Ilsonram12 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Back with avengence tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Haha! Beat me to it. G'waaan Chrissy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 On 24/09/2016 at 18:29, tomsdubs said: Changing to 433 will fix absolutely nothing, sick of muppets mentioning it. Clueless. Here come the 4-3-3 apologists... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 In before we lose tonight and come to the conclusion that no formation is ever going to work and we're doomed forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I'm an advocate of this formation, just less sure tonight with Vydra playing the central forward role plus no Bryson or quality defensive mid..pleased that Ince is back in though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellafella Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 On 9/24/2016 at 18:08, YouRams said: The amount of comments read by radio Derby with fans calling for 433 is baffling. "We don't have the players for 442, bring back 433". Time to engage brains. We have no target striker, for those who have forgotten he's on loan at Fulham. We have no proven CDM (Hanson could step up but let's all be honest he's no fit Thorne) for those who have forgotten our CDM is camped on his favourite injury table again. When has playing a 433 with no Martin and no Thorne worked well? People are quick to forget our fall from grace when Martin was out injured! How on earth are you expecting it to work now? 433 is gone get over it! 442 might not be the answer but 433 certainly isn't! ohh..4-3-3 is back again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 17 minutes ago, McLovin said: Here come the 4-3-3 apologists... We'll probably cruise to a big win now, do like the team selection to be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 On 9/24/2016 at 18:08, YouRams said: The amount of comments read by radio Derby with fans calling for 433 is baffling. "We don't have the players for 442, bring back 433". Time to engage brains. We have no target striker, for those who have forgotten he's on loan at Fulham. We have no proven CDM (Hanson could step up but let's all be honest he's no fit Thorne) for those who have forgotten our CDM is camped on his favourite injury table again. When has playing a 433 with no Martin and no Thorne worked well? People are quick to forget our fall from grace when Martin was out injured! How on earth are you expecting it to work now? 433 is gone get over it! 442 might not be the answer but 433 certainly isn't! nerrrr ner ner ner ner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 Blatantly going to win aren't we, custard pie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 So we play 433, push 10 yards further forward and add a little forward pressing. Result; A better performance Who knew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 Always said we should play 433 "433 my lord 433 oh lord 433" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brady1993 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 7 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said: So we play 433, push 10 yards further forward and add a little forward pressing. Result; A better performance Who knew? It's almost as if tactics matter. Funny, who'd have thought.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 So please tell a stupid female how 4-4-2 is better and will win you this league. Anybody? Like those who have been saying it.... please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaRam Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Apparently not!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Just now, EnigmaRam said: Apparently not!! You're not a stupid female. You would be on the Forest Forum if you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 2 minutes ago, sage said: You're not a stupid female. You would be on the Forest Forum if you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnero Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 41 minutes ago, Ewe Ram said: So please tell a stupid female how 4-4-2 is better and will win you this league. Anybody? Like those who have been saying it.... please We'll explain it to you once you've done those dishes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Nothing to do with playing our most creative player Tom Ince or a new manager in the dugout? All down to 4-3-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brady1993 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Just now, David said: Nothing to do with playing our most creative player Tom Ince or a new manager in the dugout? All down to 4-3-3. You have to admit freeing Butterfield and Hughes up in midfield to really affect the game is likely to have had an effect on the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I think I'll hold judgment. We will see if 4-3-3 is still performing in a few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.