Jump to content

Test Cricket is Back


sage

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said:

Well, who else thinks we're going to throw away our wickets this evening acting like it's a 50 over game with a high target and be all out for below 200 with at least two sessions left?

I’m at the county ground watching Derbyshire in the T20 tomorrow it’s a 2.30 start I’m confident I won’t be missing any of the test match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do the selectors go from here?

Anderson doesn't look like taking wickets and just looks old.

Not sure Broad has the energy to play again so soon after this one.

Wood may or may be fit but has a long history of injury.

BNot sure how much bowling Stokkes will be able to do.

No Leach, no Archer. Moeen's finger may have grown back.

 

Is there anyone with a bit of pace?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said:

Well, the conclusion of the test match probably won't interfere with any other sportsing entertainment / obligations to continue living today, but, we can all rejoyce in just how salty Australia are about the stunning revelation that you can't use the ground to catch a ball.

What's the difference 😉

image.png.beed20695242c8977d5690ae95927584.png

image.png.4438991d28a6269632cec1da055d1469.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think it’s a daft rule. The catch was taken cleanly and the ball was held under control. It didn’t hit the ground first and in the spirit of the game I’d say that was a catch.

In a game without telly the batsman would have walked off without a problem.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...