Jump to content

DavesaRam

Member
  • Posts

    3,481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Cheers
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Ellafella in Bolton Wanderers (H) Sat 21st Jan   
    So what you are saying is "We always get crap refs"?
  2. Clap
    DavesaRam got a reaction from SaffyRam in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    Curiously the rule we “broke” all thise years ago wasn’t in the EFL rule book until February last year! ?
  3. Like
    DavesaRam reacted to B4ev6is in I wander with shiffield going embargo   
    Well I got confused on this one sorry but other thread I just think efl still got it in for us.
  4. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to WystonRam in Bolton Wanderers (H) Sat 21st Jan   
    Weather ruled tbh ! Awful conditions to play in.
  5. Like
    DavesaRam reacted to Warren Blufitt in Bolton Wanderers (H) Sat 21st Jan   
    Hi guys another Wanderer here and equally perplexed why most posts are about the crowd not the game? Brilliant support you’ve had this season after all that’s gone on so well done on that. Should be a cracking game with both sides going for a win and both in good form. Obviously we’re suffering from a few injuries and departures, especially Afolyan going and Bod out for the season but we should still have more than enough to compete. It goes without saying that this game should be in a higher division than this so let’s hope we can both get there soon. A draw wouldn’t be bad for either but I think we need the win more than you do. Whatever happens I think we’ll both make the top six so we may have to meet again this season yet? Let’s just hope it’s a good game and not spoiled by poor refereeing.
  6. Like
    DavesaRam reacted to gfs1ram in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    That's why I wish Mel had kept funding the Club. I really would have liked to see him take the EFL to court over the points deductions and Gibson to court over the extortion. 
  7. Like
    DavesaRam got a reaction from uttoxram75 in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    Curiously the rule we “broke” all thise years ago wasn’t in the EFL rule book until February last year! ?
  8. Like
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Steve How Hard? in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    Curiously the rule we “broke” all thise years ago wasn’t in the EFL rule book until February last year! ?
  9. Clap
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Betty Swollocks in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    Curiously the rule we “broke” all thise years ago wasn’t in the EFL rule book until February last year! ?
  10. Like
    DavesaRam reacted to Gee SCREAMER !! in Stephen Pearce...didn't get out of our club   
    Absolute rubbish.
     
     
    It was 5 months after that.  Even worse
  11. Clap
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Kathcairns in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    Yes it was rather full. And a highlight was seeing Les Green save at point blank range from Greavsie! And he held on to the ball as well. No poncy palming it past the post!
  12. Clap
    DavesaRam got a reaction from RoyMac5 in The Bird enigma   
    Something that has come to light through the player interviews is that Paul has given them freedom to play their natural game - “just play football” is the phrase that comes to mind. So when a player receives the ball he no longer has to think back to what Rosenior’s “on the road to nowhere” manual says, they just do what comes naturally. Such as giving it a right belting from 35 yards! 
  13. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to ilkleyram in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    I thought bielik had decided to stay at Brum. 
  14. Haha
    DavesaRam reacted to sage in The Bird enigma   
    Excellent, insightful post.
    Have you been hacked?
    ?
  15. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to RoyMac5 in The Bird enigma   
    The thing is you can't ask youngsters to do more with their bodies than they are physically ready for. It's quite obvious that Bird, Sibley and Knight have all 'grown up' and are better equipped to learn how to use their bodies. You can't rush that. So you can't ask Dobbin to put himself about like Colin or Chrissy used to, he's not physically ready.
  16. Clap
    DavesaRam got a reaction from SKRam in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    Yes it was rather full. And a highlight was seeing Les Green save at point blank range from Greavsie! And he held on to the ball as well. No poncy palming it past the post!
  17. Cheers
    DavesaRam got a reaction from SKRam in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    I was sure either way about bringing Warne in, but had at least some hopes, because until then we could put together some lovely looking moves, but they tended to produce nothing. I could see that we could end up being the most attractive playing relegated side in League 1, even though Rosenior had got us to 7th place. But by then, the opposition had got us sussed, and our single dimension couldn't do anything about the sussing.
    I didn't like the kick and rush approach, and we were not easy on the eye in any way, shape or form. But at least whenever we got the ball, it seemed that something would happen. It was the speed of getting the ball forwards, as far as I am concerned. And Paul Warne did stubbornly stick with his 3 at the back and hoof it methodology. A bit like when Ray Wilkins got suspended in the whatever years World Cup it was, and suddenly England stared playing better, Warned was forced to go 4 at the back, and suddenly things started to look batter. And thankfully he is man enough to go with what was working, regardless of how he personally wanted to take us.
    There are two issues which have been key to our coming to life. The first one is the fitness issue - he has got the players leaving everything on the pitch, to the point of having to crawl up before the full 90 is up in some cases. It is paying dividends, and we are now fitter and outlasting the opposition consistently, with the benefit that we now have players operating within their limits instead of being at their limits for most of the match. And secondly he has spotted potential in players whose playing position seemed set in stone. The transformation of Fozzy isn't because he should always been a centre half, but that Paul has put him there, and had to because of circumstance, but has clearly worked with him and developed him in his new role. Even for an old warhorse, there is always something to be learned! And young Sibbers! It has helped that Paul has given the lad a chance, but has also seen his potential for the new role - one which I reckon none of us could seeing as applying to Louie. And again, the reward are there to be seen. The only question is "What has he been doing with the rest of the squad that we haven't noticed yet?
    and despite Paul not signing anyone yet, and most of us thinking we needed quite a number of new faces, I wouldn't mind  if all we sign is someone who knows where the onion bag is. someone in this thread said if we had got such a player on Saturday we would have scored 8!
    The 5 - 0 whooping of Spurs for may first match back in 1973, the second play-off semi against Brighton (and that whole Steve Mac 1 era are high spots for me out of the last almost 50 years, but I am sure that we are in a season which will join those permanent high spot memories! Woo Hoo!
  18. Haha
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Reggie Greenwood in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    What must I have been on to loose 4 years of my life like that?
  19. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to uttoxram75 in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    There must be a Bobby Davison out there somewhere. Thats all we need to get out of this division, one out and out instinctive goal poacher and we'd get promoted either through the play offs or even autos.
    Didzy scores some crackers and others like Barks, Mendez-Laing, Collins and Houriane contribute but how many times do we see the ball flash across the box without someone gambling on making a run rather than waiting for the perfect cross.
  20. Like
    DavesaRam got a reaction from jono in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    I was sure either way about bringing Warne in, but had at least some hopes, because until then we could put together some lovely looking moves, but they tended to produce nothing. I could see that we could end up being the most attractive playing relegated side in League 1, even though Rosenior had got us to 7th place. But by then, the opposition had got us sussed, and our single dimension couldn't do anything about the sussing.
    I didn't like the kick and rush approach, and we were not easy on the eye in any way, shape or form. But at least whenever we got the ball, it seemed that something would happen. It was the speed of getting the ball forwards, as far as I am concerned. And Paul Warne did stubbornly stick with his 3 at the back and hoof it methodology. A bit like when Ray Wilkins got suspended in the whatever years World Cup it was, and suddenly England stared playing better, Warned was forced to go 4 at the back, and suddenly things started to look batter. And thankfully he is man enough to go with what was working, regardless of how he personally wanted to take us.
    There are two issues which have been key to our coming to life. The first one is the fitness issue - he has got the players leaving everything on the pitch, to the point of having to crawl up before the full 90 is up in some cases. It is paying dividends, and we are now fitter and outlasting the opposition consistently, with the benefit that we now have players operating within their limits instead of being at their limits for most of the match. And secondly he has spotted potential in players whose playing position seemed set in stone. The transformation of Fozzy isn't because he should always been a centre half, but that Paul has put him there, and had to because of circumstance, but has clearly worked with him and developed him in his new role. Even for an old warhorse, there is always something to be learned! And young Sibbers! It has helped that Paul has given the lad a chance, but has also seen his potential for the new role - one which I reckon none of us could seeing as applying to Louie. And again, the reward are there to be seen. The only question is "What has he been doing with the rest of the squad that we haven't noticed yet?
    and despite Paul not signing anyone yet, and most of us thinking we needed quite a number of new faces, I wouldn't mind  if all we sign is someone who knows where the onion bag is. someone in this thread said if we had got such a player on Saturday we would have scored 8!
    The 5 - 0 whooping of Spurs for may first match back in 1973, the second play-off semi against Brighton (and that whole Steve Mac 1 era are high spots for me out of the last almost 50 years, but I am sure that we are in a season which will join those permanent high spot memories! Woo Hoo!
  21. Like
    DavesaRam got a reaction from Dordogne-Ram in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    I was sure either way about bringing Warne in, but had at least some hopes, because until then we could put together some lovely looking moves, but they tended to produce nothing. I could see that we could end up being the most attractive playing relegated side in League 1, even though Rosenior had got us to 7th place. But by then, the opposition had got us sussed, and our single dimension couldn't do anything about the sussing.
    I didn't like the kick and rush approach, and we were not easy on the eye in any way, shape or form. But at least whenever we got the ball, it seemed that something would happen. It was the speed of getting the ball forwards, as far as I am concerned. And Paul Warne did stubbornly stick with his 3 at the back and hoof it methodology. A bit like when Ray Wilkins got suspended in the whatever years World Cup it was, and suddenly England stared playing better, Warned was forced to go 4 at the back, and suddenly things started to look batter. And thankfully he is man enough to go with what was working, regardless of how he personally wanted to take us.
    There are two issues which have been key to our coming to life. The first one is the fitness issue - he has got the players leaving everything on the pitch, to the point of having to crawl up before the full 90 is up in some cases. It is paying dividends, and we are now fitter and outlasting the opposition consistently, with the benefit that we now have players operating within their limits instead of being at their limits for most of the match. And secondly he has spotted potential in players whose playing position seemed set in stone. The transformation of Fozzy isn't because he should always been a centre half, but that Paul has put him there, and had to because of circumstance, but has clearly worked with him and developed him in his new role. Even for an old warhorse, there is always something to be learned! And young Sibbers! It has helped that Paul has given the lad a chance, but has also seen his potential for the new role - one which I reckon none of us could seeing as applying to Louie. And again, the reward are there to be seen. The only question is "What has he been doing with the rest of the squad that we haven't noticed yet?
    and despite Paul not signing anyone yet, and most of us thinking we needed quite a number of new faces, I wouldn't mind  if all we sign is someone who knows where the onion bag is. someone in this thread said if we had got such a player on Saturday we would have scored 8!
    The 5 - 0 whooping of Spurs for may first match back in 1973, the second play-off semi against Brighton (and that whole Steve Mac 1 era are high spots for me out of the last almost 50 years, but I am sure that we are in a season which will join those permanent high spot memories! Woo Hoo!
  22. COYR
    DavesaRam got a reaction from SKRam in Cheltenham Town (A) Sat 14th Jan   
    In the glorious Brian Clough era I would go home after watching a match without singling anybody out for playing badly - we just didn't do it. The worse was criticising John McGovern for the un-human way he ran about the pitch, and Alan Hinton for the aggressive, physical way he would challenge for the bal ..................... oh wait. He was called "Gladys" for a reason.
    I have fast got to the same position with this squad - they are all heroes, with each one contributing to the best of their ability. I was even glad that Colin Hourihane was in the team today, even though for a number of games he had largely been a waste of space. And it was actually a great header for the first goal!
    We were so on top for much of the game, and should have scored 6 or 7, given the great opportunities we kept carving out for ourselves, but the substitutions changed everything. I know Collins seems to have trouble focussing on a barn door let alone a set of goalposts at the moment, but we certainly missed all the other un-noticed hard work he does for the team. And shifting Jason Knight perhaps wasn't the tactic of the year, either. But we won, yet again, and until that last "where's my butt plug" 15 minutes, Wildsmith was probably quite bored.
    But we still won, and looking at the League table is actually quite enjoyable - getting closer to the top three and with games in hand. The future is looking good. COME ON YOU RAMS!!!
  23. Like
    DavesaRam got a reaction from SKRam in Cheltenham Town (A) Sat 14th Jan   
    Faulty Towers - possibly the best episode, along with the "Thrashing his car with a tree" episode.
  24. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to angieram in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    I always vote for team goals over screamers in gotm competitions,  so I already know I'm in the minority.
    There was a goal a couple of games ago at Pride Park where we worked through the field and passed the ball into the net. Poetry.
    But every now and then, there's a screamer that puts all those, plus other rockets, in the shade. Bird's shot yesterday was one of those. 
    I'd be very surprised if it isn't our Goal of the Season. 
  25. Clap
    DavesaRam reacted to Rammy03 in They're playing football now, not hoofball.   
    We're playing better football now than what we've been doing over the last few years. It's a much better watch. It's proper football and none of this possession for possession sake rolling it out from the back nonsense. 
×
×
  • Create New...