Animal is a Ram

I'm getting to the point where I just want it done.
It's been 8 months since the EFL appealed. 

This is what happens when you put a club up for sale via the Dark Web

I'm getting to the point where I just want it done.
It's been 8 months since the EFL appealed. 

I'm getting to the point where I just want it done.
It's been 8 months since the EFL appealed. 

Looking at other team’s forums and the heart warming responses on Twitter and the like makes you realise how people blindly lap up anything printed in the Daily Mail. No wonder we are stuck with Boris Johnson for the next 200 years. I had a read to check the number of modal verbs used in that badly written article and subsequently found another article that said our survival was ‘one of the most dismal sights of the weekend’.
I love the unbiased tone of that article. I am going to presume that Mel Morris has become friends with Jeremy Corbyn. I think it is the most likely explanation for this love affair they have developed with us, whilst conveniently ignoring all other transgressions, as pointed out elsewhere.
Personally I draw comfort from knowing that no matter how much that awful rag hates us, it will never be as much as I despise it and it’s bigoted, badly written divisive poo.
 
 

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

Absolutely. Smacks of Kangaroo-court style approach ie we’ll screw you eventually so don’t bother trying to prove your innocence 
 

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I still find it utterly bewildering that:
The EFL signs off on the accounts originally
Circles back around saying we can't do that, takes us to investigation
Independent panel dismisses it
EFL appeal, different independent panel says it's naughty (apparently, unconfirmed).
Is any of this wrong?

I'd reply with, what the hell has it got to do with you? This is part of the problem nowadays, these journos think they are entitled.... Maybe we should ask Craig how much he gets paid per article, where is his bank account, what are his sources, 
 
Turnabout is fair game surely?

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

I know we want more transparency around what's happening around the club, but this isn't it.

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

100% the club is a mess - but they always report the extremes.
It was always going to be highly unlikely, but they lead with 21 point deduction and made it sound like a certainty. You don't see the headlines from the Mail anywhere else.

https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/wayne-rooney-one-game-save-193244321.html
 
Yahoo (?!) always have the full Percy articles without the paywall for those who haven’t read it.