-
Posts
11,592 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Rev in Takeover Update
See above. Had two good wins has Mel as a businessman. Well done him. Royally ducked up his third effort. Tough luck. With investments some you win, some you lose. No need for him with his wealth though to bring the whole club to its knees.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Derby blood in Takeover Update
See above. Had two good wins has Mel as a businessman. Well done him. Royally ducked up his third effort. Tough luck. With investments some you win, some you lose. No need for him with his wealth though to bring the whole club to its knees.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Ted McMinn Football Genius in Takeover Update
See above. Had two good wins has Mel as a businessman. Well done him. Royally ducked up his third effort. Tough luck. With investments some you win, some you lose. No need for him with his wealth though to bring the whole club to its knees.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Abu Derby in Takeover Update
See above. Had two good wins has Mel as a businessman. Well done him. Royally ducked up his third effort. Tough luck. With investments some you win, some you lose. No need for him with his wealth though to bring the whole club to its knees.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Hector was the best in Takeover Update
As @GenBralso said above, it seems perfectly reasonable to me. Forget profit and sustainability and amortisation calculations, they are no longer the story here. The Club clearly owes significant debt, and whilst Morris does seem to be paying the wages it equally seems clear that he isn’t prepared to immediately settle long standing debts - to HMRC, Cocu and his team, etc. Then there is MSD, and I wonder how much is owing to smaller local creditors who supply the club with services. We don’t know, because he won’t tell us nor apparently offer any guarantees to the EFL for the next 12 months. As @kevinhectoringsays there is also a legal obligation in terms of the audited accounts that are being prepared that the owners must - if liabilities exceed assets - give some tangible assurance to the Auditor that the Club can comply with Companies Act requirements as to continuing to trade and pay debts as they fall due.
-
-
-
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Mostyn6 in Picture where you, and your knee are now.
I agree. Time for protest. White Knees Matter.
-
-
-
-
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Chris_Martin in When was the last time we went 18 league matches without a win?
You were really stretching at the end mate, and accordingly it was a missed opportunity not to mention Uranus.
-
-
-
-
i-Ram reacted to Leeds Ram in Takeover Update
If i bought the club I'd accept it's my responsibility to keep maintaining and supporting it to an acceptable level.
-
i-Ram reacted to Ramarena in Takeover Update
Going into administration would obviously incur the points penalty.
It all gets messy with the ownership of ground potentially going to MSD as @i-Ram says, but would they want the rest of the club????? I struggle to see it.
If administrators were put in charge for any length of time they are immediately going to slash costs. Any staff that can be got rid of will be.
Then funds will be raised by selling any saleable assets, the likes of Buchanan, Joz, Sibley, etc going for what we can get for them.
After that there’s very little fat to cut aside from Rooney’s comparatively huge wages. So I’d imagine they’d try and work out a way to get him off the wagebill too!
-
i-Ram reacted to angieram in Takeover Update
Okay, I agree with those saying it's a mess.
So, the EFL won't lift the restrictions until we provide proof of funds. If there are no funds, we can't sell because we can't convince any buyers to take us on unless the restrictions are lifted.
Therefore, is there any other option than administration? And is the EFL going down this route because they know we can't provide proof of funds because there aren't any? Or is Mel Morris refusing to provide proof of funds because he hasn't got any left to invest or because he refuses to give the EFL the satisfaction?
There are too many unknowns.
Are the EFL being unreasonable, or Mel or both?
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Deej in Takeover Update
Administration would also almost certainly see secured creditor MSD take control of the Stadium.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from LeedsCityRam in Takeover Update
As @GenBralso said above, it seems perfectly reasonable to me. Forget profit and sustainability and amortisation calculations, they are no longer the story here. The Club clearly owes significant debt, and whilst Morris does seem to be paying the wages it equally seems clear that he isn’t prepared to immediately settle long standing debts - to HMRC, Cocu and his team, etc. Then there is MSD, and I wonder how much is owing to smaller local creditors who supply the club with services. We don’t know, because he won’t tell us nor apparently offer any guarantees to the EFL for the next 12 months. As @kevinhectoringsays there is also a legal obligation in terms of the audited accounts that are being prepared that the owners must - if liabilities exceed assets - give some tangible assurance to the Auditor that the Club can comply with Companies Act requirements as to continuing to trade and pay debts as they fall due.
-
-
i-Ram got a reaction from LeedsCityRam in Takeover Update
Administration would also almost certainly see secured creditor MSD take control of the Stadium.
-
i-Ram got a reaction from Tamworthram in Takeover Update
I refer you to a section of the bland minutes prepared after the Supporters Group Charter Meeting:
Mel Morris intended to sell the club 2 years ago, and has had to continue to subsidise the club ever since then – though he never intended to. This cannot continue in perpetuity.
It would be fair to say the rational reason you are looking for is that Morris is two years into drip financing the club, something he clearly never wanted to do, and he also made it clear that he will offer no guarantees to continue doing so.