-
Posts
3,232 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
nottingram got a reaction from Zag zig in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from Zag zig in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Crewton in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from 61GT in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Wsm-ram in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Carnero in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from FlyBritishMidland in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Ramarena in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Foxy Ram in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Andicis in The Administration Thread
I think if anything it is quite a relief that a large part of their claim is based on something that DCFC were categorically cleared of.
So we have two claims. One moaning that Derby’s accounts were submitted within an EFL permitted timeframe. And one moaning that Derby sold their stadium despite a categorical not guilty verdict on that. These are holding the takeover up, meaning we cannot sign players, cannot give players new contracts (so are losing them for sweet FA) and are facing liquidation. Meanwhile the EFL sit there and say “yes but technically if they win they will be football creditors” which by law isn’t even true.
Good stuff.
-
nottingram got a reaction from Dordogne-Ram in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from angieram in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from Ramarena in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from vonwright in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from Carnero in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from DCFC Kicks in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from RoyMac5 in Festy Ebosele - Signed for Udinese
Off to Udinese on a free instead of Watford paying us compensation. Presumably end up back there within 6 months.
And we’re the problem?
-
nottingram got a reaction from admira in A new daily game. Name the ex-Ram from his playing career
Hossam Ghaly
-
nottingram reacted to May Contain Nuts in DCFC Answer Smash.
Helen Mirreniola Aluko
(Forgot what the clue was!)
-
nottingram got a reaction from whiteroseram in The Administration Thread
I can’t believe Quantuma would risk releasing the statement they did a couple of weeks ago, if Boro and Wycombe were not the stumbling block.
What would they have done if Boro and Wycombe had called their bluff and pulled their claims?
That said, it is concerning that Morris does seem to retain a degree of influence beyond confirmation he has agreed to sell the stadium for £20m. I find it quite amazing he expects even a penny after what he has done to the club but here we are.
-
-
nottingram got a reaction from Jubbs in A new daily game. Name the ex-Ram from his playing career
Gilles Sunu?
-
nottingram got a reaction from Rich84 in Tom Lawrence - Joined Rangers
I think we’d be lucky to get £500k
-
nottingram got a reaction from Chester40 in Tom Lawrence - Joined Rangers
I think we’d be lucky to get £500k
-