-
Posts
250 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Foxy Ram in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Zag zig in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from The Scarlet Pimpernel in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Ramslad1992 in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Kernow in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Ramifications in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from rammieib in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Indyram in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Kathcairns in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob got a reaction from Ramarena in The Administration Thread
And right there is where Gibson's argument fails.
Genuinely appreciate you coming on though Will.
-
Ramrob reacted to Day in Oi, behave you lot, we don’t need more fines and sanctions
Is basically the message from the club, should go without saying really but here we are.
No mention of what anti-social behaviour has been going on both home and away that could land the club in trouble, would assume pyro, damage to stadiums, fighting, going on the pitch….might also be an early warning to all those going up to the Riverside at the weekend.
Behave yourselves
-
Ramrob reacted to ariotofmyown in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Decent 6 a side team if we go under. Bielik as sweeper/keeper/playmaker, othet 5 running round like crazy.
-
Ramrob reacted to MK-Ram in The Administration Thread
Regardless of what anyone thinks about certain MPs due to their affiliations, I have had experience of working alongside Heather, albeit a number of years ago. If she is saying she finds something unacceptable then I trust her that she will pursue it as far as she can.
-
Ramrob reacted to B4ev6is in Feeling deflated
Look buddy we shall raise again and when we do we shall stick two fingers to lot of them.
-
Ramrob reacted to BucksRam in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
This really is death by a thousand cuts isn't it. Not sure how much more we can take of this.
-
-
Ramrob reacted to Indy in The Administration Thread
I think we should not concede ground we don’t have to. Administrators have been trying the is tactic in the hope of getting reciprocal movement from others, and all that’s happened is we’ve lost ground.
Firstly, we don’t just concede that we gained an unfair advantage from breaking the rules. The stadium valuation was legit. The amortisation process was found to be I. The rules (although an acknowledged risk with losses being built up in the future). The panels specifically said there was no deliberate attempt to cheat. The only thing we breached was a trumped up charge that, in retrospect, looks like the EFL concocted for the sole purpose of meeting the criteria of their back room deal to enable Boro to take action against us.
Secondly, the panel considering Boro’s attempt to be added as an interested party specifically says that if any financial advantage was gained by us, it didn’t translate into direct responsibility for Boro’s failures. If there was a case for compo for Boro, it was in the power of the independent panels to award it and they ruled against it.
I agree that their final claims that they would have achieved anything had they got in the playoffs is so ludicrous it beggars belief.
-
Ramrob reacted to Jimbo Ram in The Administration Thread
The Gibbon will just love it if the Rams fans lose it at his ground, fighting, running on the pitch etc etc. We will get possibly a points deduction and large fine which is the last thing we need. Let us try and keep our composure, whatever the provocation and beat them both on the pitch and in the courts.....
-
Ramrob reacted to Rambam in The Administration Thread
Has this been mentioned? Ryan Bourne says on Twitter he’s written to the EFL. This sums it up perfectly.
-
Ramrob reacted to Dean Saunder’s hat trick in The Administration Thread
This saga is so infuriating, absolute shambles. A football debt is like any other debt surely? Non payment of an amount owed for services provided, whether that be £3.50 for a pint, £200k for a house or £8m outstanding for Beilik. You enter into a contract whether written or verbal for goods or services provided I.e. a legitimate debt if not paid. The amount owed is clearly defined. If one party is claiming they might have made X if Y had / had not happened then it’s a claim for “projected loss of damages” no? So, how the hell does a claim for damages or compensation become defined as a debt?
Surely it has to be agreed by both parties that services or goods have been provided without payment? And the value had to have been agreed upon. A debt is transactional. No transaction has taken place. A claim. For loss of earnings has been made essentially. But not a cut and dry loss of earnings in the sense of “I’m going to make £2k this week but I didn’t because I was in a car accident that was someone else's fault and if they hadn’t hit me I was guaranteed to make £2k”But, in the sense of, “if I wasn’t in a car accident, I might have made £2k, or I might have made £4m or I might have not made anything.”
This whole thing is an absolute farce. The governing body that sets the rules by which we operate has set the penalty as minus 9 points plus 12 for entering administration. So by the logic of allowing the claims by Middlesborough and Wycombe they’re essentially saying, anyone affected by our actions can make a claim for compensation against us regardless of that fact that they as the governing body, have already decided on the offence and set the punishment.
Meanwhile, instead of standing up and leading and helping to find a pragmatic solution or trying to mediate, they pass the buck back to all the parties in disagreement and say “you sort it out”
Absolute flipping nonsense
-
-
-
Ramrob reacted to TheresOnlyWanChope in Derby fined £10k
Their goalkeeper is to blame for a lot of it. He should have been sent off anyway.
-
-
Ramrob reacted to Ram@Lincoln in Tom Glick has left The Panthers- is he part of the Appleby group?
I don't mind the odd Connor Sammon's when the likes of Martin, Ward, Forsyth and Eustace being given new life too after getting left to rot by former clubs and not forgetting the Scottish scouting trips to get Bryson and Russell. There isn't any club that'll have 100% success rates, on the large, Clough had a very good record for signing players who would last the length of time, and if they didn't they were cheap enough to flog on without too much effort. I'd much rather that the likes of Camara, Blackman, Anya etc being bought for big money on big wages, barely playing and leaving us for free/being paid to leave.