Shipley Ram

Although I don't have an issue with most of your work I do have an issue with the language you use. As I understand it the change in policy didn't reduce overall losses but moved them to a later accounting period. The way you worded your statement encouraged people to think the losses had been magically disaapeared rather than kicked down the road. This has provided ammunition to those who accuse Derby of systematically cheating, which deeply pi**es me off.
As far as I can see Mel saw a grey area he could take advantage of and recklessly steamed into it. The EFL just shugged their shoulders and ignored the matter, despite getting your letter informing of the impications, untill they were threatened with legal action.   Then then went back and charged us for the whole period, their cheer leaders from Middlesbrough and Wycome then weighed in with their systematically cheating alligations, which I think were against EFL rules and they should have been charged for.
We were found guilty of being in breach of FRS 102 due to professor Pops evidence which atated there was not a sufficient resale market for our system to work and that the amortorisation represented there value on the field and should be a straight line. This appear to be at odds with the policy of Stoke and others to reduce the values below a straight line and attribute the losses to Covid. Surley if you rely of professors Popes evidence that their values should be on a stright line reduction this policy is also against FRS 102? 
I'm happy to be corrected if I have misinterpreted anything.
 

Although I don't have an issue with most of your work I do have an issue with the language you use. As I understand it the change in policy didn't reduce overall losses but moved them to a later accounting period. The way you worded your statement encouraged people to think the losses had been magically disaapeared rather than kicked down the road. This has provided ammunition to those who accuse Derby of systematically cheating, which deeply pi**es me off.
As far as I can see Mel saw a grey area he could take advantage of and recklessly steamed into it. The EFL just shugged their shoulders and ignored the matter, despite getting your letter informing of the impications, untill they were threatened with legal action.   Then then went back and charged us for the whole period, their cheer leaders from Middlesbrough and Wycome then weighed in with their systematically cheating alligations, which I think were against EFL rules and they should have been charged for.
We were found guilty of being in breach of FRS 102 due to professor Pops evidence which atated there was not a sufficient resale market for our system to work and that the amortorisation represented there value on the field and should be a straight line. This appear to be at odds with the policy of Stoke and others to reduce the values below a straight line and attribute the losses to Covid. Surley if you rely of professors Popes evidence that their values should be on a stright line reduction this policy is also against FRS 102? 
I'm happy to be corrected if I have misinterpreted anything.
 

Although I don't have an issue with most of your work I do have an issue with the language you use. As I understand it the change in policy didn't reduce overall losses but moved them to a later accounting period. The way you worded your statement encouraged people to think the losses had been magically disaapeared rather than kicked down the road. This has provided ammunition to those who accuse Derby of systematically cheating, which deeply pi**es me off.
As far as I can see Mel saw a grey area he could take advantage of and recklessly steamed into it. The EFL just shugged their shoulders and ignored the matter, despite getting your letter informing of the impications, untill they were threatened with legal action.   Then then went back and charged us for the whole period, their cheer leaders from Middlesbrough and Wycome then weighed in with their systematically cheating alligations, which I think were against EFL rules and they should have been charged for.
We were found guilty of being in breach of FRS 102 due to professor Pops evidence which atated there was not a sufficient resale market for our system to work and that the amortorisation represented there value on the field and should be a straight line. This appear to be at odds with the policy of Stoke and others to reduce the values below a straight line and attribute the losses to Covid. Surley if you rely of professors Popes evidence that their values should be on a stright line reduction this policy is also against FRS 102? 
I'm happy to be corrected if I have misinterpreted anything.
 

You must have been close to me, I can see my mum in your picture but I'm not there yet.

I'm listerning to Benjamin Bloom and he kepps mentioning  the Leeds playoff game, that makes me smile.

I'm listerning to Benjamin Bloom and he kepps mentioning  the Leeds playoff game, that makes me smile.

Can we just clarify…
Whilst this is of course a joyous occasion, did he say anything about he’d rather it had been Preston?
?

Thank f**k for that, I never realised how much this was weighing on me until the weight was lifted.
 

Thank f**k for that, I never realised how much this was weighing on me until the weight was lifted.
 

Thank f**k for that, I never realised how much this was weighing on me until the weight was lifted.
 

Only 3 years ago
 

Only 3 years ago
 

Only 3 years ago
 

I'd like to, but I'm a Derby fan ?

I was looking for some music when reflect my febrile takeover mood and found some in Japan
 

When I saw the headline my first thought I don't want Tommy Docherty back.
 

I can't take this anymore i have to log off for a while.

I can't take this anymore i have to log off for a while.

What a game
 

Terry Curran, i can remember him shooting over the bar from two yards out.

Terry Curran, i can remember him shooting over the bar from two yards out.

On my way by train to see the Rams, first time this century. Treated myself to first class, £247 but I don't give a duck. Be in Geordie land in 5 minutes.

The latest HMHB offering is just immense, they really do get better and better as they go on. Not sure if this is, or isn't, my favourite track but have a listen for a BBG moment reference 
 

Going back a few years Bobby Campbell.