tomsdubs Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 1.25m down the drain. What are we doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Or of course, the people who were making offers for him, if they existed, were not clubs he was interested in going to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makedoh Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Surely should of got something for him. I suppose he's off the wage bill now though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posh Ram Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Weird. Should have got something for him. And if we planned to buy out a forward's contract, why Camara and not Blackman? Still, this gives us space on the wage bill and in the squad I suppose. Hopefully we sign a winger who's an improvement on Russell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuwtfly Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC1388 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Absolute pointless releasing him? A few French clubs had been linked with him on loan, even a small loan fee with a view to a permanent deal is better than just cancelling his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenniumram Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, Posh Ram said: Weird. Should have got something for him. And if we planned to buy out a forward's contract, why Camara and not Blackman? Still, this gives us space on the wage bill and in the squad I suppose. Hopefully we sign a winger who's an improvement on Russell. Think we'll do the same for Blackman as well, no one wants either of them because they're frankly *****. It's done by mutual consent though so we won't have had to pay out his whole remaining two year contract I dount, he'll have forfeited his contract to move somewhere else for free with some compensation, but no his wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PodgeyRam Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 11 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said: Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... 'Mutual consent' I think means that we've paid off the rest of his contract and he's agreed to that. If he didn't want us to pay off the rest of his contract and he wanted to stick around, I'm not sure there was anything we could do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admira Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Roll up roll up, get your DCFC bargains. Everything must go, just make us a silly offer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said: Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... 3 minutes ago, PodgeyRam said: 'Mutual consent' I think means that we've paid off the rest of his contract and he's agreed to that. If he didn't want us to pay off the rest of his contract and he wanted to stick around, I'm not sure there was anything we could do. Actually I'm pretty sure we can cancel any contract at any time but would have to pay off the whole thing Mutual consent usually means an agreed pay off which is somewhere between zero and the full value of the contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said: Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... Probably some money but obviously not his full contract. Remember if we sell him without him asking to go, we're still liable for his contract so unless you're going to get a significant sum, you end up with this scenario. This way we save on some salary, he can join whoever he likes. Shame, had high hopes for him. But then I always do, being an optimist..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade 86 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 FFS. This window is like watching a car crash in super slow-mo. Off to the pub soon as. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiddingsRam Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Christ there is some moaners on here today. Just enjoy your summers and fret about your own money instead of Mel's. Good luck Razza , thanks for the song was brilliant at West Bromwich away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 9 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said: Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... Think we've paid him off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 *** CLEARLY THERE WAS NO INTEREST IN HIM ('COS HE'S AWFUL) SO IT BENEFITS THE CLUB TO CANCEL HIS CONTRACT FOR FREE *** What is wrong with you people?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rample Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Mutual consent at least means no pay off. What are the odds on Bent, Shackell, Pearce, Weimann or Thorne going the same way? Actually I reckon Shackell will just sit on his paycheck until his deal expires, the rest might at least want to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBG83 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Strange one but I can only assume there were a lack of offers, he knows he isn't in Rowetts plans and in fairness to him, regardless of his ability on the pitch, he's been patient and little trouble so the club may have just given him the chance to find somewhere to be happy rather than potentially waste another year of his life. Still think he should have been played as a striker at some point. Wasn't clever enough for midfield but had pace to burn and a decent shot on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highgate Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said: Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me/back me up, but I believe the "mutual consent" part means that this has cost us no money* to do. It's simply wiped a wage off the bill. *Other than the fee we paid to buy him, of course... Depends on precisely what they have 'mutually consented' to. There might be a part of his remaining contracted paid to him, or there might not be. We simply don't know. Seems to me, it's more likely that a financial compromise will have been reached between the two parties, so we will probably have to pay out something to get him to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PodgeyRam Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 12 minutes ago, cheron85 said: Actually I'm pretty sure we can cancel any contract at any time but would have to pay off the whole thing Mutual consent usually means an agreed pay off which is somewhere between zero and the full value of the contract I stand corrected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperDerbySuperRams Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 To me, this looks like teams are interesting but not willing to pay a fee. He's got a few offers, so we have agreed to let him leave without paying him off, so he has time to choose his next move Paying him off this early into the window would be an odd decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.