Archie

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Always been a horrible club. WBA and Villa always had more class. Karma for singing the party song, especially with what they're going through, too. 

Birmingham fans are a vile bunch. Absolutely grim bunch of people. I actually thought it was going to be a collective “duck the efl” and the dodgy owners of both clubs but no. Should have guessed that they’d be chanting about Derby dying. They got what they deserved in the end and I couldn’t be happier about it. 
 

Are they bringing their flag, that’ll be a big plus 

I've got 8 Swiss fans coming over for the game

Hope I'm desperately wrong but still think the EFL have one or two more vindictive twists of the knife left in them before things progress. They are desperate we go down but a couple of wins in the next 3/4 games and it's game on. They know that so will  try to gain a bit more advantage before they have to cut loose. I detest them (and Morris) more than I've ever detested anything in my life. Need a holiday....

Hope I'm desperately wrong but still think the EFL have one or two more vindictive twists of the knife left in them before things progress. They are desperate we go down but a couple of wins in the next 3/4 games and it's game on. They know that so will  try to gain a bit more advantage before they have to cut loose. I detest them (and Morris) more than I've ever detested anything in my life. Need a holiday....

Hope I'm desperately wrong but still think the EFL have one or two more vindictive twists of the knife left in them before things progress. They are desperate we go down but a couple of wins in the next 3/4 games and it's game on. They know that so will  try to gain a bit more advantage before they have to cut loose. I detest them (and Morris) more than I've ever detested anything in my life. Need a holiday....

I'm with you. Still to be reliably proven how much he's lost personally by this. Just my opinion and fag packet maths but it's nowhere near 200 million. 

I'm with you. Still to be reliably proven how much he's lost personally by this. Just my opinion and fag packet maths but it's nowhere near 200 million. 

Upsetting to lose to the trees but they probably deserved it overall. Don't shoot me down but I think that was Rooney's last game. ?

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive. 

Picking this back up again after hearing Rick Parry interviewed on both Talksport2 and Radio Five Live yesterday. Incidentally I emailed the EFL and asked for the Boro and Wycombe submissions to be made public ASAP but have received no reply. 
Seems to be a massive contradiction here that I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has picked up on it. In the EFL Q and A statement last Monday they said they were reviewing submissions from the two clubs regarding their claims. However on two radio interviews, Parry says the arbitration panel review had started with Boro and Derby (from last January) but had been held up. He went on to say no legal case had been filed and it's currently an 'in-house matter'. The presenter never asked why arbitration had been held up. 
So my question is - are they reviewing submissions from Boro for their claim as stated in their statement last Monday or has arbitration started (from last January)? This seems a massive contradiction to me. It's hard to believe anything listening to Rick Parry. Individual who sounds manipulative and permanently on the defensive.