eddie Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 54 minutes ago, TroyDyer said: That's my point. People are making stuff up because no one actually knows. Do we deserve to know? Or should Mel just be allowed to run it like a multi national, and do as he wishes? If it's the latter then that's not a football club. That's a McDonalds franchise. I like McDonalds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 47 minutes ago, YouRams said: Read my next posts. Censoring is the wrong wording but I'd guess that's the way it will go based on not letting them have an interview today. Translation... I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, eddie said: Translation... I don't know. I know I believe a journalist with links over silence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 2 hours ago, eddie said: I never hear anybody say anything. Put some new batteries in your hearing aids then you stingy old bugger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 1 minute ago, CornwallRam said: Put some new batteries in your hearing aids then you stingy old bugger Cost isn't an issue to me. You are paying for them with your taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 2 hours ago, Ewe Ram said: And anyway I think Radio Derby could have prevented all of this if they'd been less mardy. If they'd said 'sorry we aren't able to bring you interviews today' instead of 'The club have refused to speak to Radio Derby' non of this thread would have been written. They wanted the controversy and we wouldn't have had to have sat through Hotel California... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkleyram Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 1 hour ago, rammieib said: Yep. Ashley gets bad publicity for his business ownership granted, but he now stays very much behind the scenes up at Newcastle. There is a steady ship going on up there and a good vibe in that city. We have a guy sacking managers too frequently, withholding information I think supporters have a right to know and not restricting the local press because it appears he didn't like what they said. (Even if he didn't make the decision, he is responsible). As a club we are being slaughtered in the National press, sit in a shocking league position, I don't see a bright future and it's on his watch. So that is my reasoning. Just as a matter of interest rammieib exactly what information is being witheld by Mel that we supporters have a right to know, just so's I know what I'm supposed to be angry about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, ilkleyram said: Just as a matter of interest rammieib exactly what information is being witheld by Mel that we supporters have a right to know, just so's I know what I'm supposed to be angry about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRBee Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 2 hours ago, Ewe Ram said: And anyway I think Radio Derby could have prevented all of this if they'd been less mardy. If they'd said 'sorry we aren't able to bring you interviews today' instead of 'The club have refused to speak to Radio Derby' non of this thread would have been written. They wanted the controversy You may be a Derby supporter but you clearly don't know what 'mardy' means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 8 minutes ago, DRBee said: You may be a Derby supporter but you clearly don't know what 'mardy' means. Test him! Ask him what a jitty is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 9 minutes ago, cannable said: Test him! Ask him what a jitty is! When he chews that one over, will he conclude that it's claarty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 Ewe Ram is a lady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 5 hours ago, MrsRam said: Ewe Ram is a lady. Thank you. It's hard to remain dignified here sometimes and I don't always manage it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninos Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 9 hours ago, loweman2 said: He was concieved the night we won the World Cup when Martin peters and Geoff hurst got it on !! did they get it on like donkey kong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toddy Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 So all this is Radio Derby's fault then and nothing what so ever to do with the club? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 Just now, toddy said: So all this is Radio Derby's fault then and nothing what so ever to do with the club? If that's what you prefer to think. You can take anyone's opinions and turn them round. All I said was that they made it all into a huge issue when they could have avoided it by waiting and giving reasons which has caused more negativity, the very thing that fans say they don't want. It appears fans actually prefer rumours, bad mouthing and negative spin on everything. I'm out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted October 2, 2016 Author Share Posted October 2, 2016 9 hours ago, Ewe Ram said: And anyway I think Radio Derby could have prevented all of this if they'd been less mardy. If they'd said 'sorry we aren't able to bring you interviews today' instead of 'The club have refused to speak to Radio Derby' non of this thread would have been written. They wanted the controversy But then the fans would be wanting to know why... We spend all our time wanting things to be transparent and then when they are we moan!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toddy Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 18 minutes ago, Ewe Ram said: If that's what you prefer to think. You can take anyone's opinions and turn them round. All I said was that they made it all into a huge issue when they could have avoided it by waiting and giving reasons which has caused more negativity, the very thing that fans say they don't want. It appears fans actually prefer rumours, bad mouthing and negative spin on everything. I'm out. The wall came down in Berlin for a reason. Let's look at the facts, - no interview with RD because RD say something the board does not like to hear, even if it's true. Should always be transparency at the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 12 minutes ago, toddy said: The wall came down in Berlin for a reason. Let's look at the facts, - no interview with RD because RD say something the board does not like to hear, even if it's true. Should always be transparency at the club. Why? Is it because we've gotten used to it so we expect transparency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariotofmyown Posted October 2, 2016 Share Posted October 2, 2016 We need to hound mel out the club and let another mega rich fan take over the club. But of his successor doesn't get instant results, there will be hell to pay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.