hintonsboots Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I would presume his loan deal means he can't play against us on the 17th ? Can anyone confirm it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 minute ago, reveldevil said: Correct Any chance he can play for us then?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Sheriff Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 5 minutes ago, Steve How Hard!!! said: Any chance he can play for us then?? Don't need him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie20 Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 16 minutes ago, Steve How Hard!!! said: Any chance he can play for us then?? Nah - just in case he does a ' Bentner'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 9 minutes ago, Simsy said: Don't need him! We are coping quite admirably without him but there is no denying that he would enhance what we have going albeit if it was just as a different option from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coneheadjohn Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Will he get a Buckoesque reception?Assuming that he will be at the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 minute ago, coneheadjohn said: Will he get a Buckoesque reception?Assuming that he will be at the ground. He would from me but for some strange reason he seems to divide opinions. Don't really understand why though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Have noticed when today someone on Radio Derby asked the same question Owen Bradley said 'no' and quickly changed the subject. He's done that before when callers try to talk about Martin, makes me wonder why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 11 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Have noticed when today someone on Radio Derby asked the same question Owen Bradley said 'no' and quickly changed the subject. He's done that before when callers try to talk about Martin, makes me wonder why. Mmmm. Sounds like he knows more about the situation, so is afraid of letting something slip if he dwells on it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted December 11, 2016 Author Share Posted December 11, 2016 Are you suggesting a conspiracy theory Roy or maybe OB just gets too emotional when Chrissy is mentioned , due to him leaving and doesn't want to break down on air. Let's face it would you like to end up crying on Ramages shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmic Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 18 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Have noticed when today someone on Radio Derby asked the same question Owen Bradley said 'no' and quickly changed the subject. He's done that before when callers try to talk about Martin, makes me wonder why. He's probably just sick of people asking. Ive seen the same question being repeated on this forum, can't imagine what it's like having every lazy Derby fan tweet him for the answer every day. It's a pretty standard clause in any loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Steve How Hard!!! said: He would from me but for some strange reason he seems to divide opinions. Don't really understand why though. Because stupid people are arsey about going to ground too easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 How many more Chris Martin threads do we really need? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 13 hours ago, cannable said: Because stupid people are arsey about going to ground too easily. Not really. I didn't notice many Derby fans sticking up for Osbourne's behaviour yesterday. If it's wrong, it's wrong for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tibbs Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 7 minutes ago, Wolfie said: Not really. I didn't notice many Derby fans sticking up for Osbourne's behaviour yesterday. If it's wrong, it's wrong for everyone. I think there's a bit of a difference between going down easier under a challenge as opposed to rolling half way down the A52 when you've not been touched at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 2 minutes ago, Mr Tibbs said: I think there's a bit of a difference between going down easier under a challenge as opposed to rolling half way down the A52 when you've not been touched at all... Osbourne was a bit more theatrical but the objective was exactly the same as Martin's falling over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tibbs Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 10 minutes ago, Wolfie said: Osbourne was a bit more theatrical but the objective was exactly the same as Martin's falling over. I disagree mate. I see Martin going down to win free kicks/penalties. Osborn reacted like that to get Bradley Johnson sent off. Martin uses simulation to take advantage of situations, Osborn was purely play acting to try and get someone wrongfully sent off, holding his face despite it never being touched. Whilst I wouldn't praise it, simulation to an extent is widely used in football game by game and has been used for years. There's a way to go about it though, the reason Lansbury and Osborn have taken such stick about it is because what they did is out of the ordinary, it's so blatant it's cringeworthy hence the media coverage. But that's my take anyway. Each to their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamsPolls Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 14 hours ago, RoyMac5 said: Have noticed when today someone on Radio Derby asked the same question Owen Bradley said 'no' and quickly changed the subject. He's done that before when callers try to talk about Martin, makes me wonder why. Owen has said numerous times why this is, It's due to the fact that Martin isn't a Derby player at the moment as he is playing for another club. While he remains a Derby players ownership wise, he isn't a Derby player. So they don't want to be talking about a player that is no longer a Derby player on BBC Radio Derby. It causes divided opinion on the subject so BBC Radio Derby avoid all talk about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz_The_Ram Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 When I listen to Owen Bradley it makes me realise how much I miss the great Graham Richards. Radio Derby's coverage really is absolutely horrendous. Ramage sounds like he is on valium, tiredly churning out cliché after cliché after cliché, and Bradley, as though he is a school leaver on his first work experience in radio. Dreadful stuff. Genuinely dreadful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.