sage Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Guidetti and Boyata on loan for the rest of the season. They can pay the wages.Buy a LB and CM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 City can easily pay the wages of loanees send elsewhere. With a couple good loanees we could still make a push for play offs. With 6 million we could make a Barker type fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I'd go with Aguero and Yaya plus £6m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Or Kompany, Yaya and Aguero plus £3m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Guedetti and Boyata in loan would be great signings even on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 don't sell Hughes simples Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It's inevitable Shab, the chance to work with quality international players, the wages, the busy agents turning his head, no matter how much he might love the club, somebody like City can sort him out for life and he's going to take the opportunity and good luck to him. I just hope he doesn't go to City....I hate them. 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezza Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Has Hughes turned there heads or is it Glick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Glick will know the clubs wage infrastructure inside out, so if this is true, so with them subsidising the wages, it wouldn't surprise me. £6 million + 1 or 2 good loan signings, a centre back and a centre mid to replace him until the end of the season would be great! With a replacement for Hughes and the return on Barker next season (hopefully), and a couple of £2 or 3 million of that 6 million to spend, i'd imagine we'd be a much better squad than now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingy Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It is inevitable the lad is going to go in the near future. I say we create a bidding war between Arsenal, Man City, Spurs and Barcelona 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /> and sell to whoever gives us the best cash/player combo. Even though it pains me to say I would do it this transfer window as you can drive a higher price (panic buying), its no use saying he would be more value in the summer as he could easily pick up an injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It is inevitable the lad is going to go in the near future. I say we create a bidding war between Arsenal, Man City, Spurs and Barcelona 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /> and sell to whoever gives us the best cash/player combo. Even though it pains me to say I would do it this transfer window as you can drive a higher price (panic buying), its no use saying he would be more value in the summer as he could easily pick up an injury. He's already got an injury! I'd keep him for as long as possible, he'll keep developing and getting better, he's still under contract for another 2 and half years so we should be alright for another 18 months before we start trying to flog him! Palace keeping hold of Zaha for an extra year or so increased his value massively, a couple of years ago there were figures of 3 or 4 million, and now theres figures of 12-15 million. You never know, give it another year and Will's value could be closer to £10 million than £ 6 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jourdan Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I'd like to keep Hughes but I have to say if the speculation in the papers today about us demanding £10m and Manchester City willing to spend £6-7m is correct, I struggle to see how can we resist. Although it seems clear that Hughes is content and would like to continue his development here, I'm really not sure how stable we are financially to allow Clough the opportunity to nurture the player for another year or two. In an ideal world, Hughes' future would be here. How we would love for him to realise his ambitions of playing for England and playing in the Premier League with us. Then, sure we'd be talking £15 million and beyond. But realistically that could be two, three, four maybe even five years away. When developing such a precocious talent, having that time to nurture the player during their formative years is a real luxury. A luxury our financial position may not be able to afford us. I think it could well be a case of striking while the iron is hot. £7 million is not be sniffed at. But time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Ram Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Interesting one. I know it's all hypothetical but:- £10 million (supposedly) we want. Potentially being £6 million and 1-2 players 'loaned'. Which would I choose if we had to sell? I'd hold out for the £10 million. 1-2 loaners for the season gives us no long term solution. That extra £4 mill could find us some significant players that would be ours for a long time after the year of loans is over. Replace hughes add depth etc. Then the £6 mill you have you pay off some of the right debt, probably at least £3 million. Use the other £3 mill to supplement your £4 million. If not, you've only realistically got a £3 million kitty to buy a replacement for Huges and strengthen. Don't you just love playing at being a football manager or chairman:-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 problem is the two loans would have no wages for a whole season. however if we had that extra 4 million that would need to cover the wages of the bought players as well as the transfer fee. so at derby a big signing would have 10k plus a week that's 500,000 a year x2 players that's 1 million if they are both on contracts longer than one year (obviously) then we would have to consider the perms and combs. it's really a gamble as to wether the two loan players we would get would get us promoted?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDCAR Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Swaps?? OK... Swap ya Fielding for Harte Swap ya Kompany for Barker Swap ya £6million for Hughes Deal or No Deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
you-rams Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Wills not going anywhere! He wants to stay until the end of the season at least. So the worst that happens is that he'll come back on loan to us. Plus he wants to move to Liverpool because thats who he supports.. If an offer comes in, Derby can accept it but its up to Will if he wants to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robglosta Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Never mind 6m plus players, snap their hands off for 6m. Gone are the days when we can afford to resist that sort of money, we could sort out the whole team with it and push on. Hulse, cough, 4m, cough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariotofmyown Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Glick will know the clubs wage infrastructure inside out, so if this is true, so with them subsidising the wages, it wouldn't surprise me. £6 million + 1 or 2 good loan signings, a centre back and a centre mid to replace him until the end of the season would be great! With a replacement for Hughes and the return on Barker next season (hopefully), and a couple of £2 or 3 million of that 6 million to spend, i'd imagine we'd be a much better squad than now. Good theories on Glick. Regardless of any potential Hughes deal, City are a perfect club to get involved with in the shady loan market. Loads of decent players hardly getting any first team football. Send them our way, pay their wages and everyone's a winner. Come on Glick, come up with the goods! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingy Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Maybe we have to do it the Southampton way - they sold Walcott, Bale and the Ox over the years, used the cash to stabalise then build, now they can resist bids for their youngsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardifframs Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Just seen Balotelli on SSN,and said he would love to come here. I think the proof was, SSN reporter. "Mario,how are you?" Balotelli. "Aye up me duck" Done deal if you ask me ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.