Mostyn6 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Still doesn't make sense, because as we should all know by now, goals aren't everything in a striker's game. Look at how poor we are and were without Chris Martin. We didn't struggle to score, but we couldn't keep possession in dangerous areas which resulted in far more chances for the opposition, and consequently, worse results.if you think that, then frankly you didn't watch the games properly.Martin's absence isn't the reason Grant flapped a few into his own net. Martin's absence isn't the reason every Shotton, Christie or Keogh clearance starting dropping to the opponent who went on to score.Make your mind up. Was it McClaren's fault for having his head on the Newcastle job? or was it Martin's absence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 just to add, having close friends who are Everton and WBA fans, I happen to have watched Anichebe with interest. Whoever said he can hold a ball up is talking *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeadlySaul Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 just to add, having close friends who are Everton and WBA fans, I happen to have watched Anichebe with interest. Whoever said he can hold a ball up is talking *****.What sort of player is he then? I can't say I've watched him play that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Unfortunately from WBA's point of view, I'm hearing reports of a bid from Derby are wide of the markDon't say that - the fans who follow every word according to the gospel according to St Nixon will have to look for another idol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodypecker Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Getting a tad frustrated at DCFC regarding the capture of a creative midfielder and a reliable striker to bolster the squad.I'm sure the 'irons in the fire' all have their merits and that as 'deadline day' looms, things may develop.To date, we've been attractive but not ruthless, competent but not clinical - especially in the 'final third' with ball delivery and shooting ability.We need to win games we're dominating possession in, and get more points on the board.90+ points for May still looks a very long way away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 if you think that, then frankly you didn't watch the games properly.Martin's absence isn't the reason Grant flapped a few into his own net. Martin's absence isn't the reason every Shotton, Christie or Keogh clearance starting dropping to the opponent who went on to score.Make your mind up. Was it McClaren's fault for having his head on the Newcastle job? or was it Martin's absence?I have never blamed McClaren, so I don't see how I need to "make my mind up".But to say a striker is not as good who does a hell of a lot for the team in work rate, link up play and all the rest of it, but doesn't quite score as many goals is very flippant.I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking if Bent's name isn't in the goal scorers' column, then you're often left wondering did he even play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodypecker Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 At present, the Rams' players are pretty lousy at getting the ball to Darren, though.As with when Chris was injured, we still seem singularly incapable of slipping the ball quickly between the defenders he is perched near - he has usually done the business when that's finally happened!IMHO his strike rate last season was phenomenal for the time he spent in possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Just to add to my previous point, I'm not even saying I do or don't rate Anichebe or Bent, it's just the point between types of players.FWIW, I thought Bent had one of his best "all round" games against Birmingham and didn't actually score. Won as many knock-ons as I have seen and got involved much more. Probably should have scored through, at least once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Not a fan of Anichebe, always seemed like a 'nearly man' for his career so far, add to that his injury record and I would rather see us put the money towards a midfielder or full back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodypecker Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Yep, Bent should have scored at Brum. I was willing him to do so, and as as ex-Villain, he would've delighted the Bluenoses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 What sort of player is he then? I can't say I've watched him play that much.think Danny Graham, but without the consistency, or the ability to hit the target as often, and with injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester40 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Harsh! ...Graham is Sammon-esque in a Sunderland shirt. Be glad when window closes though. Genuinely was v.excited by Ince, Weimann and Shackell signings, whilst Carson, Baird, Bent, Pearce all seemed pretty solid signings too. Anichebe, Butterfield at 4m, and these various other 'linked' players just not really doing it for me... Really wouldn't mind if we signed no-one and got two in in loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Sagan Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Nixon says Anichebe isn't keen to come and sit on the bench. Butros (probably equally as reliable) says reports of a bid are wide of the mark. If we accept 2 + 2 = 5 for a moment, maybe what it means is that Anichebe's agent is trying to stir things up for a move and using us (as a club wanting to spend) to attempt to drum up some interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Nixon says this, Nixon says that - he's a new-age sky pixie; which I suppose makes some on here the football equivalent of god-botherers.All we need is one or two holding up "Repent, for the end (of the transfer window) is nigh" signs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcnram Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Probably better to get someone who is 'promising' from the lower divisions or abroad. They would be happy to enhance their game training with the first team and getting the occasional call off the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted McMinn Football Genius Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Nixon says Anichebe isn't keen to come and sit on the bench. Butros (probably equally as reliable) says reports of a bid are wide of the mark. If we accept 2 + 2 = 5 for a moment, maybe what it means is that Anichebe's agent is trying to stir things up for a move and using us (as a club wanting to spend) to attempt to drum up some interest?makes sense from the agent and players POV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Why?seen him play many times for Everton, and he was despised up there. Many of them can't believe they managed to swindle £6 million for him. Big, fast and strong but cannot finish for toffee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringerBell Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 seen him play many times for Everton, and he was despised up there. Many of them can't believe they managed to swindle £6 million for him. Big, fast and strong but cannot finish for toffee. Toffee? You trying to start the Alan Ball rolling for Everton puns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester40 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 6milliion? they must be minted.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Hughes Hair Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 6milliion? they must be minted..That's a bit (Graeme) Sharp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.