Scott_dcfc Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 1 hour ago, BuckoBeast said: Derby Telegraph article saying deal agreed with Villa, to be done when takeover complete No it doesn't. It says 'according to reports'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Ram On Toast said: No it doesn't. It says 'according to reports'. Exactly ROT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcfc10 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 13 minutes ago, Ram On Toast said: No it doesn't. It says 'according to reports'. Is that u George thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted McMinn Football Genius Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 46 minutes ago, BathRam72 said: Isn't that double standards? Naaahhh. Brads our gypo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gypsy Ram Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 11 hours ago, Ramkesian said: Connor Sammons not coming back.....................nooooooooooooo. Love your avatar but truly a disgusting beer. It's like drinking pure sugar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosythram Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 I have read the posts regarding Lansbury and Martin and whilst open to both players, when do the hierarchy within the club draw a line and persue alternatives as against losing opportunities to further strengthen in this transfer window? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Just now, Rosythram said: I have read the posts regarding Lansbury and Martin and whilst open to both players, when do the hierarchy within the club draw a line and persue alternatives as against losing opportunities to further strengthen in this transfer window? We should try to bring in someone like David Nugent in case we don't get Martin back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 I wonder if the money used to buy Nugent was the money we had offered for Lansbury..once we knew we had no chance went for Nugent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie20 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 2 hours ago, BuckoBeast said: Derby Telegraph article saying deal agreed with Villa, to be done when takeover complete All DET are doing is reporting on reports/rumours/gossip that they have found elsewhere. This isn't journalism - just lazy - further continuation of what's long-since become tedious and boring! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supermac Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 40k a week for Lansbury? No thanks, pack up and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Supermac said: 40k a week for Lansbury? No thanks, pack up and move on. you are so right smac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 If we're going for the PL is Lansbury PL quality? If he is why's he been at NFFC for 4 plus years. The same question re quality could probably be asked about Nugent although with @100 PL appearances he clearly can play at the top level although his strike rate is low. We've had some great loan players here in the last couple of years and de sart looks like being another happy to see us go down that route Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 As long as De Sart stays fit and we can push Brad up the park can't say I'm that fussed. Johnson has goals in him, if Nugent starts dropping deep and bringing CBs with him like Martin did then we are on to a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie G Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Lansbury good player but not worth 40k a week. Mac/Mel don't break the wage structure and if you do please do it by giving Will Hughes a better deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archied Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 32 minutes ago, tomsdubs said: As long as De Sart stays fit and we can push Brad up the park can't say I'm that fussed. Johnson has goals in him, if Nugent starts dropping deep and bringing CBs with him like Martin did then we are on to a winner. I'm kind of with you on that , if this de sart is a decent quarterbacking in the Thorne mould then unless Lansbury is special ( not really seen him much ) we are stocked well for midfield in terms of personnel and the variety those players bring ,, it's just a case of MAC getting the balance and chemistry right ,, though it's easy to get pulled along with the feeling of wanting to beat forest and villa over the whole Lansbury saga ,bringing him in on that wage could well do more harm than good to us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 With Villa chasing him we really should move on and look at better options, don't want to drop to Villa level in quality... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAT Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Maaaaaaan this has gone so far past stupid! The club need to officially move on and stop helping Forest make any kind of headlines. Their club is in such a poor state that this is clearly a way of trying to get some kind of positive attention from the media. Go back to the shadows Forest! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archied Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Yep ,, if we are not going to get Lansbury and have accepted that the the club should officially announce we are no longer interested in signing him ,, that way we don't bump up forest fee or Lansbury wage packet with some phoney bidding war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Maybe we have officially moved on, just the club aren't informing us peasants. I still think Lansbury could be a bluff, a bizarre bluff but a bluff none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Maybe we have officially moved on, just the club aren't informing us peasants. I still think Lansbury could be a bluff, a bizarre bluff but a bluff none the less. Wonder who leaked our bid? Prefer it to be like Nuge deal, hear little to nothing and oh yep he's signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.