BaaLocks

What an utterly ridiculous thing to say, I can't believe you even think that is a thing, I'm beyond offended you could even think I would think that like. And nothing you will say will change my point of view on that.

I've yet to hear anyone give a definition of woke that passes any sort of scrutiny. It is, as you say, just a broad brush slating with no foundation or structure behind it. Which is why I now judge anything said that includes it's use as utter gibberish - on that level alone it is a very useful word.

What an utterly ridiculous thing to say, I can't believe you even think that is a thing, I'm beyond offended you could even think I would think that like. And nothing you will say will change my point of view on that.

What an utterly ridiculous thing to say, I can't believe you even think that is a thing, I'm beyond offended you could even think I would think that like. And nothing you will say will change my point of view on that.

I can't hear Hey Jude, Waterloo or Town Called Malice at the moment

My grandad’s ciggy of choice. 

If ever I know someone whose mother died at the hands of a drunk driver when he was 12, who fought in multiple tours in Afghanistan in mortal combat, who had a wife who nearly committed suicide because of gossiping and who saw those that he knew publicly turn against him based (in part) on the colour of his wife's skin (or, at the least, where she came from) I hope I'd be a bit kinder than many have been. Even if they are being a bit / lot of a tool.

I've yet to hear anyone give a definition of woke that passes any sort of scrutiny. It is, as you say, just a broad brush slating with no foundation or structure behind it. Which is why I now judge anything said that includes it's use as utter gibberish - on that level alone it is a very useful word.

Wokers? What does that even mean ??

Penalty run ups. Marcus Rashford's looks a lot more like an attempt at the hokey cokey than trying to kick a football.

That would be a bit of a fag wouldn't it?

They apparently took their entire squad ?
 

If ever I know someone whose mother died at the hands of a drunk driver when he was 12, who fought in multiple tours in Afghanistan in mortal combat, who had a wife who nearly committed suicide because of gossiping and who saw those that he knew publicly turn against him based (in part) on the colour of his wife's skin (or, at the least, where she came from) I hope I'd be a bit kinder than many have been. Even if they are being a bit / lot of a tool.

If ever I know someone whose mother died at the hands of a drunk driver when he was 12, who fought in multiple tours in Afghanistan in mortal combat, who had a wife who nearly committed suicide because of gossiping and who saw those that he knew publicly turn against him based (in part) on the colour of his wife's skin (or, at the least, where she came from) I hope I'd be a bit kinder than many have been. Even if they are being a bit / lot of a tool.

You could almost believe that  "Look over there - MEGHAN!!!" is official government policy, the way it is eagerly churned out by their media chums and gleefully consumed by a proportion of the public. Members of the Outer Party only had to attend a Two Minutes Hate aimed at Goldstein once a day - this is just endless.
It's almost as though they were trying to divert attention from something else. Surely not?

Ah, so everybody is expected to react in exactly the same manner are they? If someone on here posted that they did multiple tours in Afghansitan, lost their mother when they were young and had a wife who had considered suicide due to people gossiping about them I somehow think they'd get a bit more sympathy than Harry is being offered.
Who cares if he got $100m for his story? Don't want to watch it then just turn over. You might run into a story on how government awarding PPE contracts during the pandemic cost the country around £2.7bn (of our money, not Netflix's or Oprah Winfreys). I'm not saying that to play some political card, but it's interesting how selective we (and I don't mean you personally - you may be furious on both counts) can be in venting our anger. Why it's almost as if the aforementioned media are steering the argument where they want it to be.

I'm no Harry (or Royal Family) fan, by any measurable metric. But this also a guy who, as a young child, saw his mother - by his version of events - all but murdered by the media and then, later, saw his wife almost sent down the same route. It's hard to deny he's had the rough end of the press and I get why he is now playing them for his own advantage (call that what you will).
I've had a bit of a WhatsApp chat going on this afternoon with a group of friends, all getting royally ('scuse the pun) getting stuck into Harry. Yet two of them on there are quick to forget they've either fallen out with their sister (in one case) and son (in the other) over money and the fall out of a divorce. I bet if someone came in and gave them chance to write a book about how they've been wronged they would leap at the chance.
He's a bit broken as a person (for reasons I understand) and is now trying to fight the Royal Family and the entire British media - something he has next to zero chance of winning. I don't see that as a reason to be a hater, but I also couldn't give three nips of poo of interest in anything he (or they) have to say.

FA Cup 3rd Round Saturday: just 10 ties kicked off at 3pm

Yup, I remember. Got in a bit of a scuffle myself in the Normo End coz I called some bloke out for shouting racist abuse at Yeboah. The steward who came to resolve it was the most massive 'person of colour' you've ever seen. Needless to say, the bloke I had been arguing with got ejected.
Happy days!!!

Yup, I remember. Got in a bit of a scuffle myself in the Normo End coz I called some bloke out for shouting racist abuse at Yeboah. The steward who came to resolve it was the most massive 'person of colour' you've ever seen. Needless to say, the bloke I had been arguing with got ejected.
Happy days!!!

Ah, so everybody is expected to react in exactly the same manner are they? If someone on here posted that they did multiple tours in Afghansitan, lost their mother when they were young and had a wife who had considered suicide due to people gossiping about them I somehow think they'd get a bit more sympathy than Harry is being offered.
Who cares if he got $100m for his story? Don't want to watch it then just turn over. You might run into a story on how government awarding PPE contracts during the pandemic cost the country around £2.7bn (of our money, not Netflix's or Oprah Winfreys). I'm not saying that to play some political card, but it's interesting how selective we (and I don't mean you personally - you may be furious on both counts) can be in venting our anger. Why it's almost as if the aforementioned media are steering the argument where they want it to be.

I'm no Harry (or Royal Family) fan, by any measurable metric. But this also a guy who, as a young child, saw his mother - by his version of events - all but murdered by the media and then, later, saw his wife almost sent down the same route. It's hard to deny he's had the rough end of the press and I get why he is now playing them for his own advantage (call that what you will).
I've had a bit of a WhatsApp chat going on this afternoon with a group of friends, all getting royally ('scuse the pun) getting stuck into Harry. Yet two of them on there are quick to forget they've either fallen out with their sister (in one case) and son (in the other) over money and the fall out of a divorce. I bet if someone came in and gave them chance to write a book about how they've been wronged they would leap at the chance.
He's a bit broken as a person (for reasons I understand) and is now trying to fight the Royal Family and the entire British media - something he has next to zero chance of winning. I don't see that as a reason to be a hater, but I also couldn't give three nips of poo of interest in anything he (or they) have to say.

The current unbeaten run in the league is 11 - 5 wins, 6 draws
Here are some notable unbeaten league runs from the relatively recent past :
1995/96 - 20 games - 13 wins, 7 draws - Jim Smith
1986/87 - 12 games - 7 wins, 5 draws - Arthur Cox
1985/86 - 11 games - 7 wins, 4 draws - Arthur Cox
2016/17 - 10 games - 8 wins, 2 draws - Steve Mac 2
2015/16 - 10 games - 8 wins, 2 draws - then 1 defeat, then another 8 games unbeaten - all under Paul Clement twice putting us briefly top of the Championship (where did it all go wrong ? )
2014/15 - 10 games - 6 wins, 4 draws - Steve Mac 1
2013/14 - 9 games - 8 wins, 1 draw - Steve Mac 1
 
 

Yup, they don't Horace Wimp out on these things.

With no penalty shoot outs?