Jump to content

Chester40

Member
  • Posts

    4,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chester40

  1. 5 minutes ago, Henrycav81 said:

    Can people stop saying Tyson as nearly qualified for a bus pass or is a near pensioner he bloody younger than me (just), and what’s wrong with using an old picture of yourself 😀

    Having read the amazing  biography of his life... I'd hope he has a fair few more miles on the clock than you though! 

  2. I agree that it's a good night ahead. Things are finally moving in this ageing era of mega-beasts!

    Either way - Joshua gets closer to the chance to fight for something big ..or he gets taught a lesson and he's off the table as a creditable champion. With only a fight with Fury left for him as worth watching (Wilder seems done now).

    Parker seems a decent bloke, but he seems to be just under the league of the top heavyweights so I kinda hope Zhang bullies him into submission and that then allows him to take on Fury eventually and all questions are answered.

  3. 9 minutes ago, Nuwtfly said:

    I don't think he thought he'd failed

    But I think he acknowledged that the relationship wasn't working and probably wasn't happy that his boss had already hired his replacement and sat him on the bench...

    He accepted results weren't great, that what he was trying wasn't working as quickly/well as he hoped...and he had various reasons (excuses) why that was the case and felt it wasn't within his scope to change those things (ie finances, ownership, fanbase etc).

    Having read a number of manager's autobiographies that's their version of 'failing'. It's never their fault.

  4. 13 minutes ago, CornwallRam said:

    c£10m on non player wages seems very high. Especially as a lot of staff were made redundant during admin. Is there any detail on that?

    Warne et al...? Plus Medical staff, groundsmen,  stewards, catering, ticket office, general office/admin, stadium upkeep, advertising,  sales team,  revenue generation, academy staff, cleaners,  maintenance, security ... guess it could be quite a lot of people still.

    Wonder what it was like before... 

  5. Back 3 is a real back 3...

    Dominated and should have been out of sight.

    Vale got a foothold and we couldn't get out without be too troubled. Barks and Bird especially looking loose in possession.

    Long ball over the top and Barks does well and lays off for a good cross from Adams that is steered home by Gayle.

    Not actually played a lot of football but they look very susceptible to the long ball and are doubling up out wide so when the ball drops in the middle we are picking it up in space.

    Wildsmith done nothing.  Ward MoTM so far. Back 3 untroubled largely.

     

     

  6. I personally think a back 3 is a good option...but we have played it poorly at times.

    We have seemed to spread really wide and then pass it out from the keeper and play it ponderously across the back 3 to the other side and inevitably knock it down the line. Its congested, are receiving the ball with our backs to the goal at chest height.

    Cue scrappy game, lots of free kicks for backing in, ton of throw ins ...and we lose control of the game.

  7. 20 minutes ago, Carl Sagan said:

    So is that going to be?

    Wildsmith

    Ward     Nelson     Bradley     Cashin

    Adams

    Sibley         Bird

    Mendez-Laing     Gayle     Barkhuizen

     

    Can't see it personally....

    Back 3 spread wide with Adams covering if back 3 are dragged too wide.

    Ward and Sibley pushing up and crossing - even over lapping if we get on top.

    Could potentially be very attacking if we do it properly. 

    Also could be very negative if not.

  8. 14 minutes ago, Gerry Daly said:

    People keep suggesting teams with a flat back 4 not including Bradley. Thats just not going to happen you know it. 

    That's it, get us on back on track talking about Warne's poor tactics.... as opposed to his poor team talks.😜

    If we lose today the **** will hit the fan that's for sure... be nice to just talk about football rather than regurgitating the same arguments over and over.

     

  9. The only thing I could hear in my head after Wildsmith's 'tackle' was Cloughie saying 'oh bloody hell, you need shooting'.

    Just criminal. As stupid and brainless as anything you will ever see.

    Always said it, Warne-ball is only acceptable when you win. First half was better and we were winning. 

    2nd half was bloody terrible. All the chickens came home to roost. NML looked shattered, Bird was ineffective.  

    Two shocking defensive errors and we are left just launching it aimlessly. 

    Needs a big turn round.

  10. The two things that annoyed me most during the game were :

    Ball was threaded to Hourihane in the middle of the pitch, if he'd turned he would have had room to run into. Instead he just passed it 20 yards backwards to a defender who under pressure passes it back to the keeper.

    Bird collects the ball which has been cleared, Derby are on top,  he is facing the goal with a few yards to run into..he turns away and tries to slide a pass out wide that trickles out for a throw in.

    They are our 'ball players' and seemed happy to leave the 'match winning' to our 'skillful' players- Wilson, NML, Barks..who all struggled to do that yesterday.

    Defence largely looked solid. Adams worked his socks off ...really felt as a pair they contributed too little.  I know a lot will say its all down to Warne telling them to how to play but we just didn't look after the ball in midfield at all.

  11. Think the tone is overly negative.

    We have been way more terrible and won games. 

    Tight first half and it seemed to be prime-Warneball when we went 1 up.

    Slow out to block their shot and its 1-1. Even game.

    First 10mins of the 2nd half we were awful. Couldnt pass to each other.

    Then started to get a grip and went behind to what feels like yet another slack marking error.

    Warne made changes.  We piled forward and couldn't quite create a clear chance. 

    Draw would have been the fair result and a decent point.

    Thought the defence was solid again. Niambe looked great when he came on. Sibley was decent. Wilson was hot and cold. Adams a workaholic. 

    Hourihane was ok.  Bird and NML seemed out of sorts.

    Wildsmith's kicking was atrocious. 

    Gayle and Barks didn't make a huge impact.

    Two winnable... and must win games coming up.

  12. 2 hours ago, Scott129 said:

    I don't understand how his personality can be so effervescent and outgoing, and then his style of football just.. isn't.

    I know they're not mutually exclusive, but it's weird how polar opposite they are.

    I think as well as out going, what he describes at times is introverted, ultra self-aware and ultimately quite indulgent navel-gazing.

    That also suggests a lot of over thinking,  questioning himself, worrying about the opposition,  being honest about what could/couldn't go wrong. 

    That easily results in pragmatic football. Someone like Kevin Keegan or Jurgen Klopp who is all passion probably don't worry too much analysing everything and just think about what their team can do -making them more attacking ?

×
×
  • Create New...