ramblur Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 You do know that 50p head.... So that's why he was crap in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrysonsBoys Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 personally i'd accept any sort of offer around the £6-8m mark, rising to £10m+ based on appearances etc etc, get him loaned back to us for a season or two to help him develop some more, use the money on a more experienced/creative CM aka 'a general', 20+ goal a season striker, replacement LB who is young(ish) with plenty of potential. just my opinion but everyone's a winner in this instance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Overpaid for barker? Not sure on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rammieib Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Wouldn't want him back on loan. What advantage does it give us? We are not going to get promoted this season, so sooner let the current players or someone come in new. Why bring him back to develop more - it doesn't help us unless we believe as a player he could help mus achieve top 6, but to do that we need investment elsewhere in the playing staff which I don't believe would happen in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Tito Villa didn't come from South America and who ever scouted him (I doubt anyone) made an error.. I reckon he was signed purely because he was the top goalscorer of Tecos at the time.. oh? Which country's Tecos then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Tecos is the spanish Tesco, he played in the SSL (Spanish supermarket league) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 oh? Which country's Tecos then? Mexico Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Martin Jol has fired the first salvo in what could be a fierce January bidding war for Derby midfielder Will Hughes. The 17 year-old has caused a stir in the Championship this season and has already been called up to the England U-21 squad. [url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-transfer-news-spurs-ready-1504330]Tottenham and Chelsea are known to be among the clubs interested in signing Hughes , while Arsenal and Liverpool have also been mentioned as possible suitors. "Believe me, there is probably 10 clubs in the Barclays Premier League having a look at him," said the Fulham boss. "He is one of these wonderful talents so he is always on lists. If you have a good scouting system, he will always be on the list but we will see." - http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/fulham-want-to-sign-chelsea-and-tottenham-1505542#.UNrUvHut62Y.twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loweman2 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Mexico Tito Villa didn't come from South America isn't mexico in south America ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Tito Villa didn't come from South America isn't mexico in south America ? its. central America Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsilks Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 its. central America Technically, there's no such place as Central America. Mexico is in the continent of North America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 So how many millions are we getting in next week ? And from whom ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Be a good career move for him Fulham, more chance of getting a game than going to a top clubs reserve team. Might not be the most financial rewarding move for us but I can't see many paying the valuations mentioned on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 We really should stick with him. There is no way we will get enough money from selling him this early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodys woman Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Palace seem to have benefited from holding on to zahar for an extra year at least, they were talking about him being a 5,000,000 man last year, now they're toward the top of the league and they're talking about 15,000,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 If Forest offered 10mil for will hughes who would take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoungUttoxRam Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 If Forest offered 10mil for will hughes who would take it me, I'd be £10million up from something I didn't own. Or have I misunderstood? Me no speak de English gud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
networker1884 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Has the article on thisisderbyshire been mentioned yet? Fulham boss Martin Jol one of 10 with eyes on Will Hughes TALENTED midfielder Will Hughes is being closely watched by up to 10 Premier League clubs, according to Fulham boss Martin Jol. Fulham are monitoring the progress of the 17-year-old Derby County player whose future is the subject of growing speculation with the January transfer window only days away. Manchester City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool are also said to be interested in the Academy product, who has started all but one of Derby's 24 League games this season. Jol has praised the impact made by Hughes. "Believe me, there are probably 10 clubs in the Barclays Premier League having a look at him," said Jol. "He is one of these wonderful talents, so he is always on lists. "If you have a good scouting system, he will always be on the list but we will see." Central midfielders Mousa Dembele, Danny Murphy and Dickson Etuhu all left Fulham in the summer and Mahamadou Diarra is soon to head off to the African Nations Cup with Mali. http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/Fulham-boss-Martin-Jol-10-eyes-Hughes/story-17691095-detail/story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramblur Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 If it meant Hughes going, and us signing a John Brayford equivelent left back (£750K), a good replacement midfielder (£1 million), and a quality striker (£2 million) I would be happy with that, we've strengthened the team and makes us a better outfit. As Bris says, however much we love Hughes, he won't single-handedly get us promoted, if he was he'd have the £20 million price tag on him, not the reported £10 million. If Clough gets half the Hughes money, and is allowed to bring in replacement players, by getting rid of a few no longer playing a part, Doyle, Davies, Tyson, Bailey would accumulatively be on £15,000+, this could be used for a good striker (£10,000) and a centre mid (£5,000) and you've replaced Hughes, added a striker, and still been left with £7 million profit! Thats without any fees we get for the players we could sell! I obviously wasn't too sharp a few days ago.You realise you've taken 4 players out of a small squad and replaced with 2 so far ?(5 players including Hughes,but then Bailey isn't featuring anyway). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I obviously wasn't too sharp a few days ago.You realise you've taken 4 players out of a small squad and replaced with 2 so far ?(5 players including Hughes,but then Bailey isn't featuring anyway). The roles that Doyle, Davies, Tyson and Bailey make are little to none, replacing them with even two players, that would be first team regulars and improve the team in general would only be a good thing, and mean they players on the bench (i.e. current first team regulars) would make our bench considerably stronger, considering as it is fairly poor at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.