Mucker1884
-
Posts
15,063 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Mucker1884
-
-
People who stand impatiently right outside the cubicle door tutting, whilst I'm stood inside trying to find my twinkle through those godforsaken button flies and thermal long johns!
- Steve How Hard?, Angry Ram and Mostyn6
-
3
-
18 minutes ago, Boycie said:
Me too, the two for one deals tempt you in, plus sticky Vicky’s on later.
There is no "too"!
Just by reading your post, it's clear we holiday in completely different resorts!
-
5 hours ago, richinspain said:
Although fried is not uncommon, revuelto (scrambled) is much more typical in bars at least.
Ah, that explains it... we do tend to do most of our eating over there in bars, as opposed to restaurants! LOL! ;-)
-
8 hours ago, richinspain said:
Based purely on my holidays, would it be fair to say that an egg like that (They look perfect to me, by the way) is almost a rarity over there? Or certainly a lot less common than huevos revueltos?
...Or am I mistaken?
-
2 hours ago, RamNut said:
I can't quite imagine getting poked by a nun.
........or vice versa
Funny that, as I'm the complete opposite!
-
8 hours ago, Parsnip said:
This badass is my dog's brother - best working dog winner at Crufts today. I'm actually not a massive fan of Crufts and that kind of dog showing, but my boy is proper champion stock and I'll be cheering 'Dave' on on Sunday where he's up for best in show.
Not a massive dog lover, but "I don't mind" them.
However, if I ever had a dog, I'd...
-
2 hours ago, Carl Sagan said:
Up in the Arctic. Oh yes...
Disqualified!
... No knee!
- Parsnip and Carl Sagan
-
1
-
1
-
12 minutes ago, Boycie said:
Good job there was no riding crop in the picture or the forum would of crashed.
It wouldn't have crashed furlong though, thanks to that lovely David boy.
- Mrs Cone, Steve How Hard? and Boycie
-
3
-
3 hours ago, Bwash_Ram said:
I always liked the Scottish Lorne sausage, when i used to work up there many moons ago.
I used to love that Scottish square sausage some cafes offer... but I had to stop ordering it as the woman behind the counter always took the pith out of my lisp!
#baconbuttiewilldo
-
5 minutes ago, BathRam72 said:
I haven't read all of this post and I might be barking up the wrong tree.
But I am pretty sure the rules governing this flight would come under the CAA/FCAA not the FAA (Like I said I might be wrong and I am sure the rules are similar) FAA governs the USA and also covers several other countries.
UK - CAA
France - FCAA
Can't remember, as what I read has now left my brain again!
I recall something about state of ownership/state of registration, blah, blah, option to throw it over to someone else etc (as to who carries out the investigation, and under which governing bodies). It's all in the first few paragraphs of the linked report.
What I can say though, is that all the wording in italics (in my post) was taken from the linked pdf (posted by @RamNut, top of this page), which appears to be the official report from official investigators... thus far!
-
-
8 minutes ago, AmericanRam said:
I went to the doctor as my crossword addiction was making me depressed.
He told me not to get too down.
Hope you "receive the excavation anon" (3,4,4)
-
-
1 hour ago, Boycie said:
What you doing in Russia mate?
5 minutes ago, Angry Ram said:Paris mate.
You are in Russia... Doin' Paris?
I hope she signs yer shirt before you leave in the morning!
-
2 hours ago, RamNut said:
So, amongst other things...
The pilot's licence does not cover taking passengers for reward.
Passenger(s) can, however, be carried under "cost sharing" restrictions.
And...
"The FAA issued legal interpretations in 200917 and 201418 making clear that a pilot must not pay less than the pro rata share for the flight. If the flight involves the pilot and one passenger, then the pilot must pay half the operating expenses. The ruling also made clear that the pilot must have a bona fide purpose (also known as common purpose) for making the flight and must dictate when the flight is to go. The flight must not be made for the purpose of merely transporting the passenger".
... "The investigation continues to examine all pertinent operational, technical, organisational and human factors which might have contributed to the accident. In particular, work will be undertaken to:
a. Refine the analysis of the radar information to try and understand the last few minutes of the flight.
b. Assess the possible implications of the weather conditions in the area at the time of the accident.
c. Analyse video from the ROV to determine the aircraft attitude as it entered the water.
d. Consider the regulatory requirements surrounding the flight including airworthiness requirements, aircraft permissions and flight crew licencing.
A final report will be published in due course."
I'm saying nothing!
-
1 hour ago, David said:
Raise prices of your TV subscription just because they can.
I went to NowTV in Jan (from Virgin)... and the Sky Sports day pass has already gone up a quid to £8.99!
I'll be cashing in my freebie day pass for tonight though, so fe*k 'em, for now... I'll have a moan when I have to pay for the next one!
-
7 minutes ago, David said:
Hover over where it says how long ago the post was made and it will show the date and time a post was made.
Jeez!
It's like you are some sort of mystical Wizard with powers beyond earthly comprehension.
This forum just gets fantasticer and amazinger by the hour!
Can I have my ashes scattered here?*... it's like my new favouritest place to be!
*Don't need an answer straight away, but get back to me next week... just in case!
- ronnieronalde, Wolfie and angieram
-
1
-
2
-
Just thinking out loud... really not a biggy, but it could be a slight improvement (in my opinion)...
The timing of posts... A few days ago shows the date only. Earlier today just gives the hint of "1 hr ago" or "3hrs ago" etc.
Timing can be critical... particularly on match days! "Did he post that before our late winner, or after?" "Was that post made before or after the red card?" "Did he post that before I posted the same thing in a different thread?" etc.
Even with the "5 days ago", we have to count back, to work out what day that was. Matchday? The day before? The day after? Was it just after midnight (3 hours after a game) or late that evening (24 hours after the game)?
Can the posts therefore show day, date and time, or is the current approximation the best we can hope for?
...not asking for a friend... for obvious reasons!
-
7 hours ago, Ghost of Clough said:
Pretty sure it was his outbox ?
It was the best I could do, with the words I had at my disposal, but yes, the same thought crossed my mind as I wrote it!
I'd have got away with it, if it wasn't for you pesky kids!
...Anyway... it could also be his inbox... each to their own, 'n all that!
-
1 minute ago, reveldevil said:
Duh, think about it.
It would make it much harder to read the paper and clear his inbox if he had to overtake at the same time!
Isn't that what Sir Alex ended up in court for a few years back... clearing his inbox on the motorway? He got off though, of course, if memory serves!
-
7 minutes ago, sawley_ram said:
It normally does! Thing is I just join the motorway safely and sit in the inside lane a good distance behind any lorry doing around 55-60mph. The morons behind me shoot into the outside lane doing 80mph+ and I usually pass them 15 minutes further up the road. I don't swap lanes at all unless behind a very slow-moving lorry going up hill for example.
Imagine how many of those outside-lane morons you'd pass if you occasionally upped it to 65mph, and overtook a few of those lorries, before immediately returning to lane one.
Try it, and let us know what you think.
-
23 minutes ago, David said:
Whatever that is the forum didn’t filter it ?
I'm going for Arse!
...No... wait... I mean... Oh bugger... No wait... I mean...
- Mostyn6, mozza and Steve How Hard?
-
1
-
2
-
46 minutes ago, HantsRam said:
Not my pet.......?
That's the dog's bo***ck's, that!
- Steve How Hard?, mozza, richinspain and 2 others
-
1
-
4
-
Random stuff that people do that annoy me
in The Jim Smith Room
Posted
I don't normally, in all honesty, but I considered it an appropriate descriptive name, to ensure that there was no confusion or unfair comparison between mine and @reveldevil's.