Mick Brolly

17 minutes ago, valakari said:

Collins touched the ball approx 7 times in the whole game. His first touch was in the 34th minute

So what 

21 minutes ago, Ramarena said:

1Wildsmith- 6.5

23Ward- 6.5

7 Barkhuizen- 6.5

35Nelson- 8

6Cashin- 7

3Forsyth- 6.5

4Hourihane- 6.5

22Fornah- 6

2Wilson- 7

17Sibley- 7

5Bradley- 6

8Bird- 7

11Méndez-Laing- 8

39Brown- 6

9Collins- 4

19John-Jules- 7

TV

Collins missed a sitter 4 - jj misses a sitter 7

1 minute ago, Topram said:

Dry bar inside?

No all good 

Security on the turnstiles very strict even patting down kids which I  think is totally out of order

10 minutes ago, Caerphilly Ram said:

He played the ball out of defence that led to the opening goal….I think. Did other bits too, I thought he played his part as did the rest

Yeah to be fair he did ok in parts 

2 minutes ago, Caerphilly Ram said:

🤣

Probably the most involved sibbo was all game 

47 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

Not sure if its been mentioned in the thread but i found it interesting that only 2 of the 11 that started were Warne signings (Nelson & Nyambe) yet all 7 subs were his signings. 

You get applause from Roy mac for that because weather you meant it or not he can use it in his anti Warne campaign 

Just witnessed one of the all time worst refereeing decisions 

Rest in peace B4 

Just now, DavesaRam said:

A hat trick for the donkey! Well done Collo!

Obviously not that much of a donkey then 

13 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said:

VAR feast at Spurs vs Chelsea.

I wonder why Sterling wasn’t penalised for a blatant dive before the penalty was awarded? 

And another dive by Sterling 

2 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said:

Because he couldn't find a nipple in a skip full of t!ts.

Try answering with something sensible 

1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said:

There's positive and there's inventive. We didn't score either of our goals from a cross. But we kept trying. There is that positive enough for you?

From you it is 

5 minutes ago, rammieib said:

Today more than any other game was our inability to finish. Some of the attempts were pathetic.

This falls on PW as he failed to get a replacement striker in. That was the same front six, with Washington replacing Didzy - so not one single person can argue we strengthened.

Thats on PW as he didn’t have the ability or pull to get anyone in.

Why does it all fall on Warne 

2 minutes ago, Jram said:

They thoroughly outclassed Crewe today. They’re not quite creating the number of clear cut chances required to win consistently but I think that will come. 
 

Up the Rams.

And you get the usual laughing emoji from Roy mac because you dared to post something positive 

3 minutes ago, Ghost of Clough said:

Imagine having Washington and Bird in the middle of the box and thinking the best way to score is by putting high crosses in

Yeah that was strange and annoying 

12 minutes ago, Shuff264 said:

Couple flukey goals papers over the cracks of another poor performance.

Not sure how you justify the tactic of crossing the ball at every opportunity versus a back 3 and with Connor Washington up front on his own.

Warne then backed this up with his usual trick of waiting too long to make subs and switching between a back 3 and 4 at every available opportunity.

Performance wasn't poor imo and don't see how our 2nd was a fluke but maybe that's what some like to think to fit their agendas 

1 minute ago, Srg said:

So when you’ve got a good finisher on the bench who’s pretty good at having a go from outside the box, not bringing him on til really late makes sense does it? Or when you’re completely camped on top of them, but have no invention in the middle, you persist with Korey Smith, is that good management too?

Don't think the manager got much wrong today on the other hand the players decision making with the final ball wasn't the best 

1 hour ago, WystonRam said:

Surely after this he cannot survive ?

After a 2-2 draw?

23 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said:

More luck than judgement.

Bet your gutted 😄

4 minutes ago, Srg said:

Just more bafflement from Warne is the frustration more than the result. 

When things aren’t working, he waits until 70 minutes to do anything. Then seemingly makes subs which don’t attempt to fix the problems there are

The only thing not working today was our ability to put it in the net blaming Warne absolutely baffles me

56 minutes ago, jimtastic56 said:

Cobblers beaten at home by a 4th tier team  in the cup , that’s how bad they are . Warne loves hammering a tiddler , so should be no problems tommorow

How about trying to give derby a bit of credit for a decent performance 

2 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said:

Although I'm not impressed that it happened at Clowes' house

Why

36 minutes ago, IlsonDerby said:

The point was more he isn’t some absolute chancer he’s a serious business man. He’ll know things we don’t because he’s in different circles to us. It’s why most clubs seem to roughly know the ball park budgets for other teams. That’s why I believe him when he says our budget is good. 
 

The other part about the ‘proof’ is more for mick who is seemingly questioning the size of our  budget. 
 

 

Sorry for questioning something 

9 hours ago, JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta said:

If you had to guess where do you reckon we sit in terms of budget relative to the rest of the division?

7th