swansea ram Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Liverpool are interested in 16 yr old Harvey Elliot. They have offered 750,000 while Fulham want £8 million, and is going to tribunal. Why do we sell our best 16 year old for peanuts, whilst everyone gets good money for theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Hennessy Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Maybe because our guy hadn't signed his contract - which had been on the table for several weeks ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Harvey Elliot is a Liverpool player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Trav Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Erm..... what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 I think he meant: Liverpool signed him from Swansea when he was 16 but they couldn't agree the fee. Now the case is going to tribunal and Swansea wants a lot of money as he has been playing well for Blackburn. My English is poor but I do own English-swansea ram-English-dictionary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIllyD Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 I think the OP is slightly confused at the order of events. Liverpool signed him from Fulham as a 16yr old but didn't agree a fee so it's going to tribunal. Fulham want 8m, not sure if he signed a professional contract though, if so why is it going to tribunal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansea ram Posted February 8, 2021 Author Share Posted February 8, 2021 Liverpool are interested in 16 yr old Harvey Elliot. They have offered 750,000 while Fulham want £8 million, and is going to tribunal. Why do we sell our best 16 year old for peanuts, whilst everyone gets good money for theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 1 hour ago, swansea ram said: Liverpool are interested in 16 yr old Harvey Elliot. They have offered 750,000 while Fulham want £8 million, and is going to tribunal. Why do we sell our best 16 year old for peanuts, whilst everyone gets good money for theirs. Who are you comparing here? Not aware of us getting rid of anyone for peanuts or any other clubs getting good money for 16 year olds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 I'm really confused now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roboto Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 14 minutes ago, swansea ram said: Liverpool are interested in 16 yr old Harvey Elliot. They have offered 750,000 while Fulham want £8 million, and is going to tribunal. Why do we sell our best 16 year old for peanuts, whilst everyone gets good money for theirs. This is in the wrong place, but before it’s moved/locked... Liverpool have offered 1.25m less than what they paid (allegedly) for Gordon. Fulham won’t get anywhere near £8m especially if it goes to a tribunal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenniumram Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Blimey, I know people say they’re a bit backward in Wales, but I thought they’d got past 2019 in Swansea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansea ram Posted February 8, 2021 Author Share Posted February 8, 2021 Why would it be blocked. I only asked a question. And if it's in the wrong place, i apologize, i'm sure someone will put it in the right place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenniumram Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 8 minutes ago, swansea ram said: Why would it be blocked. I only asked a question. And if it's in the wrong place, i apologize, i'm sure someone will put it in the right place. Someone already has, you made the thread again ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 38 minutes ago, swansea ram said: Liverpool are interested in 16 yr old Harvey Elliot. They have offered 750,000 while Fulham want £8 million, and is going to tribunal. Why do we sell our best 16 year old for peanuts, whilst everyone gets good money for theirs. Has Elliot signed a pro contract? Gordon wouldn't, hence we had to take what was offered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie20 Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 59 minutes ago, Millenniumram said: Blimey, I know people say they’re a bit backward in Wales, but I thought they’d got past 2019 in Swansea! Bit of pot and kettle there me'thinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Clough Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Dimmu said: I think he meant: Liverpool signed him from Swansea when he was 16 but they couldn't agree the fee. Now the case is going to tribunal and Swansea wants a lot of money as he has been playing well for Blackburn. My English is poor but I do own English-swansea ram-English-dictionary. You mean Fulham, not Swansea, but you've got the rest right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIllyD Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 1 hour ago, RoyMac5 said: Has Elliot signed a pro contract? Gordon wouldn't, hence we had to take what was offered. Pretty sure if it's going to a tribunal then he won't have signed a pro contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 7 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said: You mean Fulham, not Swansea, but you've got the rest right The dictionary doesn't include proper nouns ?♂️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Yep it’s the same situation as ours with them not being under contract but we appear to have made agreements with the signing clubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JfR Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 That's probably not a million miles away from the deal for Gordon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.