Rammy1 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Just in time for him to start against reading next Tuesday. Good and quick moving by the money men. Martin and bent to have big competition now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Fookin hell Mel. well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamLad1884 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 8 minutes ago, DCFC90 said: Pretty much confirmed in the DET now: http://m.derbytelegraph.co.uk/Derby-County-Reading-striker-Nick-Blackman-close/story-28469841-detail/story.html Fee keeps rising it seems after reading this. £1.5 quoted earlier, then 2 million, then 2.5 and now the DET seems to think it could go up to 3 mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 nice one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Just now, RamLad1884 said: Fee keeps rising it seems after reading this. £1.5 quoted earlier, then 2 million, then 2.5 and now the DET seems to think it could go up to 3 mill Promotion bonus, apperance and goal clauses, sell on fee etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 http://www.royals.org/news/493/Blackman_To_Join_Derby_In_3_Million_Deal? http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-nick-blackman-transfer-derby-10691438? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rammy1 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 4 4 2 hopefully now. Mix it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 5 minutes ago, DCFC90 said: A photo that's as blurry as that is always conspicuous, especially in this day and age with mobile phones containing ridiculously high powered cameras; so no, it doesn't convince me at all sorry I will never class myself as an overthinker again, thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollycutts1982 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I think the positions we have lacked this season is the wide areas. JR, TI and AW have all shown glimpses of what they can do without doing it consistently. Hopefully it will give them all a kick up the Arse they need. Shrewd business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 10 minutes ago, DCFC90 said: A photo that's as blurry as that is always conspicuous, especially in this day and age with mobile phones containing ridiculously high powered cameras; so no, it doesn't convince me at all sorry Think the word you were looking for is suspicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, Srg said: Think the word you were looking for is suspicious. Yeah, conspicuous is pretty much the exact opposite of what a blurry photo is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 8 minutes ago, RamLad1884 said: Fee keeps rising it seems after reading this. £1.5 quoted earlier, then 2 million, then 2.5 and now the DET seems to think it could go up to 3 mill The fee will be £1.5m if you're a Derby fan, £3m if you're a Reading fan and £10m if you're a gump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rammy1 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Mel. Shall we get you a statue @ PP next to cloughie. We are so lucky to have a derby fan as a owner. Not many around. We're coming to get u boro. And overtake u. Champions. Forget second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yani P Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 On Sky now - the scoop that Sheff Weds have had an offer accepted for Nick Blackman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC90 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Nope, conspicuous was definitely the word I wanted to use in that it looks so obviously fake. I'm sure I'm mistaken but when something looks that blurry it stands out like a sore thumb as somehow not being real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, DCFC90 said: Nope, conspicuous was definitely the word I wanted to use in that it looks so obviously fake. I'm sure I'm mistaken but when something looks that blurry it stands out like a sore thumb as somehow not being real A bit like those Loch Ness Monster photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, DCFC90 said: Nope, conspicuous was definitely the word I wanted to use in that it looks so obviously fake. I'm sure I'm mistaken but when something looks that blurry it stands out like a sore thumb as somehow not being real If someones trying to take it one handed whilst hiding the phone from everyone else in the room with severe puckering of the old 60's tea towel holder, then one should not expect HD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ram59 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 18 minutes ago, DCFC90 said: A photo that's as blurry as that is always conspicuous, especially in this day and age with mobile phones containing ridiculously high powered cameras; so no, it doesn't convince me at all sorry You haven't seen my photos on my modern mobile with its 22mega pixell camera then! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Just now, uttoxram75 said: If someones trying to take it one handed whilst hiding the phone from everyone else in the room with severe puckering of the old 60's tea towel holder, then one should not expect HD! Hee hee took me a while to work out wtf you were on about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daib0 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Hi there, a surprise to Reading fans I must sday. Could Blackman actually play AGAINST Reading next week?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.