jimbobram Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 On 23/10/2017 at 13:38, EnigmaRam said: Hudds had A great first half and terrible second half on Saturday. as to the original question. We should sign Ledley over kleftmeister. we still need to get rid of Bryson, butters, bent and Anya though We definitely do not need to get rid of Bryson. We need him back. The others I agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie20 Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, jimbobram said: We definitely do not need to get rid of Bryson. We need him back. The others I agree with. We either need to keep Bryson or sign a similar replacement - a midfield runner who's strength lies in the attacking rather than defensive half of the pitch. Currently we are too static in midfield and the addition of just one more mobile player in that area would change the dynamics significantly. Given the situation at the time, selling Jeff Hendrick for £10m was a right and sensible decision but he's the type of player who would now fit well into GRs' side providing he has improved his consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodley Ram Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 Yep ? agree we need/want Bryson back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG400 Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 So the choice is either A young hungry player who played his heart out under Rowett or a Old Premier league has been, who will want big wages to stay in Jan I guess you can see where my vote went Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 31 minutes ago, JG400 said: So the choice is either A young hungry player who played his heart out under Rowett or a Old Premier league has been, who will want big wages to stay in Jan I guess you can see where my vote went Since when was 27 classed as young and 30 as an old has been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG400 Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 10 minutes ago, rynny said: Since when was 27 classed as young and 30 as an old has been? Give me licence to exaggerate for effect ? Everybody else does ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkbyram Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 The argument about Ledley being old is ridiculous! 30 might have been old for a footballer a few years ago when players’ lifestyle and diet was so different and tackles were allowed but it’s changed now. Top level players are managed so carefully that they don’t age is quick, they look after their muscles and fitness much better. Ledley took about 15 minutes to recover from a broken leg last year and has settled quickly into our midfield after 5 months off. Unless you’re a big fan of foreign names or you have a phobia of beards or Welshmen then I can’t really see why there is even a debate for this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thameram Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 New contract absolute must brings something we haven't got Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richinspain Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 14 minutes ago, Thameram said: New contract absolute must brings something we haven't got Nah, we’ve conceded a goal while he was on the pitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 Should be signed before others come sniffing, especially when he’s admitted he wants to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lrm14 Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 It isn't even a debate is it. A full international who has played in the prem for most of his career and has been absolutely excellent for us since he came. Or a man only 3 years younger deemed surplus to requirements at a side struggling at this level. Ledley please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 How is it we obliterated our midfield by getting rid of Butters and Bryson and loaning out Elsnik, we make a balls up with keiftenbeld, make a last minute signing in Ledley and end up with almost the best midfield in the division? Thorne, Johnson, Huddlestone and Ledley. I wouldn't fancy seeing that line up against my team. I slated Rowett for an appalling transfer window...apologies Gary, as you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 Nothing will convince me that selling hughes for £4.5m was a good idea. i'd like us to have found a role for Bryson as - ironically - he seems to be the most rowett type of midfielder we have. losing butterfield - not bothered. the change to 4231 means we need more holding midfielders. there is room for ledley and keith plus huddlestone and thorne if johnson is going to play further forward. But that would spell the end for Hanson, butterfield and bryson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zag zig Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 Lesley has to be our first signing if as he says, he wants to stay, Kleft I doubt will be sold anyway by Cotterill. We made one balls up, let's not make it two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 39 minutes ago, RamNut said: Nothing will convince me that selling hughes for £4.5m was a good idea. i'd like us to have found a role for Bryson as - ironically - he seems to be the most rowett type of midfielder we have. losing butterfield - not bothered. the change to 4231 means we need more holding midfielders. there is room for ledley and keith plus huddlestone and thorne if johnson is going to play further forward. But that would spell the end for Hanson, butterfield and bryson. We might have had to sell due to shackell Bent and wieman still being here which nobody thought they would be last March,! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.