Jump to content

sage

Member+
  • Posts

    24,553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sage

  1. 3 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said:

    I went to see Catfish and the Bottlemen a few years back, not long after it had opened. The layout limits it, and the sound quality was toss. Maybe it's improved since, but all it seems to be used for is spoken stuff (comedy, panto, etc)

    Hopefully the Becketwell venue will be good when it opens.

    We need a 2-3000 venue.

  2. 1 hour ago, ap04 said:

    I watched the actual game -as I assume did you- so have 100% of the info, why on earth would I downgrade to an estimate of what I just watched? Why use a pre-shot model when I have the post-shot version that actually happened?

    xG is an estimate for teams or games you haven't watched (and even then it's very hit-and-miss if not useless for individual games)

     

    A great example of the flaws of xG when used in isolation. It gives 0.15 or less for 3 of the goals (which should always measure 1), just 0.1 for their open goal (as close to a goal as it can get), 0.15 for the Nelson, Collins and Cbt openings which were all poor attempts (and 2 of which in the same sequence), and zero for their penalty claim which if given would be almost 1.

     

    Good Lord. The quality of the shot itself has no bearing on the xg.

    It's the percentage chance of each chance scoring.

     

  3. 3 minutes ago, Crewton said:

    Don't forget that in his first season, he was played everywhere but his best position by 3 different managers. In his second and final season under Rowett, he played as second striker, scored 21 goals in the Championship, won the Championship Golden Boot and 3 club PoS awards and then moved to Burnley in the PL for a decent profit.

    I'm not sure what else you expected from him.

    I'm referring to his career as a whole.

    He is a player, who at best, if you tailor your system to suit him, he will score 20 goals at championship level.

    Is that good for the team though?

     

     

  4. 9 hours ago, Ellafella said:

    Half-marks allowed; please rate all subs. Closes Thursday @ 18:00. Results by Thursday 22:00. Average is 6.00. Therefore, when a sub steps on the pitch he is on 6 -that's the baseline. Also indicate ATG (at the game) Or Tv.

    1Wildsmith 6

    2Wilson 6.5

    35Nelson 7

    6Cashin 7.5

    17Sibley 6

    23Ward 8

    16Thompson 6.5

    12Smith 7

    4Hourihane 6

    32Adams 8

    27Blackett-Taylor 6.5

    14Washington 6

    11Méndez-Laing 7

    9Collins 6.5

    10Waghorn 6

     

  5. 8 hours ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said:

    Well he was League 1 player of the year at Watford and again with us when we decided playing him on the wing really wasn't the best idea. He was 3 seconds ahead of any forward in this division ability wise when played correctly.  

    He had 3 good seasons in 12. 3 seasons when everything he hit went in.

    We got our money back but wasn't a good signing. Like Ince his figures look better than the actual experience 

  6. 52 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said:

    Why? I think my points are valid. I’m confident we’ll get promoted and have been for a while.

    I’m confident we would struggle with Warne as manager in the Championship.

    Surely I’m allowed an opinion 🤷‍♂️

    The content i largely agree with, but the timing...

×
×
  • Create New...