Jump to content

Mick Brolly

Member
  • Posts

    3,930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mick Brolly

  1. 1 minute ago, Millenniumram said:

    I think the key is, what would it take to change David Clowes mind?

    Im still told he’s staunchly in support of Warne, despite growing voices from others involved at the club wanting him gone. If he’s really intent on leaving him in charge for the full 4 years (which is what I’m told is his intention, irrespective of what happens), then does he not fear about attendances dropping, and a toxic atmosphere developing. We’ve already seen that today, with the booing and abuse after the match.

     

    Who told you this then?

  2. 5 minutes ago, Marriot Ram99 said:

    He's probably on about par if we win on Saturday, with our team in this division and the budget top 4 should be a minimum really this season.  Wouldn't surprise me if we go up but tbh he isn't the man for Derby long term imo. Long term doesn't matter this year as long as we go up but due to play style and other factors if we are not top 6 will be alot of people wanting him out come new year.

     

    4 minutes ago, Tombo said:

    He's just said on the radio two absolutely astounding things.

     

    "We only have two or three players at the club with electric pace [...] who can play counter attacking football"

     

    "If we played like that at Pride Park we'd get booed off at half time"

     

    Why does he have to ruin every good moment he manages to create?

    The players get clapped off the pitch at full time every single game at Pride Park. Half time, there would not have been booing if we had played that first half where we kept it tight and then created some good chances.

    Why does he treat the fans of this club with such utter disdain and contempt every time he speaks?

    Can't you just enjoy the win instead of bitching about the manager 

  3. 1 minute ago, Tombo said:

    He's just said on the radio two absolutely astounding things.

     

    "We only have two or three players at the club with electric pace [...] who can play counter attacking football"

     

    "If we played like that at Pride Park we'd get booed off at half time"

     

    Why does he have to ruin every good moment he manages to create?

    The players get clapped off the pitch at full time every single game at Pride Park. Half time, there would not have been booing if we had played that first half where we kept it tight and then created some good chances.

    Why does he treat the fans of this club with such utter disdain and contempt every time he speaks?

    Right though isn't he 

  4. 3 hours ago, RoyMac5 said:

    I agree. Lincoln still passed the ball more freely and better than we did until the final third. It was so obvious our only tactic, until Sibs disobeyed and went through the middle, was play the ball out wide to the fullbacks. Cashin to Wilson was on repeat and Lincoln let them. Wilson looks nothing like a fullback but slightly like a winger, and managed some half decent possession. The midfield was lightweight as a feather and up front was invisible. How far Warne has dropped us if some think this was a good display.

    But you can only beat the opposition in front of you. So it looked like we ripped Lincoln reserves another hole. 😄

    You almost posted something positive Bet that hurt 😆

  5. 7 hours ago, Jubbs said:

    Why do I? 

    As @AndyinLiverpool says. The system is weighed so heavily against the victim. If you don't immediately/next morning get a kit or go to the police, you pretty much have a near zero chance. 

    So you're saying these people accusing RB have little chance of a conviction then 😡

  6. 7 hours ago, AndyinLiverpool said:

    Because the victim has to go through a degrading process in the investigation and court. They get treated as the perpetrator and assumptions about their character are made based on the way they dress, their history and lifestyle.

    That's not good, thanks for the reply but i was asking the poster why the people he knew didn't get justice 

  7. 1 hour ago, Jubbs said:

    I'm sorry but some of the posts in here have me raging. 

    It's always instantly defending the accused rather than sympathising with the victim, or in this case, victims.

    This isn't just a small accusation that has no evidence, this has been on the cards for years and the victims are finally ready to come out. That's okay and if you actually listened or read any of the news articles, any previous attempts to come out, the victims have been intimidated by Brand's lawyers. There's no way C4 or The Times would have been able to publish anything without evidence.

    For the past few years Brand has been placing himself on the right side of the political spectrum and has been going with this "anti mainstream media" view because he knows this is his best chance of getting some defenders from the public. When the people speaking out in your favour are Elon Musk, Andrew Tate, Carlson Tucker and Katie Hopkins, I can make my own conclusions solely based off that.  

    Look at this from earlier on this year:

    image.png.947f2acd841975e61c4400157eda93e1.png

    This is after a 3 year+ investigation with medical records and text conversations etc, this isn't just a small accusation.

    Here are links for anyone suffering or has suffered.

    https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/sexual-health/help-after-rape-and-sexual-assault/
    https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-help/want-to-talk/
    https://safeline.org.uk/

    Who on here has defended him?

×
×
  • Create New...