Animal is a Ram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 I notice Bristol St Motors now sponsors added time - I don't remember who did this before, was there one this season? I know they were announced as 'club partners' before a game (Forest?), so there's a few more £ in the kitty. At least MM got Rams TV right. That could prove to be a real help. I know I'll be putting in a tenner for the Hudders game. Steve How Hard?, whiteroseram, RadioactiveWaste and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 1 minute ago, StarterForTen said: If truly independent, just imagine if the Panel return a decision that suggests the grievances are due to EFL process rather than Club misdemeanour? 3 Arbitration experts on panel. 1 EFL appointed 1 Boro/Wycombe appointed 1 Administrators appointed All supposed to have no bias Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 Also, aren't the EFL holding some funds back I.e TV money etc? Does that mean that upon takeover the club receives a not insignificant cash injection when those funds are released? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 Just now, Tombo said: Also, aren't the EFL holding some funds back I.e TV money etc? Does that mean that upon takeover the club receives a not insignificant cash injection when those funds are released? No . Money is to pay football creditors. Of which none are either Boro or Wycombe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Tombo said: Also, aren't the EFL holding some funds back I.e TV money etc? Does that mean that upon takeover the club receives a not insignificant cash injection when those funds are released? This was being withheld as a result of us not paying a transfer instalment due - this was sorted and we've now had the TV money, I'm sure. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: No . Money is to pay football creditors. Of which none are either Boro or Wycombe. We hope if the case goes in Administrators favour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 9 minutes ago, Curtains said: 3 Arbitration experts on panel. 1 EFL appointed 1 Boro/Wycombe appointed 1 Administrators appointed All supposed to have no bias Is that a joint one with two different arguments from both parasites or a different one for both the parasite clubs owners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atherstoneram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: This was being withheld as a result of us not paying a transfer instalment due - this was sorted and we've now had the TV money, I'm sure. While we are in administration the EFL retain the tv money from the live matches in the possibility the club gets liquidated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 1 minute ago, atherstoneram said: While we are in administration the EFL retain the tv money from the live matches in the possibility the club gets liquidated. I would imagine 1 appointed by Boro and Wycombe RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 You might have thought that the premiership would ask all their clubs to donate £2 million each to assist Derby county carrying on as it would save them a lot of money in the long run - I mean 13 players have gone to premiership clubs in the last two seasons from Derby county - I know it’s only humorous but it really is the golden goose with a choice of British eggs or foreign eggs which seem to cost a tremendous amount after playing 12 games in France and the like, if you get the point. archram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 DO we need to crowdfund Nick De Marco? We need his "what I'm having for dinner" tweets in this fight. Curtains and Derby4Me 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 98.2 Within 14 days of service of the Notice of Arbitration, each party shall serve written notice on The League and all other parties to the arbitration of the details of the individual they wish to appoint to act as an arbitrator in the arbitration requested. Above from EFL rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 32 minutes ago, mice_elf said: They did get their best ever Player from Guernsey, which is near enough Due South of So'ton, so that gives 'em a 360 degree reach by my reckoning..........................................................................................................................................................Matt Le Tissier He was rubbish wasn't he!! ? I knew Matt quite well when I lived in Southampton back in 1995 (my then wife was good friends with his then wife). Really nice guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winktheram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 16 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: No . Money is to pay football creditors. Of which none are either Boro or Wycombe. ....yet..... sorry being mischievous assuming the outcome of the 'independent arbitrator' RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Curtains said: 98.2 Within 14 days of service of the Notice of Arbitration, each party shall serve written notice on The League and all other parties to the arbitration of the details of the individual they wish to appoint to act as an arbitrator in the arbitration requested. Above from EFL rules Do we have this much time? And we need to get it right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 This is the bit I worry about even though I’m not clear still if it’s EFL arbitration process that’s happening that’s why Rams Trust letter is important 101.1 If the arbitrators fail to agree on any issue they shall decide by a majority and a majority decision shall be binding on all of them. No dissenting judgment shall be produced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Sparkle said: Do we have this much time? And we need to get it right We certainly do. The administrators seem confident but so does the Wycombe chairman . Civil Court adjudication seems a likely outcome after arbitration to me. Hope I’m wrong Edited February 1, 2022 by Curtains RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Curtains said: We certainly do. The administrators seem confident but so does the Wycombe chairman There's something about it that keeps niggling me. Like Boro and Wycombe think they have some kind of smoking gun evidence to bust out in the hearing. We'll see. Curtains 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 1 minute ago, RadioactiveWaste said: There's something about it that keeps niggling me. Like Boro and Wycombe think they have some kind of smoking gun evidence to bust out in the hearing. We'll see. Snap. For it to get this far, they must be very confident they stand a chance. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriggRam Posted February 1, 2022 Share Posted February 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: There's something about it that keeps niggling me. Like Boro and Wycombe think they have some kind of smoking gun evidence to bust out in the hearing. We'll see. The EFL have there back........that's what's worrying me jono, Indy and RadioactiveWaste 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now