GboroRam

Thank you @Lander Love them so much. Just hoping they’ll got over the 25 layers of clothes I’ll be wearing today 🤣

Three shirts are ready for @B4’s Sisterand family today ❤️
 
 

Rapidly unplanned disassembles. 

Ok. Nice posts about the pretty rockets from now on, by weight of popular opinion. 

Yeah, sorry mod, my only excuse is a high fever
Fascinating discussion, do carry on

I would call it genocide. One of the strongest military states in the world killing civilians by the thousands. That's not warfare Leeds.

That's how i read it!!!

Or the owner was given a suspended sentence after he had been shot dead. Makes a change from their usual spelling mistakes. 

Right. So, the police shot a dog owner, and were given a suspended sentence for shooting a man? 
Good grammar from the Grauniad. 

Right. So, the police shot a dog owner, and were given a suspended sentence for shooting a man? 
Good grammar from the Grauniad. 

Certainly in his post lockdown period.
 
Couldn't we just give him the freedom of bubbles?

It is, if you are not a Palestinian. Especially one of those that was born there but never allowed to return to the country of their birth by the 'democratic' state of Israel. 
It's interesting to speculate what the situation in the Middle East would look like now if Iran had been allowed to keep it's nascent democracy in the 1950s, rather than having the US and UK destroy it, and replace it with a pliant, if brutal, dictator. I guess that's something we will never know. 
It seems to me that the Hamas attack was intended to prolong the war with Israel and prevent peace at all costs. A twisted and immoral strategy no doubt, but the overwhelming response from the IDF is probably exactly what they hoped for. 

Dead ringer for his avatar, I reckon. The Derby Kung Fu Panda. 

Love my shirt @Lander. Thanks so much x 

@B4’s Sister

Until the last week it has been a long time since I had been at a Derby Match. My Dad has said I’ve probably seen some of the best football so far this season. So, this thread is starting with genuine positivity from me, as my brother Daniel (B4) would also have done. This match means so much more to the Beavis family than any result. We want everyone to wave their scraves and flanges (not literally, ladies 🙈) and raise the roof for both DCFC and Daniel. Please share the details of the applause far and wide. 
I’m reliably told I need to predict a 3-0 win to Derby. 
My dad, Andy and I, will be in the east stand, stairway 35. We’ll be having a drink before the match and at halftime. Please do come and say hello. 
 
#COYR   #GetReadyToRoar  #BeMoreB4 

I never met him, but I feel I knew him so well. 
Sad, desperately sad news. Condolences to all who knew and loved him. 

I find Twitter's defence laughable though - they are admitting that their algorithms did serve ads against "the content in the article" (nice euphemism lads) - which is entirely the point. 
The fact that it's focused on the huge corps who doubtless spend the most money on Twitter advertising is because that's what hurts, but it's not the point
It's about the principle of serving ads against hateful content. It doesn't actually matter who the advertisers are, and it's not "gaming the system" to prove that. I do a lot of work with software code bug hunters and vulnerability management / penetration testing - we don't consider them to be "gaming the system" when they force niche scenarios to expose issues. We thank them for it
Which in my opinion is what Twitter should be doing if they want to win back the trust of advertisers. Say "we thank Media Matters for bringing this flaw in our advertising algorithms to our attention and we are taking steps to ensure that NO adverts get served against extremis content, no matter how blue the tick the extremist paid for is...".
Doubling down and saying "well...most of the time we try not to serve ads next to racist posts, but as Media Matters have shown we can't promise it" is not going to help them get advertisers back 😂
 
 

Clear calls for extreme violence are against t&cs.
How about ambiguous calls for extreme violence or clear calls for moderate violence?
Glad to see Trump's ban was over turned for his part in the murders at the Capitol. 

Is it? I mean, he openly said he wanted twitter to be a free speech zone, and his early actions were to reinstate far right accounts. 
You can't be a free speech absolutist without accepting the far right will post nazi rhetoric. He bought it to stop the limitations on the far right. I can't see how that's in any way libellous. I