Animal is a Ram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: If the EFL's 'rap sheet' tracker is correct, and we haven't submitted the accounts to them, then what were the 9 additional points deducted for? As I understand from the left image, we don't have to submit to HMRC, because administration, but still have to submit to EFL. Does this mean we still haven't submitted year ends 2019 and 2020? RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, Leeds Ram said: It might just be me but I listened to that and felt less reassured about the situation than I did before. I'm in about the same place - no more or less confident. Admittedly my confidence is pretty low at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipperram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 (edited) Before I sit down and construct a crappie worded email to Panarama to investigate how the EFL have managed to operate as a self licking lollipop for so long I thought I should garner some sensible topics from the Forum. Nothing rude just plain facts which could prove they are not fit for purpose. Edited January 28, 2022 by chipperram Missed out the EFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomAccessMemory Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 44 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: FYI, here's a little table of the teams who suffered P&S points deductions. Inconsistencies throughout. Birmingham the most harshly treated Delay in the season Sheff Weds got their penalty EFL's lateness in charging Derby for failed periods Just wondering a couple of things, would a failure in 14/15-16/17 definitely have been expected in 18/19 as opposed to 17/18, the season following the failure? Also, I didn’t think there was a 3 year period for 17/18-19/20? Because of Covid wasn’t it changed to 17/18-20/21 a 4 year period, with the average of years 19/20 and 20/21? RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 20 minutes ago, PistoldPete said: If everyone who used clever accounting to try and stay within FFP was actually guilty of breaching FFP then most clubs in the Championship will have broken FFP at one time. They’ve all done it. In fact Birmingham sold their ground too and that wasn’t challenged if you want to disallow that then they should have got done for more according to your warped logic. But these are completely different points to the ones you were making earlier. You are Rick Parry and I claim my £5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 So nothings changed again what are these meetings even doing apart from wasting time? Just the same story over and over Kathcairns, Derby4Me and Bald Eagle's Barmy Army 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bald Eagle's Barmy Army Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Topram said: So nothings changed again what are these meetings even doing apart from wasting time? Just the same story over and over Exactly - But you can't change something that was probably already decided months ago. I believe one of our punishments (without public knowledge) was to not let us do any business during this transfer window. RadioactiveWaste, Betty Swollocks, MackworthRamIsGod and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 9 minutes ago, RandomAccessMemory said: Just wondering a couple of things, would a failure in 14/15-16/17 definitely have been expected in 18/19 as opposed to 17/18, the season following the failure? Also, I didn’t think there was a 3 year period for 17/18-19/20? Because of Covid wasn’t it changed to 17/18-20/21 a 4 year period, with the average of years 19/20 and 20/21? Ugh! 2 more mistakes!! You're correct on both RandomAccessMemory 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, i-Ram said: But these are completely different points to the ones you were making earlier. You are Rick Parry and I claim my £5. No just saying that there is a difference from a club like QPR deliberately breaking FFP rules and hoping they will get away with it by getting promoted… which is the worst kind of breach. Whereas Doing what other clubs do to get around FFP legally but due to incompetence or whatever failing to do it is a lesser crime. that’s how the wendies penalty was fixed at only six points and if you think that is one eyed drivel we’ll take that up with Lord Dyson QC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 30 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: Solloway spoke on RD about an hour ago - about 11.10 here https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_derby Not much to say, really, that we didn't already know. She was bound by confidence, by the sounds, but it felt a very much politican answer. Complex situation, they talked about how to resolve the stadium/Boro/Wycombe/HMRC. There is another meeting next week. Confident that pressure is being applied to the right people. Also attending the meeting with Mel and Team Derby. A better link to this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 22 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: If the EFL's 'rap sheet' tracker is correct, and we haven't submitted the accounts to them, then what were the 9 additional points deducted for? As I understand from the left image, we don't have to submit to HMRC, because administration, but still have to submit to EFL. Does this mean we still haven't submitted year ends 2019 and 2020? 9 points was for failing the 3 P&S periods. 3 points were suspended conditional of meeting the requirements listed in the agreed decision doc (submitting accounts to EFL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomAccessMemory Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said: Ugh! 2 more mistakes!! You're correct on both Sorry ? I thought it was best to check as it means we wouldn’t have been punished in either of the years Boro and Wycombe are claiming they were disadvantaged for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 (edited) Beaten to the post again by @Animal is a Ram! #COYR Edited January 28, 2022 by RoyMac5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 31 minutes ago, Animal is a Ram said: Solloway spoke on RD about an hour ago - about 11.10 here https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_derby Not much to say, really, that we didn't already know. She was bound by confidence, by the sounds, but it felt a very much politican answer. Complex situation, they talked about how to resolve the stadium/Boro/Wycombe/HMRC. There is another meeting next week. Confident that pressure is being applied to the right people. Also attending the meeting with Mel and Team Derby. That didn’t sound good. What were the positive developments the EFL were referring to? Doesn’t sound positive at all. it would help if the MPs were allowed to speak about stuff. It all makes it even more worrying when we don’t know what is going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 17 minutes ago, chipperram said: Before I sit down and construct a crappie worded email to Panarama to investigate how the EFL have managed to operate as a self licking lollipop for so long I thought I should garner some sensible topics from the Forum. Nothing rude just plain facts which could prove they are not fit for purpose. If your looking for facts you might be on the wrong forum ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal is a Ram Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 Just now, Ghost of Clough said: 9 points was for failing the 3 P&S periods. 3 points were suspended conditional of meeting the requirements listed in the agreed decision doc (submitting accounts to EFL) Forgive stupid question, but... Does this mean P&S is not part of the accounts - i.e. submtting for P&S is a separate process to submitting full accounts? RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonwright Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Topram said: So nothings changed again what are these meetings even doing apart from wasting time? Just the same story over and over I suppose it's impossible to tell. They might have made a lot of progress or none. What I find incredibly frustrating is the way all parties - even the MPs - hide behind "commercial confidentiality" and "it's a complex situation" as an excuse to say nothing about anything of consequence. Is there a good reason, for example, the MPs couldn't give us a summary of what they think the main problems are, and how they think they should be resolved? What they think of the Boro and Wycombe claims, and whether they are a major stumbling block? Whether they think the EFL should say whether Boro and Wycombe are football creditors? And so on. It's ridiculous how little we actually know about what's happening, what the disagreements are, and how our political representatives - having heard from both sides - think they should be resolved. "It's complex" - yeah, we know, that's why we need you to explain it to us, having heard from both sides. "Commercially confidential" - some bits, but not necessarily the bits we are interested in. And if the EFL and/or administrators are insisting you say nothing about anything as a condition of having meetings, let's hear that. And let's hear you complaining about it. Edited January 28, 2022 by vonwright Kathcairns 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 Just now, RandomAccessMemory said: Sorry ? I thought it was best to check as it means we wouldn’t have been punished in either of the years Boro and Wycombe are claiming they were disadvantaged for. No worries. If you may recall, Gibson's first claim was because Derby should have been penalised in 18/19 given the EFl charged us with failing the 15/16-17/18 period. His sole argument was relating to the stadium sale. Upon restating the amortisation figures, the period of overspend shifted and so too did the year we should have been penalised. However, Gibson has since decided it's the amortisation policy which is the problem, and it's not the season we should have been punished, but one of the seasons which falls inside a rolling 3 year period. RandomAccessMemory 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Animal is a Ram said: Forgive stupid question, but... Does this mean P&S is not part of the accounts - i.e. submtting for P&S is a separate process to submitting full accounts? Not silly at all. They're separate documents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted January 28, 2022 Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 minute ago, vonwright said: I suppose it's impossible to tell. They might have made a lot of progress or none. What I find incredibly frustrating is the way all parties - even the MPs - hide behind "commercial confidentiality" as an excuse to say nothing about anything of consequence. Is there a good reason, for example, the MPs couldn't give us a summary of what they think the main problems are, and how they think they should be resolved? What they think of the Boro and Wycombe claims, and whether they are a major stumbling block? Whether they think the EFL should say whether Boro and Wycombe are football creditors? And so on. It's ridiculous how little we actually know about what's happening, what the disagreements are, and how our political representatives - having heard from both sides - think they should be resolved. The very least I would expect is to signal what exactly is being done… other than just talking… what if any progress has been made? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now