Jump to content

World Cup 2018 thread


jackhasler23

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:

It is the only way you can judge an international team, everyone enters, they all have an equal chance and we ended up the 4th best team in it. 

So yep we are officially the 4th best team in the world. 

As long as you know the difference between 'officially' and 'actually' then that's fine.  No real way of defining it definitively, even leagues are imperfect in that regard.  But still, 4th in the World Cup is a fine achievement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Highgate said:

As long as you know the difference between 'officially' and 'actually' then that's fine.  No real way of defining it definitively, even leagues are imperfect in that regard.  But still, 4th in the World Cup is a fine achievement. 

If your team wins the World Cup are they the best team in the world?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Highgate said:

As long as you know the difference between 'officially' and 'actually' then that's fine.  No real way of defining it definitively, even leagues are imperfect in that regard.  But still, 4th in the World Cup is a fine achievement. 

Exactly. No way of defining it definitively so we have to use a world competition where everyone enters and all have an equal chance..

4th best team in the world actually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:

Exactly. No way of defining it definitively so we have to use a world competition where everyone enters and all have an equal chance..

4th best team in the world actually. 

No way to define it.

In fact, looking at Uruguay, they’ve won 4 and lost 1 at this World Cup.

They have a better record than England’s (90 mins) Won 3 Drawn 2 lost 2.

Belgium’s Won 5 Lost 1 will also be better than Croatia’s Won 3 Drawn 3 Lost 1 when they lose tomorrow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mick Brolly said:

_102508528_england1.jpg.f34f1571bab2f142e2ba63ecf5f5b32c.jpgpart of a article on BBC football website and it's certainly changed my outlook on immigration, don't think we'd have made the semis with just 5 players!

Oh, there are plenty in the country who would have more than a semi if and when immigration is curtailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Spanish said:

If your team wins the World Cup are they the best team in the world?

If the Rep of Ireland win the World Cup I think it's a sign that football is finished as a sport!  Well, with our current lot of players anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:

Exactly. No way of defining it definitively so we have to use a world competition where everyone enters and all have an equal chance..

4th best team in the world actually. 

Correct.  Now if the last word of the post had been 'officially' instead of 'actually' I would have agreed entirely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said:

No way to define it.

In fact, looking at Uruguay, they’ve won 4 and lost 1 at this World Cup.

They have a better record than England’s (90 mins) Won 3 Drawn 2 lost 2.

Belgium’s Won 5 Lost 1 will also be better than Croatia’s Won 3 Drawn 3 Lost 1 when they lose tomorrow.

 

Or we only lost 1 game that mattered..?

the best team in the world will be decided tomorrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:

You mean the world rankings that have Poland in about 5th place totally on their refusal to play any friendlies..?

4th best team in the world. 

Whatever makes you happy I suppose. The only side we beat convincingly outside of the pub team that was Panama was Sweden. If you want to simplify it to the point where your finish place in the world cup regardless of performance or opponent is what determines who the best team in the world is then please go ahead. France are already the best side in the world at the moment regardless of who wins tomorrow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GenBr said:

Whatever makes you happy I suppose. The only side we beat convincingly outside of the pub team that was Panama was Sweden. If you want to simplify it to the point where your finish place in the world cup regardless of performance or opponent is what determines who the best team in the world is then please go ahead. France are already the best side in the world at the moment regardless of who wins tomorrow.

 

But Russia are a pub team and the great Spain couldn’t beat them.....Egypt were going to be dark horses but they turned out to be dog poop.....Poland are ranked in the top 5 and were pathetic....Sweden stopped Italy going and finished above Germany and we swatted them aside..

only 3 other nations managed to get to the semi finals...and Argentina, Germany, Spain, Holland, Italy, Sweden, Uruguay, Colombia, poland, Brazil, Mexico would all have swapped their performances in there World Cup (or non performance) for ours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mick Brolly said:

_102508528_england1.jpg.f34f1571bab2f142e2ba63ecf5f5b32c.jpgpart of a article on BBC football website and it's certainly changed my outlook on immigration, don't think we'd have made the semis with just 5 players!

Good old Beeb, right on the ball as always. Although I'm fairly confident that we'd have been able to cobble a full squad together somehow.

Funny thing is, the above players are the ones who've come through the World Cup with the least criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:

But Russia are a pub team and the great Spain couldn’t beat them.....Egypt were going to be dark horses but they turned out to be dog poop.....Poland are ranked in the top 5 and were pathetic....Sweden stopped Italy going and finished above Germany and we swatted them aside..

only 3 other nations managed to get to the semi finals...and Argentina, Germany, Spain, Holland, Italy, Sweden, Uruguay, Colombia, poland, Brazil, Mexico would all have swapped their performances in there World Cup (or non performance) for ours. 

Can’t see why Brazil would swap their performances with England when they played better.

The only game they lost was to a team that comfortably beat England twice without breaking sweat.

Uruguay only lost to the best team in the tournament, which is more than what England can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PistoldPete2
1 hour ago, Grimbeard said:

Good old Beeb, right on the ball as always. Although I'm fairly confident that we'd have been able to cobble a full squad together somehow.

Funny thing is, the above players are the ones who've come through the World Cup with the least criticism.

France without immigration would be nothing at all. Also Beeb said Kane had six goals from six on target which certainly isnt true as his lame shot against Crotia was saved by the keeper, before his second shot hit the post.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PistoldPete2
42 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said:

Can’t see why Brazil would swap their performances with England when they played better.

The only game they lost was to a team that comfortably beat England twice without breaking sweat.

Uruguay only lost to the best team in the tournament, which is more than what England can say.

England are likely to break into the top 10 which would be about right. They are not top 4 so finishing fourth is an overachievement atm. Certainly behind Brazil, France and Belgium. Croatia too (just). germany and Spain probably ahead too even after their world cup no-shows., but for how much longer I dont know especially after Iniesta has retired.  Would like to see England play Belgium in a proper match after two non-events.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Mick Brolly said:

_102508528_england1.jpg.f34f1571bab2f142e2ba63ecf5f5b32c.jpgpart of a article on BBC football website and it's certainly changed my outlook on immigration, don't think we'd have made the semis with just 5 players!

...And there's still five players too many to be factually correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...