Jump to content

Day

Admin
  • Posts

    67,284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Day

  1. 1 hour ago, Ghost of Clough said:

    Wrong. Clowes is a supporter and will be on the DCFC Board 😉 

    I'm sure many have chosen not to read the infomation provided by the club, but the headlines are:

    • The initial view is to meet quarterly with the DCFC Board but I imagine the regularity could be adjusted in the future.
    • The SB will have the power to veto against key changes - colours, badge, stadium, league, etc...
    • They will mainly discuss accounts, diversity, sponsorship values, and corporate values.

    Leave the club colours, badge, stadium alone. Don’t be signing up to any Super League.

    Avoid those sponsorships from betting companies from the far east that don’t even appear to be trading.

    Sorted.

  2. 1 hour ago, angieram said:

    Totally understand where you're coming from, David. 

    It's sad that the people most reluctant to take on these roles are often the ones who'd do them very well. 

    There are no pros, just plenty of cons in my view anyway.

    Having been there in what appears to be a similar role, it’s a thankless task.

    Can I ask though, what exactly is the difference between being on the supporters board and the supporters charter group?

    If it’s simply someone that’s independent from a fan group, how do they gauge the views from the wider fanbase? 

  3. 34 minutes ago, Mucker1884 said:

    Brilliant!

    @David, You're in.

    Congratulations.  

    Just to be clear, and to avoid any more nominations sarcastic or not. I have absolutely no interest in the role.

    None whatsoever. Zero. Zilch. 

    Whoever takes it on, good luck, be prepared for all kinds of abuse and repeatedly told “you don’t represent me”.

    I’ll just stay over here in this little corner of the internet and keep this place online for you all. I’m happy doing that.

  4. 1 minute ago, ariotofmyown said:

    There seems to be 2 different aspects to this never ending debate.

    One of them is "Has Twitter is becoming a hopeless platform to use since Musk has took over?"

    The other one is "Is Musk a champion of free speech or a vile moron actively encouraging and amplifying conspiracy theories and extreme points of view."

    I think @David has made a few posts on the first point, whilst deliberatley calling out it's nothing to do with the second.

    Is there anyone who does believe Musk is a legend for his free speech crusade, but also thinks he has turned Twitter into a bit of mess?

    Conversely, does anyone depise Musk but think his new and improved Twitter is amazing from a functional perspective?

    You have 

    a) People like myself that are simply annoyed by Twitter changes (excluding free speech)

    b) Musk fans, that will argue he can do no wrong.

    And last but not least

    c) Left v Right. Left being accused of trying to rid the internet of any opposing views, hailing Musk as a hero. Right being accused of vile behaviour that has no place in society.

     

    Search out the old politics threads, it’s the same opposition. Exactly the same.

    It’s impossible to have any discussion within this board now with the same old battle lines being drawn.

    We‘re up to 23 pages on a business rebrand topic, yet 90% isn’t about X, it’s Elon, Tesla, Crypto and the free speech argument.

×
×
  • Create New...