Jump to content

Lampard “shifted the planning” for January transfer window


Day

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 hours ago, David said:

Sounds like we will be in the market for a defender next month, no great surprise although probably not what Alex Pearce wanted to hear. 

Frank can always nip into Stamford Bridge and ask Gary Cahill if he fancies a few games with us as he's not getting any game time with Chelsea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

We have lost 2 highly experienced and very good defenders for the season so no surprises that we would be looking at fit for purpose defenders 

....plus the ones in possession at present have as much chance of keeping a clean sheet as a teenage boy with porn and lube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, QuitYourJibbaJivin said:

Didn’t Pearce and Keogh play together when we kept 10 clean sheets in a row? My guess would be it’s not all down to the players. 

I think there's an argument for playing Pearce now.

I have been a supporter of Keogh in the past but he knows his pace is not what it was and this makes him even more jittery than usual. Behind him Carson hardly exudes calm and alongside him he has two young players making their way in the game and a left back happier in attack than defence.

We are in a transitional phase but the fans demand success now (and they spend good money).

I wouldn't be surprised if we went for two Steady Eddie loans to bring experience in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Anag Ram said:

I think there's an argument for playing Pearce now.

I have been a supporter of Keogh in the past but he knows his pace is not what it was and this makes him even more jittery than usual. Behind him Carson hardly exudes calm and alongside him he has two young players making their way in the game and a left back happier in attack than defence.

We are in a transitional phase but the fans demand success now (and they spend good money).

I wouldn't be surprised if we went for two Steady Eddie loans to bring experience in.

You choose to criticise Keogh's 'lack of pace'... Good job we have Panther Pearce in reserve! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he brings in a defender, it needs to be one that is comfortable with it at his feet and can pass a ball. As good as Curtis is, it's evident how much worse the team attacks when he plays because we can't move the ball out from defence. Don't see any use in replacing that with a like-for-like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said:

You choose to criticise Keogh's 'lack of pace'... Good job we have Panther Pearce in reserve! ?

I don't think I criticised his lack of pace. I merely stated getting slower has affected his confidence.

I take your point about Pearce but he can at least head the ball and bringing him in would probably see us sitting deeper which isn't ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Anag Ram said:

I don't think I criticised his lack of pace. I merely stated getting slower has affected his confidence.

I take your point about Pearce but he can at least head the ball and bringing him in would probably see us sitting deeper which isn't ideal.

How do you know that Keogh's getting slower AR? Or are you presuming he is because he's getting older?

I can only think of one player that has run past him and was obviously much quicker and that was the young Swansea player last week - and that after Keogh had played two tough games in a few days of an everpresent season, including an assault which must have still hurt several days later. I can think of plenty of forwards that he has been more than a match for, pace wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Anag Ram said:

I think there's an argument for playing Pearce now.

I have been a supporter of Keogh in the past but he knows his pace is not what it was and this makes him even more jittery than usual. 

Your argument for playing Pearce is that Keogh is slower now… ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ilkleyram said:

How do you know that Keogh's getting slower AR? Or are you presuming he is because he's getting older?

I can only think of one player that has run past him and was obviously much quicker and that was the young Swansea player last week - and that after Keogh had played two tough games in a few days of an everpresent season, including an assault which must have still hurt several days later. I can think of plenty of forwards that he has been more than a match for, pace wise.

Not just Swansea. He has struggled on a number of occasions when the ball is played beyond him.

He rarely runs into the opposition half now like he used to.

My suggestion of Pearce was not linked to the need for pace but to the jittery nature of our defence.

We have pace in Bogle, Tomori and Malone and it's not working.

Nothing wrong with having Pearce and Keogh together except that naturally means sitting deeper as we do when Davies plays.

We haven't had a back four which works as a unit all season even though individuals have had good games.

We need an organiser and Keogh is not the answer.

In relation to the Swansea game one would ask why Keogh was chasing the speedy guy when his partner is one of the quickest in the league. Example of poor game management.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Anag Ram said:

Not just Swansea. He has struggled on a number of occasions when the ball is played beyond him.

He rarely runs into the opposition half now like he used to.

My suggestion of Pearce was not linked to the need for pace but to the jittery nature of our defence.

We have pace in Bogle, Tomori and Malone and it's not working.

Nothing wrong with having Pearce and Keogh together except that naturally means sitting deeper as we do when Davies plays.

We haven't had a back four which works as a unit all season even though individuals have had good games.

We need an organiser and Keogh is not the answer.

In relation to the Swansea game one would ask why Keogh was chasing the speedy guy when his partner is one of the quickest in the league. Example of poor game management.

 

Keogh still one of the first 3 or 4 names on the team sheet for me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Anag Ram said:

Not just Swansea. He has struggled on a number of occasions when the ball is played beyond him.

He rarely runs into the opposition half now like he used to.

My suggestion of Pearce was not linked to the need for pace but to the jittery nature of our defence.

We have pace in Bogle, Tomori and Malone and it's not working.

Nothing wrong with having Pearce and Keogh together except that naturally means sitting deeper as we do when Davies plays.

We haven't had a back four which works as a unit all season even though individuals have had good games.

We need an organiser and Keogh is not the answer.

In relation to the Swansea game one would ask why Keogh was chasing the speedy guy when his partner is one of the quickest in the league. Example of poor game management.

 

We are weaker defensively for fairly obvious reasons- we have lost two highly experienced and quality defenders added to the fact that our midfield is more forward thinking and actively attacking plus we no longer have players like Russell who not only attacked well but defended his full back well and for all their attacking qualities the likes of joflo and Lawrence certinatly don’t actively protect the full back positions in addition to the reality that we are not a very tall side at all so at set pieces we will struggle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sparkle said:

We are weaker defensively for fairly obvious reasons- we have lost two highly experienced and quality defenders added to the fact that our midfield is more forward thinking and actively attacking plus we no longer have players like Russell who not only attacked well but defended his full back well and for all their attacking qualities the likes of joflo and Lawrence certinatly don’t actively protect the full back positions in addition to the reality that we are not a very tall side at all so at set pieces we will struggle 

!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...