The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 3 hours ago, EnigmaRam said: Said that about 20 pages ago What is everyone waffling on about then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milbs Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 2 hours ago, Ninos said: You're wrong. Fulham take up the option to buy. He's their player - to rot in their reserves, if he refuses to play. He won't even refuse to play especially if they are in the premier league or he's given a contract matching ours. Fulham give us the the remaining money come season end, he's theirs full stop. And they've shown us they'll play hardball if they have to. you need to pay attention. Jesus Christ almighty..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve How Hard? Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 23 minutes ago, The Scarlet Pimpernel said: What is everyone waffling on about then? I think certain posters are struggling coming to terms with the possibility of the return of a player described by Fulhams manager as "Derby Countys best striker." Maybe they'll return to planet earth once CM is back where he rightfully belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaRam Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 31 minutes ago, The Scarlet Pimpernel said: What is everyone waffling on about then? We are trying to educate a WUM. It's tough going but we all love a challenge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 8 minutes ago, EnigmaRam said: We are trying to educate a WUM. It's tough going but we all love a challenge I think the problem lies within your answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andicis Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 20 minutes ago, EnigmaRam said: We are trying to educate a WUM. It's tough going but we all love a challenge Thinking about it, I don't know why I bothered trying. They're clearing wumming, but yet they're so good at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsnip Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 If Fulham intend to keep Chris Martin then they absolutely can. They can force him to sign at the end of the season and force him to play in either their first team or their reserves - whichever they choose. They are also entitled to make his family move to fulham and make his children leave their school and be educated in a place of their choosing. Basically Chris Martin signed away his entire freedom the moment he travelled down the m1. If by any chance he tries to renege on his agreement with Fulham, they will put him in a labour camp and he'll never see light of day again. No wait... that's North Korea! Yeah he'll be fine - I'm pretty sure he can say no here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 22 minutes ago, kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong said: That's no fun, what else are we going to do until Chrissy comes back?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade 86 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 2 hours ago, David said: For £50 I will be willing to change any members username to number 1 fan of any player you choose. ClodDavis#1Fan it is then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 can we have a whip round to get @Ninos to be "Chris Martin's #1 fan"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsnip Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Gary Rowett here explaining a little bit about how these 'option to buy' clauses work. I think this also answers the ongoing Chris Martin question... "If Andreas Weimann doesn't want to sign for Wolves at the end of it, then he will come back. "If he wants to sign for Wolves at the end of it, and Wolves want him then that will happen naturally because that's what an option is." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Flat earth society on this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Ram Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 5 hours ago, CumbrianRam said: Flat earth society on this thread. It's a Chris Martin thread.. Nothing is flat. Fat earth society surely. Lazy posting.. Oh no lazy is Chris again, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 6 hours ago, Ninos said: I pay attn to what's going on at Fulham too big boy. GR is saying all the right things but Martin is out of his control. It would be unprofessional to treat him as a Fulham player yet Going to reply to you in this thread as @sage's thread wasn't set up for this discussion. Whilst it is out of Gary's control as to whether or not Martin can come back, he still has a say whether or not Martin will come back. And what are Fulham saying? They haven't released any official statement. They haven't spoken to any press. All you have got is a podcast where you claim backs you up, even though another poster says it doesn't. As @David said, how far into the podcast is it, don't fancy sitting through an hours worth of Fulham talk. At the minute you sound like that crazy chick that your mrs has that wants you to break up over every little disagreement, and is constantly talking **** in the vain hope it will stick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninos Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 44 minutes ago, rynny said: Going to reply to you in this thread as @sage's thread wasn't set up for this discussion. Whilst it is out of Gary's control as to whether or not Martin can come back, he still has a say whether or not Martin will come back. And what are Fulham saying? They haven't released any official statement. They haven't spoken to any press. All you have got is a podcast where you claim backs you up, even though another poster says it doesn't. As @David said, how far into the podcast is it, don't fancy sitting through an hours worth of Fulham talk. At the minute you sound like that crazy chick that your mrs has that wants you to break up over every little disagreement, and is constantly talking **** in the vain hope it will stick. with respect, your reply is poor, and not worthy of much of a response. you're just trying to get a personal dig in. Reference your last sentence. I was asked for a link i sent the link. You go find where what i said was inconsistent with what was said by Tony Khan when asked about the Martin situation. Then report back when you have a substantive response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Quote I can't be bothered to listen to it, but apparently there's talk of legal action against Derby in an interview with Fulham's Tony Khan! "Listening to the interview with Tony Khan it seems that Martin can´t be held responsible for the situation. Khan mentioned illegal activities that did not involve Fulham nor Martin. There is some form of litigation directed towards McClaren & Derby." http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cottagetalk/2017/03/04/cottage-talk-exclusive-interview-with-tony-khan On 05/03/2017 at 21:39, reveldevil said: From 22.50 in. Fulham have no problem with Chris Martin's conduct, neither does their manager, but there is ongoing litigation from Fulham alleging illegal activity involving a 3rd party. They won't forget the immoral way they were treated, and neither will the Khan family! This is the (old) interview @Ninos is raking up. There's nothing new in it bar the litigation bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 48 minutes ago, Ninos said: with respect, your reply is poor, and not worthy of much of a response. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 13 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: This is the (old) interview @Ninos is raking up. There's nothing new in it bar the litigation bit! I didn't see that @reveldevil had said the where it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, rynny said: I didn't see that @reveldevil had said the where it is. I'm assuming that only part of the interview mentioned CM and that started at 22:50 in but I admit I've not listened. The bit about the litigation was the thing at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.