eddie Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 49 minutes ago, Curtains said: Are you necking it down today lol One drink a day only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted December 1, 2018 Author Share Posted December 1, 2018 1 minute ago, eddie said: One drink a day only. You always get the irony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 8 minutes ago, Tamworthram said: Fair enough and, as you say, everyone is entitled to their opinions. For my part, I find it very difficult to believe that, firstly Allen (although I accept there were others involved the tussle) could grip/nuzzle (by the way, I know you weren't the originator of the term) Bradley tight enough to cause him to effectively gasp for breath and then grit his teeth in pain. It just seems a very unlikely explanation/defence (hence the stabbing story - made in poor taste and should never have been made). With regard to Bradley's intent, I don't have to prove it was his intent as there is a "maybe" in there as a possible explanation. With regard to the ladies underwear, I can confirm that my wife didn't suffer any injuries as a result of your actions but, the authorities may choose to disregard her defence of you as our CCTV footage clearly shows you with her underwear in her teeth. I fully understand and appreciate your opinion and thoughts on the matter, Tammy. In all honesty I'm not even certain what my opinion is. I doubt we'll ever know the facts. Some of us are just going to have to agree to disagree, as is often the case. Your "maybe" was in reference to the bite, was it not? My comment regarding proof was to your comment regarding intent, which in fairness you did say "it APPEARED the intent was there", so I'll give you that one! I think we both know that there is only one person who knows the true answer regarding intent. With regards to your CCTV coverage... How did I look? Any good? (It's always good to get feedback, for if I get invited round again!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottingram Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 13 minutes ago, Mafiabob said: Deserved his ban, irrespective of what Allen has done or said after. But I don’t think you can completely isolate one from the other, really. If you don’t charge Allen, imo, you can’t charge Johnson. Johnson has only been harshly treated because Allen has got away with nothing, if you charge both I have absolutely no issue whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mafiabob Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, nottingram said: But I don’t think you can completely isolate one from the other, really. If you don’t charge Allen, imo, you can’t charge Johnson. Johnson has only been harshly treated because Allen has got away with nothing, if you charge both I have absolutely no issue whatsoever. What do you charge Allen with? Not denying he should get something...... but no denying BJ bites..... been dying to say that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottingram Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mafiabob said: What do you charge Allen with? Not denying he should get something...... but no denying BJ bites..... been dying to say that Violent conduct as well I guess, very best case is Allen has left a lovely finger mark on BJ’s neck, raised his hand, worst case is he was hungry as well. Just find it very strange that nothing seems to be mentioned about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 24 minutes ago, Mucker1884 said: I fully understand and appreciate your opinion and thoughts on the matter, Tammy. In all honesty I'm not even certain what my opinion is. I doubt we'll ever know the facts. Some of us are just going to have to agree to disagree, as is often the case. Your "maybe" was in reference to the bite, was it not? My comment regarding proof was to your comment regarding intent, which in fairness you did say "it APPEARED the intent was there", so I'll give you that one! I think we both know that there is only one person who knows the true answer regarding intent. With regards to your CCTV coverage... How did I look? Any good? (It's always good to get feedback, for if I get invited round again!) Not your finest look I'm afraid. I may keep a copy to frighten the trick or treaters away next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 3 hours ago, Tamworthram said: Not your finest look I'm afraid. I may keep a copy to frighten the trick or treaters away next year. That's as good a use as any... the little feckers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 It's always a surprise when a BJ turns into a bite. It's normally an involuntary action though, caused by gagging, and can be avoided by a well timed tap on the back of the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted December 1, 2018 Author Share Posted December 1, 2018 10 minutes ago, reveldevil said: It's always a surprise when a BJ turns into a bite. It's normally an involuntary action though, caused by gagging, and can be avoided by a well timed tap on the back of the head. What causes water on the brain. Tap on the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringerBell Posted December 1, 2018 Share Posted December 1, 2018 On 30/11/2018 at 12:10, Gaspode said: Only thing I want Johnson to do is issue a public appolgy to us and the club for making us the laughing stock of football - and to instruct his agent to find somewhere else for him to carry on his neanderthal activites. - and I don't actually give a monkey's what Allen did to provoke him, biting is just unacceptable in a civilised world...... Even with fava beans and a nice chianti? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestKentRam Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Hopefully the club dentist is still employed from previous seasons, and Johnson can use his extended spell on the sidelines to have his fangs filed down to stop the rough edges getting snagged on opponents' shirts again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 8 hours ago, StringerBell said: Even with fava beans and a nice chianti? Rather than a ban, perhaps the FA should have insisted he wear one of those Hannibal Lector masks for the rest of his career.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 7 minutes ago, Gaspode said: Rather than a ban, perhaps the FA should have insisted he wear one of those Hannibal Lector masks for the rest of his career.... Good player that Peter Beardsley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofmidnight Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Fascinating to read all the different opinions but I'd just like to make a couple of points. Many years ago when I was young and a bit of a hot head I was told never to lash out with words or physically attack people. So I started venting my anger on a pillow and it worked a treat. Perhaps and it is a big perhaps Johnson bit the shirt in an attempt not to bite the person. Surely it is far worse to bite a person than a shirt. My second point is where is the evidence of an actual physical injury to Allen. I've not seen any photos of physical damage and I expect if both men were to strip off there might well be more physical damage to Johnson. I know loads of you will disagree but I find it very difficult to make it into a major event when Allen has provided absolutely no physical evidence of injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 14 hours ago, Dappled Ram said: Fascinating to read all the different opinions but I'd just like to make a couple of points. Many years ago when I was young and a bit of a hot head I was told never to lash out with words or physically attack people. So I started venting my anger on a pillow and it worked a treat. Perhaps and it is a big perhaps Johnson bit the shirt in an attempt not to bite the person. Surely it is far worse to bite a person than a shirt. My second point is where is the evidence of an actual physical injury to Allen. I've not seen any photos of physical damage and I expect if both men were to strip off there might well be more physical damage to Johnson. I know loads of you will disagree but I find it very difficult to make it into a major event when Allen has provided absolutely no physical evidence of injury. As I said....Is it an offence to bite an opponents shirt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 9 minutes ago, The Scarlet Pimpernel said: As I said....Is it an offence to bite an opponents shirt? You can get sent off for intent. If a player takes a swing at someone, he doesn't have to connect to receive a red card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 Just now, Anon said: You can get sent off for intent. If a player takes a swing at someone, he doesn't have to connect to receive a red card. So the assumption is he was trying to bite Allen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, The Scarlet Pimpernel said: So the assumption is he was trying to bite Allen? I think it's a reasonably logical assumption. It's a bit odd to just randomly chew someone's shirt, which is the alternative possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 3 minutes ago, Anon said: I think it's a reasonably logical assumption. It's a bit odd to just randomly chew someone's shirt, which is the alternative possibility. Not so sure...……Its not difficult to bite someone in the clinch they were in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.