Jump to content

Kenny Burns opens his mouth again


plymouthram

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lol. Burnley have kept most of their team from last season... Except for ings and shackell. 

So so everyone except their best players. Basically the same team then, they won't even notice. 

Except for Ings . shackell and Trippier!  Ince and Weinman waste of money! Wait and see! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PistoldPete2

Not sticking up for Kenny but I think is he saying we have too many wingers with the likes of Calero ,Dawkins ,Russell ,Ince and Wiemann 

 

Sammon has gone with no CF replacement and we only really have Bent and Martin 

 

Tin Hat on again 

 

weimann is not a winger. Neither is Dawkins. If anything we don't really have an out and out winger at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PistoldPete2

Tbf burnnley do still have some good players left. But with out shackell and Ings I don't think they are as strong as last time they were in the Championship when they were only slightly better than us. So them losing shackell and us gaining him should swing it in our favour. Plus ince and weimann... Neither of them are a waste of money of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cycle of.. (Jeremy Clarkson/Katie Hopkins/NHS Boob job girl) Kenny Burns. 

1. Outrageous manufactured 'opinion' for the sole purpose of WUMming. 

2. Outrage at manufactured 'opinion'. (THAT IS THIS THREAD ETC)

3. Increased activity on article/twitter/other platforms due to aforementioned outrage = they are still relevant.

4. Still relevant = more work

5. More work = (see point 1)

Break the cycle. Lock this thread. Don't comment in the future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cycle of.. (Jeremy Clarkson/Katie Hopkins/NHS Boob job girl) Kenny Burns. 

1. Outrageous manufactured 'opinion' for the sole purpose of WUMming. 

2. Outrage at manufactured 'opinion'. (THAT IS THIS THREAD ETC)

3. Increased activity on article/twitter/other platforms due to aforementioned outrage = they are still relevant.

4. Still relevant = more work

5. More work = (see point 1)

Break the cycle. Lock this thread. Don't comment in the future.

 

Its a classic example of what academics call a "Hegelian Dialectic"

Comprising of three parts Thesis , Antithesis, Synthesis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...