eddie Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 He's impressed me in the last couple of weeks, seems to have fitted in nicely with the rest of the lads. What do we reckon, £250k enough to get him in in January? "Sign him up! Sign him up! Sign him up!" If you're forking that kind of cash out, I'm happy to bung a fiver in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozza Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Nah , he's crap , send him back to Spurs , or wherever it is he came from.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abertawe_ram Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 If you're forking that kind of cash out, I'm happy to bung a fiver in. Sadly I misread the screen at the ATM, turns out I actually only have £2.50 Maybe our famous fan from JLS could chuck some cash in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4ev6is Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 I think we should sign him permeantly as he offers something different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 I think we should sign him permeantly as he offers something different. I agree hes been very good for us no doubt about it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Can't see Levy letting him go for less than 500k, may take up to a mil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Daly Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 They slipped in the fact that Spurs have the option of another year into the DET article this morning. Clearly Derby want to warn us, in the usual fashion, that getting him on a permanent may not be a forgone conclusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 A source, can't reveal my flavour, says Forest are monitoring the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Can't see Levy letting him go for less than 500k, may take up to a mil? Can't see it really, although Levy could do try to be a dick. Naturally if that were the case, Forest would then step in with a bid of £7.5 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Can't see it really, although Levy could do try to be a dick. Naturally if that were the case, Forest would then step in with a bid of £7.5 million.Wouldn't their card get declined? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 He smiles and just says, "we'll just have to wait and see..." in his latest interview on rams player. Looks and sounds happy to be here, also says there's no better feeling than actually playing and winning them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 He smiles and just says, "we'll just have to wait and see..." in his latest interview on rams player. Looks and sounds happy to be here, also says there's no better feeling than actually playing and winning them. I'm confident. I think he'd want to come... even if another Championship team came in, I think he'd want to play here and for Steve McClaren. Only thing that would change that on his part would likely be silly money wages being offered. Which I can't see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 I'm confident. I think he'd want to come... even if another Championship team came in, I think he'd want to play here and for Steve McClaren. Only thing that would change that on his part would likely be silly money wages being offered. Which I can't see. We're in a good position, he seems well suited to us anyway. I think our chances of keeping him will only improve if we're still doing well, so maybe it's down to him as much as anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 They slipped in the fact that Spurs have the option of another year into the DET article this morning. Clearly Derby want to warn us, in the usual fashion, that getting him on a permanent may not be a forgone conclusion That one year option takes his price from around £250k to £750k. They are so cute with finances. I can't believe we all thought we had got a bargain from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramblur Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Wouldn't their card get declined? Probably be the joker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramblur Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 That one year option takes his price from around £250k to £750k. They are so cute with finances. I can't believe we all thought we had got a bargain from them. Never really worked out this option business.If,for instance,a club signs a player on a 2 year deal with the option of a further year,does that mean the club are guaranteed the 3 years should they so wish,without any say for the player? If so you may be right,and I suspect you are. Looking at the Burke situation,we don't actually know if Brum wanted him as a player this season,or if the extension was their way of trying to increase his transfer value.If the latter,it may have backfired as they will be back to square one next month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 This might be the next Bosman ruling in the courts as it's such a one sided deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwram1973 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 If they wanted a mill, i'd still go for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramblur Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Having thought again about this options business,logic now tells me that the option must probably be binding on the player,otherwise there'd be little point in the option.In the example I gave,if the 3rd year weren't binding on the player,the club might just as well offer the 2 year contract and then try to negotiate an extension if both parties were amenable. One might point out that the option would likely be on pre determined terms,but on the other hand the player could simply reject the option (if it weren't binding) and look for better terms,thus little different to the 2 year contract with further negotiation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 That one year option takes his price from around £250k to £750k. They are so cute with finances. I can't believe we all thought we had got a bargain from them. I never knew that clubs could invoke a one year option two years in a row. Simon Dawkins' contract with Spurs expired in June 2013 and the club exercised a one year option at that time. http://spursplayers.blogspot.co.uk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.