EnigmaRam

Well if they want to sell him they need to actually play him. So far he’s offered little and we won’t get half what we paid, or should have paid.

Festy back in the squad and a start for Stretton 

Festy back in the squad and a start for Stretton 

Festy back in the squad and a start for Stretton 

It wasn’t just the saves, it was the commanding of his box under aerial bombardment which frankly I’ve rarely seen and not for many years, and quality of corners and set pieces like I haven’t seen at this level - he stopped 3 goals direct from corners with punches. The savings were good, a couple of top draw ones especially the one at the end. 
 
Name me a keeping performance from a Derby keeper better than last night. I’m happy to be educated, I don’t think I’ve seen one since at least Poom.
But we are talking about one game - this does not change my opinion on Roos, I’d prefer to see Marshall in goal. He has to use this to be more consistent and win me over.

Seriously think this commentator has a man crush on Bowyer

I don’t buy this not gaining an advantage by what we did guff. There has to be a reason why 71 clubs do it one way and we did it another. 
 
Obviously that’s what the club would claim but is utter tosh. We got found out and need to agree the punishment ASAP. 

Under normal circumstances yes they would be set. However, as we’ve had to resubmit the accounts with a different amortisation method it will have thrown out the balance sheet. This in turn may have put us over the limit, in which case as they had previously been accepted there are mitigating factors that wouldn’t have been known. So not so straight forward. 
 
I also believe the latest accounts have been submitted in a covid era so that could also be a factor as to discussions rather than a defined points deduction. Factor in the wage decrease we’ve systematically enacted and there is plenty of mitigation for a reduction in whatever punishment is deemed as “fixed”

Yep, another assumption 

Under normal circumstances yes they would be set. However, as we’ve had to resubmit the accounts with a different amortisation method it will have thrown out the balance sheet. This in turn may have put us over the limit, in which case as they had previously been accepted there are mitigating factors that wouldn’t have been known. So not so straight forward. 
 
I also believe the latest accounts have been submitted in a covid era so that could also be a factor as to discussions rather than a defined points deduction. Factor in the wage decrease we’ve systematically enacted and there is plenty of mitigation for a reduction in whatever punishment is deemed as “fixed”

Yep, another assumption 

Under normal circumstances yes they would be set. However, as we’ve had to resubmit the accounts with a different amortisation method it will have thrown out the balance sheet. This in turn may have put us over the limit, in which case as they had previously been accepted there are mitigating factors that wouldn’t have been known. So not so straight forward. 
 
I also believe the latest accounts have been submitted in a covid era so that could also be a factor as to discussions rather than a defined points deduction. Factor in the wage decrease we’ve systematically enacted and there is plenty of mitigation for a reduction in whatever punishment is deemed as “fixed”

Pretty ridiculous really. We can’t loan a player out to develop. We can’t sign anyone on loan to help them develop. We can’t give some out of work a contract because we aren’t allowed to. What a farce this is 

Pretty ridiculous really. We can’t loan a player out to develop. We can’t sign anyone on loan to help them develop. We can’t give some out of work a contract because we aren’t allowed to. What a farce this is 

Pretty ridiculous really. We can’t loan a player out to develop. We can’t sign anyone on loan to help them develop. We can’t give some out of work a contract because we aren’t allowed to. What a farce this is 

Pretty ridiculous really. We can’t loan a player out to develop. We can’t sign anyone on loan to help them develop. We can’t give some out of work a contract because we aren’t allowed to. What a farce this is 

Pretty ridiculous really. We can’t loan a player out to develop. We can’t sign anyone on loan to help them develop. We can’t give some out of work a contract because we aren’t allowed to. What a farce this is 

If we’re not gonna be out of embargo to be able to sign players before the window shuts we may aswell continue talks to get the smallest deduction possible. 

Gone for this using the team selector on the DET website:

Subs: Allsopp  Forsyth  Stearman  Watson  Hutchison   Lawrence  Stretton

But that rules out any loan players we were wanting to add to the team. That’s generally where the added quality comes from. 

Yes we'll be getting new cards at some point, the chips in the old cards have expired.

If we’re not gonna be out of embargo to be able to sign players before the window shuts we may aswell continue talks to get the smallest deduction possible. 

If we’re not gonna be out of embargo to be able to sign players before the window shuts we may aswell continue talks to get the smallest deduction possible. 

If we’re not gonna be out of embargo to be able to sign players before the window shuts we may aswell continue talks to get the smallest deduction possible. 

If we’re not gonna be out of embargo to be able to sign players before the window shuts we may aswell continue talks to get the smallest deduction possible.