dantheram Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 You'd have thought that Portsmouth would have learnt something from their past, wouldn't you? Yet another relatively expensive signing that is very questionable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfb Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Well, i'll go t'foot of our stairs..... not an 'undisclosed fee'... my my, the board are slipping, we know they've got a few bob now dont we.... :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Grab the pitch forks lads and lass's! SPEND YANKS SPEND! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JacobDcfc Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 has this been confirmed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Well, i'll go t'foot of our stairs..... not an 'undisclosed fee'... my my, the board are slipping, we know they've got a few bob now dont we.... :eek: That's just paper talk and possibly the full value including add ons, when the clubs announce it it will be undisclosed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramblur Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Whilst I'm not one to question infinite wisdom, without any mention of a sell on clause you can't just say that its logical. If you think about it I think they would have taken a mil with some add ons after 5 games or so and ran. I'm not sure if they were confident that we'd ever sell him on and at his age he's not exactly going to get drastically more valuable is he. The accounts give figures (as at 30th June) of "Maximum liability under sell on clauses" as follows:- 2010 £1.809m 2009 £1.463m 2008 £1.550m Unfortunately,it's not particularly easy to tie down,as players carrying a liability could have been sold and new ones brought in during any given period. We can only guess that the 2010 figure will feature Brayford and Bailey,and possibly Moxey and Barker.Steve Davis may even feature,as I've a feeling it may have formed part of the compensation package. The actual heading implies that clauses are capped,which I didn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 No sell on for Davies, the compensation included payments for promotion within 3 minutes and appearances. This figure comprises an initial fee of £275,000, an extra £250,000 based on appearances and an additional £200,000 if Derby win promotion to the Premiership within 3 years. Taken from Wiki, but I suspect tribunal decisions would be accurately reported somewhere and Wiki shouldn't be wrong on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingy_85 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 You guys must be laughing surely? I know Pompey fans aren't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceland Ram Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 He is going to score against us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 He is going to score against us He can, aslong as we score more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 http://www.dcfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10270~2382917,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I see the 750k is now undisclosed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceland Ram Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I see the 750k is now undisclosed. Portsmouth didn't want to be embarrased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I bet there's add ons in there too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceland Ram Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I bet there's add ons in there too. Yer but it is us paying them for haing him. e.g. he has to make at least 20 starts or we owe them 200k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceland Ram Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Yer but it is us paying them for haing him. e.g. he has to make at least 20 starts or we owe them 200k. I mean HAVING. not haing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samtheram83 Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 its good to see the movement of unwanted players out of the club. I hope its a sign of things to come with a few more of the squad rumoured to be surplus to requirements. If as rumoured Bywater, Leacock and Pearson could go would that be the last of the premier league side? can't think of anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Interesting to read that if he had played 1 more game we would of owed Charlton another half a million, what an absolute waste of money! :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Seems a bit odd paying a clause at 16 games, sums Pearson and Jewell up I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliRam Posted July 8, 2011 Share Posted July 8, 2011 Interesting to read that if he had played 1 more game we would of owed Charlton another half a million, what an absolute waste of money! :eek: That's insane, and goes a long way to explaining why his career at Derby went as it did. Everything said though, I wish him all the best at Portsmouth, despite having a torrid time with us he remained fairly classy and never said a bad word about the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.