whiteroseram Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Which will start with Roos suspended? We know WR wants RA as his 2nd choice, but if our asumptions are righ that it's about cost and prefering DM's wages to be off the bill and having seen RA be appaling every game for us, would he be tempted to drop DM in? Personally I think he'll stick with RA because he's played a few games (inc an U23 match) in recent weeks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cook1988 Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Hopefully Marsh but can't see it, something is wrong so can see us having no keeper on bench next game, have we registered a 4th ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuffolkRam Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Now we cannot force him out before January surely we will start Marshall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Cook1988 said: Hopefully Marsh but can't see it, something is wrong so can see us having no keeper on bench next game, have we registered a 4th ? Harrison Foulkes will be on bench. Ram-Alf, r_wilcockson and RoyMac5 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 46 minutes ago, whiteroseram said: Which will start with Roos suspended? We know WR wants RA as his 2nd choice, but if our asumptions are righ that it's about cost and prefering DM's wages to be off the bill and having seen RA be appaling every game for us, would he be tempted to drop DM in? Personally I think he'll stick with RA because he's played a few games (inc an U23 match) in recent weeks Curtis Davies in goal. His handling is very good. Chris_Martin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 If there is a clause in Marshall’s contract that triggers a payment if he plays again, how does that stand now we are in administration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 13 minutes ago, Boycie said: If there is a clause in Marshall’s contract that triggers a payment if he plays again, how does that stand now we are in administration? Not that old chestnut again ? 33 appearances - he only has to complete another 30 minutes and we have to buy him an LP. GB SPORTS, Rammeister and Rev 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Just now, Crewton said: Not that old chestnut again ? 33 appearances - he only has to complete another 30 minutes and we have to buy him an LP. Well, it could also be a auto contract extension, due to his age on signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 21 minutes ago, Boycie said: If there is a clause in Marshall’s contract that triggers a payment if he plays again, how does that stand now we are in administration? Yes, It says that if Marshall plays 34 games Rooney owes him a fiver. Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: Yes, It says that if Marshall plays 34 games Rooney owes him a fiver. He spent the fiver on a drone for videoing training sessions though, and Rooneys like the queen, he don’t carry cash. especially fivers, they’re mostly all fake anyway. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Just now, Boycie said: He spent the fiver on a drone for videoing training sessions though, and Rooneys like the queen, he don’t carry cash. especially fivers, they’re mostly all fake anyway. I tried to spend this at my local shop, Bloke said it was fake, Still can't see why ? Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Rooney just said allsopp is playing Wednesday. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Unlucky Alf said: I tried to spend this at my local shop, Bloke said it was fake, Still can't see why ? Edited September 25, 2021 by Boycie Supweit? Ram-Alf and Kinder 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarterForTen Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Unlucky Alf said: I tried to spend this at my local shop, Bloke said it was fake, Still can't see why ? Best she’s looked for years Ram-Alf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 (edited) Maybe the gossip about Marshall not playing when the wages weren't paid are true? Edited September 25, 2021 by RoyMac5 Coneheadjohn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Sagan Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Seems pretty clear there's the contractual clause preventing Marshall playing. People have queried the strange number of actual appearances, but sometimes these clauses also apply to unused substitute appearances. It will either be Harrison-Foulkes or no sub on the bench. As a club we cannot afford additional payments to Wigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 18 minutes ago, Carl Sagan said: Seems pretty clear there's the contractual clause preventing Marshall playing. People have queried the strange number of actual appearances, but sometimes these clauses also apply to unused substitute appearances. It will either be Harrison-Foulkes or no sub on the bench. As a club we cannot afford additional payments to Wigan. We're not playing Harrison Ford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewquayRam Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Neil Warnock didn’t used to name a sub goalkeeper as Jagielka was supposed to be good enough to cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkleyram Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Ed Dawes said on Radio Derby that he had been told by the club that there was no contract payment due to Wigan if Marshall played or was on the bench and that it was a footballing decision by the manager. If Foulkes is picked won’t that create the same problem with the efl and squad numbers for players with no previous first team experience? Guess we might find out on Wednesday night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted September 26, 2021 Share Posted September 26, 2021 Rooney literally said on his rams tv interview that Marshall would be in the squad on Wednesday. There is no conspiracy, Marshall is just crap. MuespachRam, tinman, Zag zig and 6 others 4 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now