Reviving an Old Debate

[Mostyn6]

39 minutes ago, David said:

It’s good, but not quite ready.

 

you missed him getting crisps out of the fridge!

[Olton Ram]

The thread title had me worried. I thought it might be the ageless "bring back the blue shorts" debate

[Rammeister]

Never mind the eye- what’s with that club badge?

When did we replace this?

[Boycie]

3 hours ago, DarkFruitsRam7 said:

So I believed for 18 years of my life!

[Bob The Badger]

2 hours ago, BathRam72 said:

BEAT you to it ?

That was a stroke of luck.

[LazloW]

You can only have a debate where there are two or more sides to an issue. You can’t have a debate about a fact. It is a fact that the emblem has an eye and has always had an eye. It’s absolutely ******* obvious there is an eye. Nothing, absolutely nothing to debate. Either change the title of the thread to ‘Reviving an old misconception’ and/or close it.

Edited May 26, 2022 by LazloW

[Gee SCREAMER !!]

1 hour ago, Olton Ram said:

The thread title had me worried. I thought it might be the ageless "bring back the blue shorts" debate

I'm not sure that the 80's kit with the blue shorts had an eye more a random dot.  

Both need more discussion

[Ghost of Clough]

2 minutes ago, LazloW said:

You can only have a debate where there are two or more sides to an issue. You can’t have a debate about a fact. It is a fact that the emblem has an eye and has always had an eye. It’s absolutely ******* obvious there is an eye. Nothing, absolutely nothing to debate. Either change the title of the thread to ‘Reviving an old misconception’ and/or close it.

The eye way a late addition at some point in the early Pride Park years. Apparently people had gone well over 20 years thinking the horn was the eye.

[The Scarlet Pimpernel]

1 hour ago, Ghost of Clough said:

The eye way a late addition at some point in the early Pride Park years. Apparently people had gone well over 20 years thinking the horn was the eye.

And those same people who think the horn was the eye reckon they can assess a football match...........Staggering!!

[DarkFruitsRam7]

2 hours ago, LazloW said:

You can only have a debate where there are two or more sides to an issue. You can’t have a debate about a fact. It is a fact that the emblem has an eye and has always had an eye. It’s absolutely ******* obvious there is an eye. Nothing, absolutely nothing to debate. Either change the title of the thread to ‘Reviving an old misconception’ and/or close it.

Nah.

#ModPrivilege