-
Posts
10,292 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
GboroRam got a reaction from TigerTedd in Simulation theory
So the stars are like the mountains at the edge of Skyrim, just for decoration and you can't actually get there?
-
-
-
-
GboroRam reacted to Tyler Durden in 11 Points
Sheffield United only have to take 1 point every 3 games to equal our record.
When you say that I still can't believe now how we contrived to generate that points tally.
It'll never be beaten.
-
-
GboroRam reacted to Stive Pesley in New joke thread (trigger alert, may offend if you want it to)
We've all been there Keir...don't worry
-
-
-
-
-
GboroRam reacted to Wolfie20 in Unexpected headline of the week pt 2
They're the Bill, they're entitled to have a gander.
-
-
GboroRam got a reaction from Steve How Hard? in 11 Points
That record will not be broken in our lifetime. Quote me, screenshot me, X me.
-
GboroRam reacted to ramit in Russell Brand
The objective intelligent thing to do is to examine issues from all sides, to follow the evidence wherever it may lead. A truth does not mind who speaks it, it remains true, no matter who utters it, a nut, or you.
-
GboroRam reacted to YorkshireRam in Russell Brand
He's examining the provenance of a source, that's the objectively intelligent thing to do. If you shared a video of David Icke, pointing out he believes lizard people are real would be pertinent to his overall credibility. If you want to present a contrary stance, then make sure your evidence comes from a reliable, credible source, or that it cites its references- it's not hard (unless you're trying to support some weird conspiracy theory when the only people that agree with you are nutjobs)
-
GboroRam reacted to ariotofmyown in Russell Brand
From the above, I've got this crazy feeling that this Watson fella is probably cool with what Brand has been "alleged" to have done.
-
GboroRam reacted to Jubbs in Russell Brand
So you want me to watch a video that that clown as made?
I'm sure far-right conspiracy theorist, Paul - who is banned on Facebook and Instagram for hate speech, regularly worked/works with Alex Jones(who still owes $1.5b to the families of Sandy Hook victims), believes in 9/11 and New World Order conspiracy theories and openly opposes to Islam - is going to have a REALLY balanced view on what Russell Brand has done.
Have a look a the "Race and ethnicity" part of his Wikipedia.
-
-
GboroRam reacted to Magicman in Electric Vehicles
EV are over hype once they load the charges they become expensive not only to buy but run. The great climate change hoax is being exposed and once the subsidy scams for green energy are lumped into it its all a con trick to control the sheeple.
-
GboroRam reacted to BaaLocks in Electric Vehicles
It's just amazing how chaotic our government is. They win one bi-election in Uxbridge by opposing ULEZ and now some think tank consultants seem to think that their only hope of victory in the next election is to embrace the petrol engine. It is just heartbreaking to watch
-
GboroRam got a reaction from Chester40 in Hi tech toys you had as a kid
Was looking at all the stuff we couldn't afford for me as a lad getting jealous, then I remembered I had this bad boy.
-
GboroRam got a reaction from therealhantsram in Hi tech toys you had as a kid
Was looking at all the stuff we couldn't afford for me as a lad getting jealous, then I remembered I had this bad boy.
-
-
GboroRam got a reaction from Ramathorn in Russell Brand
It's a difficult subject, one I've tried to not get involved.
I fully understand why police won't prosecute on the basis of a confession alone. It's been proved unreliable before.
I also think there's a difference between people making up their minds about the conduct of an individual and deciding they don't want to associate with them, and a criminal conviction resulting in legal outcomes.
I also have no problem with the concept of investigative journalism. Lots of cases only come to light after journalists start to investigate. Real journalism, not the kind we're mostly left with at the moment.
I also don't believe there's a bald guy stroking a cat in the top office of the BBC, like a bond villain. A lot of people turned a blind eye to some terrible behaviour. Did they know the full story? Perhaps not. Did they not ask too many questions, out of self preservation? I'd not be surprised. Did some people treat him like he was untouchable? I reckon so.
Has he changed his views to garner support from a demographic possibly more relaxed with abusive behaviour? Possibly, but it does let off the hook some people who never objected while he remained under the radar.
A lot of people have enabled his behaviour. You can't even blame "the sign of the times" like we might have if this was the 70s or 80s.