CM to FB, FB to W, W to AM, AM to CM I think I remember one of the players describing Clement trying to use the same tactics. I think the main problem is we need CBs capable of being playmaker, and Forsyth hasn't got it in him to play the LB role - it needs to be Buchanan or Williams who have the energy to bomb up and down the wing all day. Having Bielik/Knightb in at CM instead of Shinnie would make a big difference. Can’t play this game plan with shinnie he’s not cleverer enough on the ball and can’t play it and also bird to an extent it would be far better with a bielik and Watson combination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted August 15, 2021 Share Posted August 15, 2021 It wouldn't be a bad tactic if it would suit to our strengths. Now it's just a schoolboy stuff... I'm a firm believer that tactics should be created to, first and foremost, suit the attackers available. In some first games to my surprise Rooney even managed to do this. Directly to CKR and let him do what he thinks is the best option. Now without CKR, it's up to Rooney and his team to earn his money. Blackburn with Armstrong and Norwich with Pukki have shown that those kind of players can play as a lone striker in this division. Stretton is obviously not on those levels yet, but we need to start playing like we mean to score from open play some day. We have players suited to play to his strenghts in Watson and Sibley. Lot's of through balls and even more direct running and at least we can challenge most of the teams in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now