NottsRam77

How many points deduction will Reading get based on these results?
Reading made operating losses of £43.5million, compared to £40.7million the previous year, while accumulated losses totalled £138million.
Wages were 211 per cent of revenue - slight progress somewhat compared with 226 per cent the previous year. Nevertheless, this is is still above the level recommended by UEFA, which is 70 per cent.
My guess is a fixed penalty £100 fine and a kindly reminder to keep their losses under £100million next submittal.

I do, but I'm not telling. 

Snog
Marry
Avoid

My bet is this is all about face saving negotiations for the EFL.. The voices against us have to get some change for their efforts. The voices with us will be saying accept something just to close it. 
3 points I am guessing .. not because we did anything wrong but because they have to give us something to justify their existence, 
push it too far and their own integrity and motives will be questioned by those outside DCFC. 
It stinks. Partisan, rules made up as they go along. Expressing disappointment when the can’t appeal a decision made by their own independent committee ? Thats not a governing body. 
I am appalled 

If we're really 'locked in discussions' about the extent of our punishment then there's no need to explicitly state that we have failed P&S, it's implied. No P&S failure means no need for such discussions. 

When do the accounts for 1066 need to be in. Accounts for 1666 were destroyed in the fire, including those backed up on flash drives. We can only do so much. Lol.

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

The choice of words in that Sky banner is interesting...assuming it's accurate of course. 
"Restated" implies we've just amended the amortisation numbers for straight line. 
"Revised and...."  implies we may have made other amendments, perhaps around releasing some further profits from the previous stadium revaluation. If so, this might have been necessary to improve our ffp position and also would likely be the reason for the pre-submission dialogue with the EFL. 
Who says accountancy cannot be interesting? Such freedom and potential for skulduggery.... ?

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

They wanted us to show the workings out. 
 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

My take on that is that the accounts were submitted last week on the original deadline
then “after constructive discussions” we were asked to clarify something or provide documentation to support what we have submitted… which we have now done 

Personally, I like the little feature Sofascore has where they show the momentum of attack across the 90 minutes of the game

Don’t spoil the night buddy

Looks like they really didn't want to upset the Wolves keeper by going into the area....

 
 
 
 

It looked like one of our central defenders pointed directing to McDonald to play the ball back (straight into Sharp's path) when there was no one around the full back and he could easily have turned with it and brought the ball forward. All symptomatic of this disease of playing backwards as a first thought. So it wasn't all the youngster's fault, but of course it was mainly on him as he was facing our goal so should have seen Sharp lurking there.

Poo bag

This is a smashing performance whatever happens. If Mel can just sort his poo out the future is extremely encouraging. We don’t even need much, the building blocks are there, we can cope with free transfers and loans, we just need this bloody embargo lifting.

In other news, The Pope is a Catholic. ?

Erm