Bianoic Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 11 minutes ago, gfs1ram said: Spot on Bianoic For example Companies could defer VAT payments from last year until April 2021. Which I think you will find a lot of Clubs did. It looks as though we are the only Club however not to have paid it up to date in April? I believe interest of 5% is charged by HMRC ( could be wrong) if so that could be a lot cheaper than borrowing from our other sources! It doesn't help our embargo though!! And you are spot on too gfs ! Very interesting comment about borrowing. It genuinely would not surprise me in the slightest if Mel/Stephen were actually ‘playing’ the current circumstances with HMRC to generate funding for use in other areas of the club ! Given how hardball Mel is being about everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 28 minutes ago, Bianoic said: Sorry to drone on about this and bore people to death but both of your statements above are factually completely incorrect, from my own personal knowledge of working today with all sorts of businesses and organisations, from the very large to very small. As you say, though, GE, interesting to try to read between the lines but lets hope the actual facts come out soon. I worked for HMRC for 14 years so I'm going on that, including 5 years with the official receiver and courts. Maybe things have changed since 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bianoic Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 1 hour ago, 86 Hair Islands said: Well let's wait and see, eh? Is this one of those passive aggressive responses that @i-Ramwas warning about a little while ago ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade 86 Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 22 minutes ago, Bianoic said: Is this one of those passive aggressive responses that @i-Ramwas warning about a little while ago ???? No idea what you're on about mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Gee SCREAMER !! said: I worked for HMRC for 14 years so I'm going on that, including 5 years with the official receiver and courts. Maybe things have changed since 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee SCREAMER !! Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 31 minutes ago, hintonsboots said: ?. Honestly some of the nicest people I worked with. Certainly compared to some of the deep diving clusters I've had to work alongside in middle management positions since. Stepped away from that before I killed someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 I think this might mean some outstanding accounts have been filed with Companies House? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Half Fan Half Biscuit Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 18 minutes ago, angieram said: I think this might mean some outstanding accounts have been filed with Companies House? Outstanding confirmation statements were filed yesterday. It could be that directors have an agreement with Co House that they can’t file accounts till dispute with EFL is sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestLondonRam Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 Normally A Compulsory Strike off is for a Unfilled accounts and un-used companies by Companies house. This is not a Voluntary Strike off. This isn't Mel retiring it is companies house which has arranged this instead of a Liquidation as the Company in un-used or refused to submit accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 49 minutes ago, WestLondonRam said: Normally A Compulsory Strike off is for a Unfilled accounts and un-used companies by Companies house. This is not a Voluntary Strike off. This isn't Mel retiring it is companies house which has arranged this instead of a Liquidation as the Company in un-used or refused to submit accounts. I keep reading this and I still don’t know what this means ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 14 minutes ago, Sparkle said: I keep reading this and I still don’t know what this means ? Lol. I read it and didn't care what it meant! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Sparkle said: I keep reading this and I still don’t know what this means ? 1 hour ago, RoyMac5 said: Lol. I read it and didn't care what it meant! ? I read it on Twitter. Usual companies house post from Andy with no context or explanation. I too didn't know what it meant, then I too decided I didn't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crewton Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 4 hours ago, angieram said: I think this might mean some outstanding accounts have been filed with Companies House? No, the filings records show that the late annual Confirmation Statements for both companies have now been filed. The Registrar (I'm assuming, because they can do it if they think the companies aren't trading any more) issued the CSO notice which the companies have finally responded to. Once the Statements are filed, the CSO notice is satisfied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestLondonRam Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 2 hours ago, Sparkle said: I keep reading this and I still don’t know what this means ? Basically, Companies house have Forced the Strike off (Removal as a limited company) as it's compulsory. If it is a Voluntary Strike off (Again Removal of a limited company) it means Mel has removed it as he is retiring from the company or Liquidating the company as it is no longer needed. So either he has refused to Submit accounts for the 2 companies or the companies have not been used for trading since the last set of submitted accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestLondonRam Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 correct refused to issue accounts or not used for trading and is now satisfied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.