cheron85

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

I do find it interesting that we missed out in 2014 to a club who just blatantly ignored any attempt at FFP compliance - And then when they were brought back down to our league their fine was hugely reduced by the EFL because it could have put them out of business - We haven't flouted the rules anywhere near as blatantly and the EFL is hammering us

Mate, ya can't use terms like 'open and fair' and then in the same paragraph use terms like '********', 'want him challenged', 'bumbling', etc - that's not open and fair. To be open and fair requires both sides to be open minded and listen to what the other has to say. Would you respond well to being challenged as you suggest Mel should be? I imagine not so why should he. This needs to be a sensible discussion so we understand what's gone on, what the latest is, etc. I'm not defending him, etc - just saying that you can't have it all ways.

Must be fake news because it all seems reasonable, informed and vaguely positive - We don't have that kind of news around here

That's a simple one - He's made it very clear over the years that there is a limit to the amount he can put in and even attempt to stay compliant with FFP

He has indeed - I tend to find the BBC don't report anything unless they've got 3 credible sources so I take this all as being a useful update

If anyone was wondering the TM stood for Ta-ta Mate. Also Treetard Muppet. 

I mean, there was news there on literally all of those things...
I think what you seem to be expecting is 'resolutions' not news - And oddly you don't get those from BBC Derby journalists...

I mean, there was news there on literally all of those things...
I think what you seem to be expecting is 'resolutions' not news - And oddly you don't get those from BBC Derby journalists...

Must be fake news because it all seems reasonable, informed and vaguely positive - We don't have that kind of news around here

Must be fake news because it all seems reasonable, informed and vaguely positive - We don't have that kind of news around here

Must be fake news because it all seems reasonable, informed and vaguely positive - We don't have that kind of news around here

Irony thy name is BuckoBeast...

That's a simple one - He's made it very clear over the years that there is a limit to the amount he can put in and even attempt to stay compliant with FFP

That's a simple one - He's made it very clear over the years that there is a limit to the amount he can put in and even attempt to stay compliant with FFP

Ok, first of all I want to thank those that have respected the mods wishes over the Rooney photos, they have been acting on the forum guidelines which I put in place and what they moderate to.
Now Google ads help towards the funding of this forum, they have their guidelines which I must respect to show their ads on the forum in return for money which helps cover costs to stay online. 
The forum is that large now, we cannot stay online without creating revenue through adverts. No adverts no forum it’s as simple as that.
Over the years we have had several warnings, some of which threatening over nudity and other things, warnings which have been over content which we felt was ok to leave up at the time.
For example we had to remove the photos from Conehead John’s sons operations where stitches were showing as it was classed as sensitive content, go look, you won’t see any of those images and that was particularly tough job explaining to John privately. We’ve had pictures of bikinis that have also had to be removed, nothing more than you would see in a tabloid newspaper that is also funded by Google ads.
The truth is, us “small” websites are under a different set of guidelines than the big sites that generate double figure million clicks a month. 
It’s frustrating and equally frustrating when members do not appreciate that it’s not the moderators being overly aggressive with the moderation, be it remove humour or in this case protect Rooney. 
I can tell you now for a fact as I have just read the discussion in the moderation room before posting this, they have removed the photos due to Google and they acted correctly and have just thanked them.
I have not been in contact with them all day and have only signed into the admin panel to verify new members.
This was a scheduled day off for myself and had no intention of coming online, but here we are in another daily episode of being a Derby County fan.
Now this might sound harsh, but if any member cannot respect that we are under strict Google guidelines and the photos cannot be posted, please just sign out, take a few days to try and understand.
This forum is used by many fans, fans that can respect and understand our position whilst also appreciating the platform we offer, I will not and have instructed the moderators not to let anything jeopardise the future of this forum which I fully intend it to have.
Finally, I have said to the moderators just now, we can allow you to discuss the situation, that is fine, but you must not post the photos. 
Whilst this isn’t to protect Rooney, please also respect our rule regarding profanity towards ANYONE connected to the club, be it the cleaner, kit man or manager. 
?