-
Posts
1,545 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
-
-
Ken Tram reacted to Day in Derby County Daily Updates - TAKEOVER COMPLETED
This topic will be updated with the latest information, news and tweets on the current situation for those unable to follow the forum during the day.
Please help by forwarding any of the above to myself by private message only as I receive email notifications.
Thank you.
-
Ken Tram reacted to DCFC1388 in The Administration Thread
If we get funds to see us through to the end of the season, does that mean the new embargo is removed & we can go back to signing players?
Obviously still within the no transfer/loan fee & would have to have the funds to cover it.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Posh Ram in The Administration Thread
I haven't posted on here for ages as have been busy with work etc but feeling a bit emotional tonight. The EFL, Middlesbrough, and Wycombe will all be stains on football forever if they allow this to happen. But if the worst case scenario happens we'll be a phoenix club cheered on by an entire city. And we will bounce all the way back. By the time we're back in the Championship, the EFL will have been declared not fit for purpose, Wycombe will still be a tinpot League 1 team, and Steve Gibson will still be a Bamford.
I've never supported Derby expecting us to win anything, that's boring, I support the club because it's always been a shared passion I have with my Dad and my family all come from Derby. I don't want that to be taken away from me, and I know DCFC matters even more to lots of the members of this forum.
COYR
-
Ken Tram reacted to PistoldPete in The Administration Thread
Just the first and we are as Appleby has already said "good to go".
-
Ken Tram reacted to SBW in The Administration Thread
I think you are correct. But reading the EFL's stance on it, there is zero chance of that happening. They have listed the ways it can be resolved and I don't see them budging on that. No matter how much 'pressure' is put on them by MPs.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Crewton in What's happening today?
Thanks for that. I must say, she's been very impressive, as have most of the local MPs. Earning their £82,000 p.a this week ?
-
Ken Tram reacted to kevinhectoring in What's happening today?
Amanda Solloway’s message - she’s been speaking to M and W - is v encouraging. She seems to know which buttons to press
-
Ken Tram reacted to BramcoteRam84 in Nottingham Forest Match-day Thread Saturday 22nd January 12.30
Wouldn’t it be powerful if the Forest supporters club spoke out in support of Derby’s situation ahead of the game on Saturday. See it happening? No chance.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Carl Sagan in Nottingham Forest Match-day Thread Saturday 22nd January 12.30
Look on the bright side. Win this and even if we get liquidated we get to keep the Brian Clough Trophy for ever!
-
Ken Tram reacted to Ram Bam in Nottingham Forest Match-day Thread Saturday 22nd January 12.30
Was going to share this as well, the family of the young lad are friends of my partner's family.
I appreciate emotions are running high at the minute and will be even more so on Saturday with barbs about our current situation no doubt coming out way from the forest fans but would implore all rams going to the game to respect this and to even join in if possible.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Anag Ram in Nottingham Forest Match-day Thread Saturday 22nd January 12.30
Should put all matters aside to support this gesture.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Anag Ram in Nottingham Forest Match-day Thread Saturday 22nd January 12.30
Minor fixture. Little importance. Nothing to see here.
?
-
Ken Tram reacted to Duracell in Steve Gibson trying to liquidate Derby
I think you can just stop there.
I remember the sucker punch of the 2014 playoff final. It hurt not just because of what happened in the 90 minutes, or Keogh's mistake, or Zamora's finish, but because we were a sensibly-run club living within our means against a team of over-paid and over-priced players clearly there to pick up a pay packet. It really, truly felt like the 'wrong' team won, and QPR were effectively rewarded for cheating.
At no point did I ever want QPR to be liquidated, threatened with expulsion, or relegated to the third tier. My gripe was never with QPR fans, and for the crimes of Tony Fernandes, I wouldn't want a community to lose its club, Loftus Road to become derelict, or see 140 years of history turn to dust just because of the immorality of a handful of board members who happened to be at the club at the time.
It's not worth engaging with any Boro or Wycombe fan who cannot see that; those that want the scene of the crime punished rather than the criminals themselves aren't true football fans. They are prepared for an entire community to suffer as the fall guys and girls just to make themselves feel better about their own club's shortcomings. There is nothing you can do or say to change their mind, it's already made up.
-
Ken Tram reacted to CBRammette in MPs meet Quantuma update tweet 19/01
That is total disrespect though sorry. Bury would be as important to all of their fans and its place in their lives as Derby is to us. That is what this is about. We must not forget that esp how their MP spoke so eloquently to help us yesterday
-
Ken Tram reacted to Sparkle in MPs meet Quantuma update tweet 19/01
I wasn’t upset at reading all that and not surprised either - how can the EFL board sit there and not resign immediately - threatened by a member in Middlesbrough to be sued for apparently not doing their job so what do the EFL do - please don’t sue us you should sue Derby a fellow member club who they are supposed to be looking after and the EFL won’t stand in your way and they will help it happen even if it means liquidation for Derby but don’t sue us the EFL - absolute disgrace!
The EFL can make this stop right now and those politicians should be going right for jugular as Derby county have been set up to be humiliated and probably liquidated by deliberate actions of the governing body and the Middlesbrough parasite.
There simply must be legal action against these individuals for their conduct.
-
Ken Tram reacted to strawhillram in MPs meet Quantuma update tweet 19/01
If and when Gibson withdraws his claim, he’ll hail himself as our saviour and we should forever owe him our gratitude.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Duracell in MPs meet Quantuma update tweet 19/01
What makes no sense is that so long as Wycombe and Boro are pursuing this as a football debt, they are guaranteed no money. This will bury us and you can't sue a liquidate club.
With that in mind, how can you come to any conclusion other than that they are trying to have us liquidated?
-
Ken Tram reacted to Gaspode in MPs meet Quantuma update tweet 19/01
There is potentially a get out of jail (and save a small amount of face) for both the EFL and the two ambulance Chasers - if the EFL announce that they have reviewed the rules in relation to the law changing and that they have also reviewed the claims from the 2 chancers, they can then legimately say that they've told the 2 that their claims shouldn't be treated as football debts and so they will need to go to court to make their claims.
That paves the way for the PB to be announced while making the EFL look as if they've taken decisive action and still gives the scumbags a chance to press their claims (even though in reality both will realise they have virtaually no chance of success in a law court as opposed to the EFL kangaroo court they hope to appear in.....). No-one is having to publicly back down and the Rams can be saved....
-
Ken Tram reacted to Day in The Football Creditor rule is explicit, simple, and solves all of Derby's issues
Three parties have made offers, any one of which would allow the club to exit administration with a substantial payment to creditors.
These offers need clarity, that the claim by Boro and the potential claim by Wycombe do not qualify as Football Creditors.
The football creditor rule is not defined in the EFL regulations, it is part of the Articles of Association of the Football League Limited, of which all clubs are minority shareholders (the golden share).
The football creditor rule is in Article 48, which clearly defines what constitutes a football creditor, copied below from Companies House.
The rule clearly states that it is to cover payments of "debts due". How possibly, can an unproven, unquantified claim such as Boro's be consider a debt due?
If the EFL is suggesting that any claim by a football club or employee, which is unproven, should be classified as a football creditor it would create mayhem. And, bona fide football creditors with debts due, and other preferential and unsecured creditors would lose out as a result.
The EFL can't have this both ways. If they choose to say Article 48 does not qualify Boro's claim as a football creditor the EFL are suggesting they might be sued by Boro.
However, if they choose to say that Article 48 should be interpreted (which is a wild stretch) in a way that Boro should be classed as a football creditor then it is almost certain that the EFL would be sued by the Administrators and the creditors including genuine football creditors, and HMRC for their easily quantified losses.
The EFL also risk being sued under section 994 of the companies act for acting prejudicially against the interests of a minority shareholder of the football league ie. DCFC.
We need to apply pressure on the EFL to get off the fence, see that their actions alone are preventing the Administrators from getting a deal agreed.
Article 48 says that Boro's claim cannot be a football creditor and the EFL must state that and stop this nonesense.
"48 FOOTBALL CREDITORS
48.1 Where a Member Club defaults in making any payment due to any of the following persons,
the Member Club ('Defaulting Club') shall be subject to such penalty as the Board may decide
and subject also to Article 48.2:
48.1.1 The League, The FA Premier League and the Football Association;
48.1.2 any of the Pension Schemes;
48.1.3 any Member Club and any Club of The FA Premier League;
48.1.4 any holding company of The League and any subsidiary company of that holding
company;
48.1.5 any sums due to any full-time employee or former full-time employee of the Member
Club by way of arrears of remuneration up to the date on which that contract of employment is
terminated. This excludes for these purposes all and any claims for redundancy, unfair or
wrongful dismissal or other claims arising out of the termination of the contract
or in respect of any period after the actual date of termination;
48.1.6 any sums due to the Professional Footballers Association in repayment of
an interest free loan together with such reasonable administration and legal costs as have been
approved by the Board;
48.1.7 The Football Foundation;
48.1.8 The Football Conference Limited trading as "the National League";
48.1.9 The Northern Premier League Limited;
48.1.1O The Isthmian League Limited;
48.1.11 The Southern League Limited;
48.1.12 Any member club of the League or organisations listed in Articles 48.1.8 to 48.1.11
inclusive;
48.1.13 Any County Football Association affiliated to The Football Association; and
48.1.14 Any Leagues affiliated to The Football Association and any clubs affiliated to any
County Football Association recognised by The Football Association.
48.2 Subject to the provisions of Articles 48.3 and 48.4, the Board shall apply any sums
standing to the credit of the Pool Account which would otherwise be payable to a
Defaulting Club, in discharging the creditors in Article 48.1. As between the Football
Creditors, the priority for payment shall be in accordance with the order in which those
Football Creditors are listed in Article 48.1.
48.3 If, having discharged all Football Creditors in any preceding class of Football
Creditor (as
· required by Article 48.2) the sum then available is not suffident to discharge in full the
Football Creditors listed in Articles 48.1.1, 48.1.2 or 48.1.4 the Board will decide the
allocation.
48.4 If, having discharged all Football Creditors in any preceding class of Football
Creditor (as required by Article 48.2) the sum then available is not sufficient to discharge in
full the Football Creditors listed in Article 48.1.3, 48.1.5, 48.1.12, 48.1.13 or 48.1.14 the sum
will be allocated pro rata amongst the creditors of the same class.
Note - Clubs are reminded that any assignment of future entitlements from the pool account are
subject to Article 45 and this must be brought to the attention of the other party. Furthermore
assignments must be in legal form and registered with the office. Assignments are given priority
according to the date and time of registration."
-
Ken Tram reacted to CBRammette in What's happening today?
Missing some things in the volume. Please can we have this thread perhaps pinned where we just post what is happening today or what we need/can do today WITHOUT any discussion of said events or posts?
-
Ken Tram reacted to BucksRam in Margaret Beckett on Radio Derby
Not in her constituency but I've emailed her my thanks too.
-
Ken Tram reacted to uttoxram75 in Margaret Beckett on Radio Derby
Great idea.
It doesn't have to be a mod. If someone has the time and patience to do it we will make sure it gets closed and pinned when its ready.
-
Ken Tram reacted to Day in Margaret Beckett on Radio Derby
Happy to pin anything that will help, what I would suggest is identifying members that have clear understanding of the timeline of events, and work together inside a private message to compile for public viewing and sharing.
Once ready, either create a topic or send me the post to create and pin on the forum.