PistoldPete

Government owes Derby £20 million compo for lost revenue , Derby owes Government in tax so they are quits in my book . 

It is really very silly what other fans come up with. Blaming us for Keogh leading the players on a drunken rampage in Allestree, all Derbys fault of course despite us laying on taxis for the players to get home safely. 
Blaming us for overspending.. when we spent half what Villa did on wages, and  fraction of their net transfer spend. Our net transfer spend is about £25 million under Morris.. Villa's in the same period  is about £300 million. Financial mismanagement by Derby, but not by Villa apparently.. because they got promoted and we didn't. 

The thing is with Hmrc, if they liquidate the club that means no more Paye from players wages . Which makes no sense , and I as a taxpayer leave alone a Rams fan would not be happy with such a counterproductive stance.

its called leaving no stone unturned. Retweet it and who knows Warren Buffet or Jeff Bezos might email them. Amazon Prime Park Stadium anyone? 

Sad if unexpected. Hope everyone affected gets something sorted soon.

Don't care two hoots what other clubs' fans think, all my attention, particularly now, is focussed on Derby County. 

I bet some Barnsley fans were saying the same thing at the start of last season, before they ended up with 78 points.

It is really very silly what other fans come up with. Blaming us for Keogh leading the players on a drunken rampage in Allestree, all Derbys fault of course despite us laying on taxis for the players to get home safely. 
Blaming us for overspending.. when we spent half what Villa did on wages, and  fraction of their net transfer spend. Our net transfer spend is about £25 million under Morris.. Villa's in the same period  is about £300 million. Financial mismanagement by Derby, but not by Villa apparently.. because they got promoted and we didn't. 

I think we will be over the limit more than once as we got our budgeting wrong due to our amortisation policy . The 9 points would mean we don’t keep being punished for the same thing. But really overspending was the reason we were in a precarious  position going into the pandemic and then we lost £20 million of revenue too and ended in administration and 12 point deduction.

It is really very silly what other fans come up with. Blaming us for Keogh leading the players on a drunken rampage in Allestree, all Derbys fault of course despite us laying on taxis for the players to get home safely. 
Blaming us for overspending.. when we spent half what Villa did on wages, and  fraction of their net transfer spend. Our net transfer spend is about £25 million under Morris.. Villa's in the same period  is about £300 million. Financial mismanagement by Derby, but not by Villa apparently.. because they got promoted and we didn't. 

It is really very silly what other fans come up with. Blaming us for Keogh leading the players on a drunken rampage in Allestree, all Derbys fault of course despite us laying on taxis for the players to get home safely. 
Blaming us for overspending.. when we spent half what Villa did on wages, and  fraction of their net transfer spend. Our net transfer spend is about £25 million under Morris.. Villa's in the same period  is about £300 million. Financial mismanagement by Derby, but not by Villa apparently.. because they got promoted and we didn't. 

Sad if unexpected. Hope everyone affected gets something sorted soon.

Well he is owner of the Company .. directly or otherwise a person of significant control according to Companies House. I think that’s what they mean. 

I don't know. Philip Neville was manager though of England women's team.
But I guess it's like political commentators.. plenty of Scottish ones commenting on the UK Parliament (Kuensberg for example)  ... are there any English ones commenting on the Scottish Parliament?    
 
 

its called leaving no stone unturned. Retweet it and who knows Warren Buffet or Jeff Bezos might email them. Amazon Prime Park Stadium anyone? 

its called leaving no stone unturned. Retweet it and who knows Warren Buffet or Jeff Bezos might email them. Amazon Prime Park Stadium anyone? 

Not sure that it has been on the agenda of EFL to save the club from anything so far has it? Let's hope that they can be persuaded that punishing the club any further really isn't going to help in efforts to save us, far from it.  

Not sure that it has been on the agenda of EFL to save the club from anything so far has it? Let's hope that they can be persuaded that punishing the club any further really isn't going to help in efforts to save us, far from it.  

Not sure that it has been on the agenda of EFL to save the club from anything so far has it? Let's hope that they can be persuaded that punishing the club any further really isn't going to help in efforts to save us, far from it.  

The method was found to be systematic by the IDC. That point was not overturned by the LAP. 
The requirement of the accounting standard was for the depreciation method to reflect the expected use of the economic benefits of the intangible assets, and the LAP found that "use of economic benefits  " did not include selling the assets even though "economic benefits" is expressly defined in the FRS accounting standard  to include the benefit of disposal. 
Derby's analysis of transfer valuations  was irrelevant as they were not allowed , according to LAP's take on FRS standard,  to take any account of the benefit of disposing of a player during the contract. 
I think the LAP's findings are arguable at best, but I agree that it is likely that Derby's choice of this method was probably influenced by a desire to kick costs down the road.
 

The method was found to be systematic by the IDC. That point was not overturned by the LAP. 
The requirement of the accounting standard was for the depreciation method to reflect the expected use of the economic benefits of the intangible assets, and the LAP found that "use of economic benefits  " did not include selling the assets even though "economic benefits" is expressly defined in the FRS accounting standard  to include the benefit of disposal. 
Derby's analysis of transfer valuations  was irrelevant as they were not allowed , according to LAP's take on FRS standard,  to take any account of the benefit of disposing of a player during the contract. 
I think the LAP's findings are arguable at best, but I agree that it is likely that Derby's choice of this method was probably influenced by a desire to kick costs down the road.
 

The method was found to be systematic by the IDC. That point was not overturned by the LAP. 
The requirement of the accounting standard was for the depreciation method to reflect the expected use of the economic benefits of the intangible assets, and the LAP found that "use of economic benefits  " did not include selling the assets even though "economic benefits" is expressly defined in the FRS accounting standard  to include the benefit of disposal. 
Derby's analysis of transfer valuations  was irrelevant as they were not allowed , according to LAP's take on FRS standard,  to take any account of the benefit of disposing of a player during the contract. 
I think the LAP's findings are arguable at best, but I agree that it is likely that Derby's choice of this method was probably influenced by a desire to kick costs down the road.
 

The method was found to be systematic by the IDC. That point was not overturned by the LAP. 
The requirement of the accounting standard was for the depreciation method to reflect the expected use of the economic benefits of the intangible assets, and the LAP found that "use of economic benefits  " did not include selling the assets even though "economic benefits" is expressly defined in the FRS accounting standard  to include the benefit of disposal. 
Derby's analysis of transfer valuations  was irrelevant as they were not allowed , according to LAP's take on FRS standard,  to take any account of the benefit of disposing of a player during the contract. 
I think the LAP's findings are arguable at best, but I agree that it is likely that Derby's choice of this method was probably influenced by a desire to kick costs down the road.
 

No surprise. I don't think him and Wayne really worked together. 

Trigger for admin was the collapse of the latest takeover talks with Horton and co, and MSd wanting their money.