Jump to content

Alan Nixon transfer debacle 16/17


North_Stand_Ram

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
15 hours ago, Woodley Ram said:

Having a go? What, trying to buy everyone, go big, piss people off??????????

The 'buy everyone, go big' stuff is solely down to people like Nixon - and the prats who hang on his every word. It's like religion - the opiate of the masses, and just like religion, it's all based on illusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

Nixon sayin we are in talks with wigan for Hanson on loan too but we want Wildschut so wont be easy

They can't have him due some reason (left back situation) oh and he was injured yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, whiteroseram said:

He's blocked me for asking what (if anything) was in the paper today!

Might be because I said none of us know because we all have to much self respect to buy that rag...on reflection I could have asked nicer. 

You said what we were all thinking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, whiteroseram said:

He's blocked me for asking what (if anything) was in the paper today!

Might be because I said none of us know because we all have to much self respect to buy that rag...on reflection I could have asked nicer. 

This really deserves a 'like' but having gone a bit 'like' happy yesterday, I've still none to use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCFC1388 said:

Nixon sayin we are in talks with wigan for Hanson on loan too but we want Wildschut so wont be easy

A month ago that might have been a goer, but I guess that Nixon has not updated his magic 8-ball. Hanson is

a) needed to fill in at full back

b) injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this move makes sense

Keogh can play right back if baird cant

Shackell can play left back if needed, isnt anya back soon (possibly for leeds)?

Hanson is no left back as proven yesterday - we would need to loan a left back rather than play hanson

To be fair i bet russell could probably play left back in an emergency 

 

Wildschut would be a quality signing, his lack of celebration after his goal yesterday suggests to me that he is leaving Wigan to sign somewhere in this window .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, eddie said:

A month ago that might have been a goer, but I guess that Nixon has not updated his magic 8-ball. Hanson is

a) needed to fill in at full back

b) injured.

To be fair Mc has said that Anya could be back for Leeds and Olsson for Reading

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, thekingofbuxton said:

I think this move makes sense

Keogh can play right back if baird cant

Shackell can play left back if needed, isnt anya back soon (possibly for leeds)?

Hanson is no left back as proven yesterday - we would need to loan a left back rather than play hanson

To be fair i bet russell could probably play left back in an emergency 

 

Wildschut would be a quality signing, his lack of celebration after his goal yesterday suggests to me that he is leaving Wigan to sign somewhere in this window .

It was only forest so it didn't count! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thekingofbuxton said:

I think this move makes sense

Keogh can play right back if baird cant

Shackell can play left back if needed, isnt anya back soon (possibly for leeds)?

Hanson is no left back as proven yesterday - we would need to loan a left back rather than play hanson

To be fair i bet russell could probably play left back in an emergency 

 

Wildschut would be a quality signing, his lack of celebration after his goal yesterday suggests to me that he is leaving Wigan to sign somewhere in this window .

If when he scored there was a lack of celebration against Florest, then that to me would suggest he is going to sign for The Gumps then wouldn't it?? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nixon saying we are still in for a wide man, says Sako is available for 4m but his wages demands (40k+) are the stubbling block and Wildschut price is too high for us.

Says Sako wage demands could change at the end of the transfer window

He has been bang on with Nugent and De Sart recently as well as our interest in Sako

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

Nixon saying we are still in for a wide man, says Sako is available for 4m but his wages demands (40k+) are the stubbling block and Wildschut price is too high for us.

Says Sako wage demands could change at the end of the transfer window

He has been bang on with Nugent and De Sart recently as well as our interest in Sako

If he could shave a bit off that we might be in business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

Nixon saying we are still in for a wide man, says Sako is available for 4m but his wages demands (40k+) are the stubbling block and Wildschut price is too high for us.

Says Sako wage demands could change at the end of the transfer window

He has been bang on with Nugent and De Sart recently as well as our interest in Sako

 

16 minutes ago, The 1884 Group said:

If he could shave a bit off that we might be in business.

Could see him negotiating a lower wage but having big wage increase with a promotion clause

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...