MadAmster Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 21 hours ago, Chris_Martin said: lets just say hypothetically, that it was the other way round and the boro player was running towards the ball and sonny bradley hit that pass too short trying to find vickers. Would you say thats a big mistake from bradley or would you say its a well created goal from boro ? Vickers did exactly that in one of his first, maybe his very first, games at pride Park last season. IMO, that, and Jacko's, were well taken goals rather than well created ones. Chris_Martin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Martin Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 30 minutes ago, MadAmster said: Vickers did exactly that in one of his first, maybe his very first, games at pride Park last season. IMO, that, and Jacko's, were well taken goals rather than well created ones. i'm not disputing if it was a well taken goal or not (i think it was) i'm saying that we were given the chance to score rather than created the chance to score. DCFC Kicks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenniumram Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 Who was it that said match day threads are only long when we lose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadAmster Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 (edited) 1 hour ago, Chris_Martin said: i'm not disputing if it was a well taken goal or not (i think it was) i'm saying that we were given the chance to score rather than created the chance to score. Which is what I said too. We agree. Although I did make a slight error in the post to which you replied. I meant Bradley, not Vickers, with his too short back pass last season.. Edited August 23 by MadAmster Chris_Martin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreveram Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 1 minute ago, MadAmster said: Which is what I said too. We agree. Comrade 86 and Chris_Martin 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mucker1884 Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 3 hours ago, Foreveram said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ram59 Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 6 hours ago, Chris_Martin said: i'm not disputing if it was a well taken goal or not (i think it was) i'm saying that we were given the chance to score rather than created the chance to score. I disagree, Jackson headed the ball clear from just inside our penalty area, then instead of just standing there, he chased his own clearance for over 15 yards. This resulted in the Boro player receiving the ball with Jackson hurtling towards him and only 2 yards away from him. He was forced into turning round and making a hurried back pass to his keeper which either was well short or the keeper wasn't in the pre arranged position, as it has previously been noted that their keeper was often in the centre circle when they were attacking. Either way, they were pressured into their actions by Jackson's great actions and anticipation. Virtually every goal conceded has an element of defenders giving the opposition the chance to score. Every chance that Boro had was a result of our defenders letting them have shots from distance, relying on Vickers to cope with the long shots. I don't remember them cutting us open once and if they did, you could argue that we gave them the chance because of poor marking or failing to follow the runner. Archied and GB SPORTS 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade 86 Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 29 minutes ago, ram59 said: I disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jourdan Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 Imagine having 30% possession at home and losing. And people want someone like Rohl over Warne… 😁 Rammy03, Carnero and MaltRam 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 2 hours ago, Jourdan said: Imagine having 30% possession at home and losing. And people want someone like Rohl over Warne… 😁 At this rate they're going to have to change his name to ROFL Jourdan, Comrade 86 and Premier ram 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 2 hours ago, Jourdan said: Imagine having 30% possession at home and losing. And people want someone like Rohl over Warne… 😁 There are quite a few who would want a dead cat instead of Warne. Jourdan, Tamworthram, Crewton and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now